Stitchflow
Hyperproof logo

Hyperproof SCIM guide

Native SCIM

How to automate Hyperproof user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Contact sales for Native SCIM

Summary and recommendation

Hyperproof supports native SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only on higher-tier plans with pricing that's entirely opaque. While the platform offers full SCIM capabilities through both Okta and Entra ID—including user provisioning, group management, and role assignment—you must contact sales for pricing, and implementation fees around $10K may apply. Most problematically, SSO subdomains must be manually provisioned by Hyperproof Support before SCIM can be enabled, creating deployment friction.

This creates a significant barrier for compliance teams that need automated user management. With Professional plans starting around $12K/year and Business around $25K/year (both without confirmed SCIM access), and Enterprise likely exceeding $50K/year, many organizations face substantial cost increases just to automate basic user lifecycle management in their GRC platform. The lack of transparent pricing makes budget planning impossible.

The strategic alternative

Hyperproof gates SCIM behind Contact vendor. Skip the Contact vendor plan upgrade and automate complete outcomes across your stack. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?Yes
SCIM tier requiredUnknown
SSO required first?Yes
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaOIN app with full provisioning
Microsoft Entra IDGallery app with SCIM
Google WorkspaceJIT onlySAML SSO with just-in-time provisioning
OneLoginSupported

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Hyperproof accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Hyperproof pricing problem

Hyperproof gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Plan Structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Professional~$12K/year
Business~$25K/year
Enterprise~$50K/year

Note: Hyperproof bundles SCIM exclusively with their Enterprise tier. Exact pricing varies by organization size and compliance workload - publicly listed prices are starting points.

What this means in practice

The tier jump to access SCIM represents substantial cost increases:

Current PlanUpgrade to EnterpriseAnnual Impact
Professional+~$38K/year317% increase
Business+~$25K/year100% increase
New customer$50K+ base costHigh barrier to entry

These figures represent minimum starting prices - actual enterprise costs typically run higher based on compliance scope and user count.

Additional constraints

Implementation complexity
SSO subdomain must be provisioned by Hyperproof Support before SCIM can be enabled, creating deployment dependencies.
Implementation fees
Additional ~$10K implementation fee may apply for Enterprise deployments.
No trial access
No free trial available to evaluate SCIM functionality before committing to enterprise pricing.
Opaque pricing
Tier requirements for SCIM not publicly disclosed, requiring sales engagement to understand true costs.
Bundled features
SCIM comes packaged with enterprise governance features you may not need, inflating the cost for pure provisioning requirements.

Summary of challenges

  • Hyperproof supports SCIM but only at Unknown tier (Enterprise (from ~$50K/year))
  • Google Workspace users get JIT provisioning only, not full SCIM
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What the upgrade actually includes

Hyperproof doesn't disclose which tier includes SCIM, but based on their enterprise-focused positioning, it's likely bundled with their higher-tier plans starting around $25K-50K/year:

SCIM automated provisioning
SAML single sign-on (SSO)
Advanced compliance workflow management
Custom framework templates
API access and integrations
Dedicated customer success manager
Professional services and implementation support
Advanced reporting and analytics
Multi-tenant workspace controls

Stitchflow Insight

The challenge: Hyperproof requires contacting sales for all pricing, and their focus is comprehensive compliance management rather than just identity. If you're already managing complex compliance programs, the full platform may justify the cost. But if you just need automated user provisioning for a growing security team, you're paying enterprise compliance software prices for basic identity management. We estimate ~60% of enterprise compliance features are irrelevant for teams that only need SCIM provisioning.

What IT admins are saying

Community sentiment on Hyperproof's SCIM implementation reveals frustration with opacity and complexity. Common complaints:

  • SCIM tier requirements hidden behind "contact sales" - no transparent pricing
  • SSO subdomain must be manually provisioned by support before SCIM setup
  • Starting prices around $50K/year put SCIM out of reach for smaller compliance teams
  • Implementation fees (~$10K) on top of already steep annual costs

Why do I need to talk to three different people just to find out if we can afford basic user provisioning? Just publish your SCIM requirements.

Reddit r/sysadmin

The subdomain provisioning step is annoying - you can't even test SCIM without going through their support queue first.

Spiceworks Community

The recurring theme

Hyperproof treats SCIM as an enterprise sales conversation rather than a standard identity feature, creating barriers for teams that just need automated user management.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
On Professional (~$12K/year), need SCIMUse Stitchflow: avoid the ~$38K+ tier jump to Enterprise
On Business (~$25K/year), need SCIMUse Stitchflow: avoid the ~$25K+ upgrade to Enterprise
Already on Enterprise with SCIMUse native SCIM: you're paying for it
Need Enterprise features beyond SCIMEvaluate Enterprise: SCIM comes bundled with compliance features
Small team, infrequent user changesManual may work: but monitor for compliance gaps in GRC workflows

The bottom line

Hyperproof's SCIM requires their Enterprise tier, creating a significant cost barrier for Professional and Business customers. For compliance teams that need provisioning automation without the Enterprise upgrade, Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning at a fraction of the cost.

