Stitchflow
Builder.io logo

Builder.io SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Builder.io user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Builder.io, the visual CMS platform used by developers and content teams, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Builder.io provides SAML 2.0 SSO integration on their Enterprise tier with identity providers like Okta, Azure AD, and Google Workspace, this only handles authentication—not the automated provisioning and deprovisioning of user accounts. IT teams must manually create and manage user accounts in Builder.io, then separately assign appropriate permissions for different Spaces and projects.

This creates a significant operational gap for organizations using Builder.io across multiple content teams. Without SCIM, departing employees retain access to Builder.io Spaces until manually removed, creating security risks around content management systems that often contain sensitive marketing materials and website code. The manual overhead becomes particularly problematic when managing access across multiple Builder.io Spaces, each requiring individual permission management for developers, marketers, and content editors.

The strategic alternative

Stitchflow provides SCIM-level provisioning through resilient browser automation for Builder.io without requiring any custom development work. Works regardless of your Builder.io plan. Flat pricing under $5K/year, regardless of team size.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaNo SCIM available
Microsoft Entra IDNo SCIM available
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Builder.io accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Builder.io pricing problem

Builder.io gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Growth$19/month
Business$299/month
EnterpriseCustom pricing

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSCIM Support
Growth$19/month❌ Not available
Business$299/month❌ Not available
EnterpriseCustom pricing❌ Not available

Builder.io's Enterprise plan includes SAML SSO for identity verification, but all user provisioning, space assignments, and permission management must be handled manually through Builder.io's admin interface.

What this means in practice

Without SCIM provisioning, IT teams face ongoing manual work:

New hires
Create Builder.io accounts manually after SSO authentication
Project access
Assign users to specific Builder.io spaces through the web interface
Role changes
Update developer vs. editor permissions individually
Departures
Remember to manually remove access to Builder.io spaces

For content teams using Builder.io's visual CMS, this creates a disconnect between your IdP's user lifecycle and actual application access.

Additional constraints

Space-level permissions
Builder.io organizes content into "spaces" that require individual access assignments
Role complexity
Different permission levels (editors, developers, admins) need manual configuration
No automated cleanup
Departing employees may retain access to Builder.io spaces until manually removed
Audit gaps
No centralized visibility into who has access to which Builder.io projects

Summary of challenges

  • Builder.io does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Builder.io actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Enterprise plan)

Builder.io provides SAML 2.0 integration on their Enterprise plan:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsGoogle Workspace, Okta, Azure AD, generic SAML
Plan requirementEnterprise (custom pricing)
JIT provisioningNot supported
User managementManual account creation required

Critical gap: Builder.io does not offer SCIM provisioning. Their Enterprise plan includes SAML SSO for authentication, but all user provisioning and space access management must be handled manually through their admin interface.

What's missing for content teams

For organizations managing developers, marketers, and content editors across multiple Builder.io spaces, the current offering creates operational overhead:

No automated user provisioning
IT must manually create accounts for each team member
No group-based access control
Space permissions and editor vs developer roles require individual assignment
No deprovisioning automation
Offboarding requires manual account deactivation

This is particularly problematic for content teams with frequent contractor turnover or project-based access needs.

Enterprise plan bloat

Builder.io's Enterprise tier bundles SAML SSO with advanced features like:

Advanced analytics and performance monitoring
Custom CDN configurations
Dedicated customer success manager
Priority support and SLAs

Reality check: Most IT teams evaluating Builder.io for SCIM provisioning don't need performance analytics or dedicated CSMs - they just want automated user lifecycle management for their content workflows.

What IT admins are saying

Builder.io's lack of documented SCIM provisioning creates uncertainty for enterprise IT teams:

  • No public documentation on automated user provisioning capabilities
  • SAML SSO requires Enterprise pricing with custom quotes
  • Manual user management needed for content teams and developers
  • Unclear provisioning options for different user roles (editors vs developers)

"Contact vendor for enterprise features" appears across Builder.io's documentation, leaving IT teams without clear provisioning guidance before sales conversations.

