Summary and recommendation
ProofHub, the flat-rate project management platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning despite supporting SAML 2.0 SSO. While ProofHub integrates with Okta through Group Push and Schema Discovery for some provisioning capabilities, this approach is limited to Okta users and doesn't provide the standardized SCIM protocol that modern IT teams expect. The lack of documented SCIM support means organizations using other identity providers like Entra ID or Google Workspace have no automated provisioning options whatsoever.
This creates a significant operational gap for IT teams managing ProofHub access across their organizations. While ProofHub's flat pricing model ($45-89/month for unlimited users) makes it attractive for large teams, the absence of proper provisioning automation means manual user management at scale—exactly when you'd most benefit from automation. Without SCIM, IT teams must manually create, update, and deactivate user accounts in ProofHub, creating security risks when employees leave and compliance headaches for access reviews.
The strategic alternative
ProofHub has no native SCIM. That leaves a workflow gap in offboarding, access reviews, and license cleanup unless your team handles the app another way. Stitchflow builds and maintains the IT workflows your team still runs manually, across every app, including the ones without APIs.
Quick SCIM facts
| SCIM available? | No |
| SCIM tier required | N/A |
| SSO required first? | Yes |
| SSO available? | Yes |
| SSO protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Documentation | Not available |
Supported identity providers
| IdP | SSO | SCIM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta | ✓ | ❌ | SAML and SWA authentication. Group Push and Schema Discovery for provisioning. |
| Microsoft Entra ID | Via third-party | ❌ | No Entra integration documented. |
| Google Workspace | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
| OneLogin | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
The cost of not automating
Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages ProofHub accounts manually. Here's what that costs:
The ProofHub pricing problem
ProofHub gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.
Tier comparison
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essential | $45/month flat (unlimited users) | ||
| Ultimate Control | $89/month flat (first 3 months, then $135) |
Pricing and provisioning options
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essential | $45/month flat (unlimited users) | ||
| Ultimate Control | $89/month flat (first 3 months, then $135) |
What this means in practice
No native provisioning capability: ProofHub has no documented SCIM API or native user management automation. All provisioning happens through Okta's Group Push feature, which means:
Flat pricing with SSO gating: ProofHub's unlimited user model sounds attractive, but SSO requires the Ultimate Control plan at $135/month after the promotional period.
Additional constraints
Summary of challenges
- ProofHub does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
- Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
- Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually
What ProofHub actually offers for identity
SAML SSO (Available on all paid plans)
ProofHub supports SAML 2.0 integration with identity providers:
| Setting | Details |
|---|---|
| Protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Supported IdPs | Generic SAML providers |
| Configuration | Manual metadata exchange |
| Additional security | IP allowlisting, 128-bit SSL encryption |
| Initiation | Both SP-initiated and IdP-initiated |
Okta Integration (via OIN)
The official Okta Integration Network listing for ProofHub shows:
| Feature | Supported? |
|---|---|
| SAML SSO | ✓ Yes |
| SWA (password vaulting) | ✓ Yes |
| Create users | ✓ Yes (Group Push) |
| Update users | ✓ Yes |
| Deactivate users | ✓ Yes |
| Group sync | ✓ Yes |
| Schema Discovery | ✓ Yes |
Key limitation: Provisioning is only available through Okta's Group Push feature. If you're using Microsoft Entra ID, Google Workspace, or OneLogin, you have no automated provisioning options.
What's missing
ProofHub doesn't offer:
Bottom line: ProofHub's flat pricing model ($45-89/month for unlimited users) makes manual user management less painful than per-seat apps, but you're still stuck with manual processes unless you're exclusively using Okta.
What IT admins are saying
ProofHub's limited provisioning options create operational challenges for IT teams managing larger deployments:
- Manual user management despite having Okta integration
- No documented SCIM support for automated lifecycle management
- Dependency on Okta's Group Push feature limits multi-IdP flexibility
- Flat pricing structure can't justify advanced provisioning features
SAML and SWA via Okta. Group Push and Schema Discovery available.
ProofHub has Okta integration with Group Push for provisioning. Flat pricing makes it good for large teams.
The recurring theme
While ProofHub offers basic provisioning through Okta's Group Push, the lack of native SCIM means IT teams are locked into Okta-specific workflows and can't leverage other identity providers for automated user management.
The decision
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Small project team (<20 users) | Manual management acceptable with flat pricing |
| Growing agency with frequent contractor changes | Use Stitchflow: automation essential for turnover |
| Enterprise with multiple project teams (50+ users) | Use Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended |
| Using Okta with existing Group Push workflows | Consider native Okta integration first |
| Multi-IdP environment or using Entra/Google | Use Stitchflow: native integration unavailable |
The bottom line
ProofHub has no native SCIM. That means one more workflow gap in offboarding, access reviews, and license cleanup unless your team handles it another way.
Close the ProofHub workflow gap
ProofHub is one gap in a broader workflow. Stitchflow builds and maintains the offboarding, access review, or license workflow across every app in your environment.
Technical specifications
SCIM Version
Not specifiedSupported Operations
Not specifiedSupported Attributes
Plan requirement
Not specifiedPrerequisites
Not specifiedKey limitations
- Native SCIM not documented
- Provisioning via Okta integration
- Flat pricing (unlimited users)
Documentation not available.
Configuration for Okta
Integration type
Okta Integration Network (OIN) app
Prerequisite
SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.
Where to enable
Docs
SAML and SWA authentication. Group Push and Schema Discovery for provisioning.
Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.
Close the workflow gap in
ProofHub
ProofHub has no native SCIM. That leaves one more workflow gap in offboarding, access reviews, and license cleanup unless your team handles it another way.
Start with the free gap diagnostic