Make Hyperproof workflows AI-native

Hyperproof gates SCIM behind Contact vendor. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

No Contact vendor upgrade required
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
We maintain the integration layer underneath
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

2.0

Supported Operations

Create, Update, Deactivate, Groups

Supported Attributes

Not specified

Plan requirement

Unknown

Prerequisites

SSO must be configured first

Key limitations

  • SCIM tier requirements not publicly disclosed
  • SSO subdomain must be provisioned by Hyperproof Support before enabling
  • No free trial available
  • Pricing varies significantly by organization size and compliance workload
  • Implementation fee of ~$10K may apply

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app with SCIM provisioning

Prerequisite

SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Hyperproof → Provisioning

Required credentials

SCIM endpoint URL and bearer token (generated in app admin console).

Configuration steps

Enable Create Users, Update User Attributes, and Deactivate Users.

Provisioning trigger

Okta provisions based on app assignments (users or groups).

Full SCIM support including user and group provisioning, role assignment via SCIM attributes

Hyperproof gates SCIM behind Contact vendor. Stitchflow automates complete workflows without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

Configuration for Entra ID

Integration type

Microsoft Entra Gallery app with SCIM provisioning

Prerequisite

SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.

Where to enable

Entra admin center → Enterprise applications → Hyperproof → Provisioning

Required credentials

Tenant URL (SCIM endpoint) and Secret token (bearer token from app admin console).

Configuration steps

Set Provisioning Mode = Automatic, configure SCIM connection.

Provisioning trigger

Entra provisions based on user/group assignments to the enterprise app.

Sync behavior

Entra provisioning runs on a scheduled cycle (typically every 40 minutes).

Full SCIM support with Entra ID including automatic user provisioning

Hyperproof gates SCIM behind Contact vendor. Stitchflow automates complete workflows without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

Unlock SCIM for
Hyperproof

Hyperproof gates SCIM behind Contact vendor plan. We automate complete offboarding and access reviews across your stack without that SCIM Tax upgrade, avoiding a 317% markup.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Hyperproof logo
Hyperproof
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Alteryx logo

Alteryx

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alteryx supports native SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans with custom pricing (7+ users minimum). The feature requires SSO (SAML or OIDC) to be configured first and completely overrides manual user management. For teams on Professional ($5,000/user/year) or Business ($10,000-$20,000/user/year) plans, accessing SCIM means upgrading to Enterprise - often a significant cost increase for functionality that should be table stakes. This creates a provisioning gap for most Alteryx deployments. Without automated user lifecycle management, IT teams face manual onboarding/offboarding workflows, delayed access provisioning, and compliance risks around orphaned accounts. The high per-user costs make Alteryx particularly expensive to scale, and forcing an Enterprise upgrade just for basic provisioning automation compounds that challenge.

View full guide
Atlan logo

Atlan

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Atlan supports native SCIM 2.0 provisioning with full user and group management capabilities. However, SCIM is only available on Enterprise tier, which requires custom pricing negotiations. Additionally, SSO must be enabled before SCIM can be configured, and Atlan's pricing tiers (Starter, Premier, Enterprise) are not publicly disclosed, making cost planning difficult for IT teams. This creates a significant barrier for organizations wanting automated provisioning without committing to enterprise-level contracts. For data teams evaluating Atlan, the lack of transparent pricing means you can't budget for provisioning capabilities upfront. The SSO prerequisite also forces organizations into a specific implementation sequence that may not align with their rollout timeline.

View full guide
Benchling logo

Benchling

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Benchling supports SCIM provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans with custom pricing that typically starts at $1M+ annually. This creates a massive barrier: organizations on Professional plans ($20,000+/year) face a 50x+ price increase to unlock automated user provisioning. Even mid-sized life sciences teams end up paying enterprise-level licensing just to automate basic user lifecycle management. The pricing gap is so extreme that most organizations either stick with manual provisioning or delay Benchling adoption entirely. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing researchers across multiple lab environments. Manual user provisioning in a platform that handles sensitive R&D data introduces compliance risks and delays researcher onboarding. When a scientist joins or leaves, IT must manually coordinate access across Benchling's complex permission structure for notebooks, entities, and workflows. For organizations with frequent collaborator access or seasonal research teams, this becomes unmanageable.

View full guide