The recurring theme

Builder.io offers SAML SSO on Enterprise plans but provides no public information about SCIM provisioning, forcing IT admins to navigate custom pricing discussions before understanding their automated provisioning options for content management workflows.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small content team (<10 users)Manual management is acceptable
Marketing team with stable membershipManual management with SSO for authentication
Content operations at scale (25+ users)Use Stitchflow: automation essential
Multi-brand organizations with complex permissionsUse Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended
Enterprise with frequent team changesUse Stitchflow: automation essential for efficiency

The bottom line

Builder.io offers SAML SSO on Enterprise plans but provides no documented SCIM provisioning capabilities. For content teams managing multiple spaces and complex editor/developer permissions at scale, Stitchflow delivers the automated provisioning that Builder.io simply doesn't offer.

Automate Builder.io without third-party complexity

Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning through resilient browser automation, backed by 24/7 human in the loop for Builder.io at <$5K/year, flat, regardless of team size.

Works alongside or instead of native SCIM
Syncs with your existing IdP (Okta, Entra ID, Google Workspace)
Automates onboarding and offboarding
SOC 2 Type II certified
24/7 human-in-the-loop monitoring
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

SCIM provisioning not documentedSAML SSO available (Google Workspace documented)Contact vendor for enterprise features

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • SCIM provisioning not documented
  • SAML SSO available (Google Workspace documented)
  • Contact vendor for enterprise features

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Builder.io

Builder.io doesn't offer SCIM. Get an enterprise-grade SCIM endpoint in your IdP, even without native support.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Builder.io logo
Builder.io
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Culture Amp logo

Culture Amp

No SCIM

Employee Engagement / People Analytics

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Culture Amp, the employee engagement and people analytics platform, explicitly does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. This is an intentional design decision - Culture Amp separates authentication (handled via SAML SSO) from employee data management (handled via HRIS integrations). While this approach works for their core HR use case, it creates a significant gap for IT teams managing user lifecycle across multiple SaaS applications through their identity provider. The lack of SCIM support means IT admins cannot automate user provisioning, deprovisioning, or attribute updates through standard identity governance workflows. Since Culture Amp contains sensitive employee feedback data and organizational hierarchy information that affects survey visibility, manual user management creates both security risks and operational overhead. Organizations are forced to rely on separate HRIS integrations or manual processes, breaking the unified provisioning model that most enterprises expect from their SaaS stack.

View full guide
Gladly logo

Gladly

No SCIM

Customer Service / Contact Center

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Gladly, the customer service platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Gladly offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration with enterprise identity providers like Okta and Azure AD, this only handles authentication—users must still be manually created in Gladly's admin panel before they can sign in via SSO. Even on Enterprise plans with custom pricing, there's no automated user lifecycle management, meaning IT teams must manually provision and deprovision every customer service agent. This creates a significant operational burden for contact centers, where staff turnover rates are notoriously high and seasonal scaling is common. Without automated provisioning, IT teams face delays onboarding new agents during peak seasons, and security risks from lingering accounts when agents leave. The manual process becomes particularly problematic for organizations running large support teams or multiple contact centers, where dozens of agents may need to be onboarded weekly.

View full guide
Iterable logo

Iterable

No SCIM

Marketing Automation

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Iterable, the marketing automation platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Iterable offers SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning that can create user accounts on first login, this creates a one-way flow that leaves IT teams without automated deprovisioning capabilities. Users who lose access in your identity provider won't be automatically removed from Iterable, requiring manual intervention to verify account status and revoke access within the platform itself. This creates a significant security gap for marketing teams using Iterable. When employees leave or change roles, their Iterable accounts remain active even after IdP access is revoked, potentially allowing continued access to customer data, campaign insights, and marketing automation workflows. For compliance-conscious organizations, this manual deprovisioning requirement creates audit trail gaps and increases the risk of data exposure from dormant accounts.

View full guide