Stitchflow
Index Exchange logo

Index Exchange SCIM guide

Native SCIM

How to automate Index Exchange user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM requires Custom plan

Summary and recommendation

Index Exchange supports SCIM 2.0, but only through Okta's identity provider and only on custom Enterprise plans with revenue-share pricing. The platform uses OIDC for SSO (not SAML) and has no native Microsoft Entra integration, creating significant gaps for organizations using multi-vendor identity stacks or standardized on Microsoft.

For advertising teams managing multiple vendor relationships, this Okta-only approach creates a provisioning bottleneck. IT teams running Entra or other identity providers face manual account management, while the custom pricing model makes budget planning difficult. Without automated deprovisioning across all identity providers, departing employees may retain access to advertising platforms handling sensitive campaign data and budgets.

The strategic alternative

Index Exchange gates SCIM behind Custom. Skip the Custom plan upgrade and automate complete outcomes across your stack. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?Yes
SCIM tier requiredCustom
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaOIN app with full provisioning
Microsoft Entra IDSSO only
Google WorkspaceJIT onlySAML SSO with just-in-time provisioning
OneLoginSupported

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Index Exchange accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Index Exchange pricing problem

Index Exchange gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
StandardCustom (revenue share)
EnterpriseCustom (revenue share)

Plan Structure

PlanPriceSCIM
StandardCustom (revenue share)
EnterpriseCustom (revenue share)

Note: Index Exchange operates on revenue-share pricing models with custom contract terms. SCIM provisioning requires enterprise-level agreements.

What this means in practice

Index Exchange's provisioning challenges center on platform and integration limitations rather than transparent pricing tiers:

Custom contract requirement
SCIM access requires negotiating enterprise terms with revenue share agreements
Okta dependency
Provisioning is primarily supported through Okta's integration, limiting IdP flexibility
No transparent pricing
Revenue share models make cost planning difficult compared to per-seat SaaS pricing

Additional constraints

IdP limitation
No native Microsoft Entra support found - provisioning primarily works through Okta integration.
SSO architecture
Uses OIDC instead of SAML, which may not align with existing SSO infrastructure.
Enterprise-only access
SCIM capabilities are bundled with enterprise contracts, making it inaccessible for smaller implementations.
Limited documentation
SCIM details are primarily available through Okta's integration page rather than comprehensive platform documentation.

Summary of challenges

  • Index Exchange supports SCIM but only at Custom tier (Custom (revenue share))
  • Google Workspace users get JIT provisioning only, not full SCIM
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What the upgrade actually includes

Index Exchange doesn't sell SCIM as a standalone service. It's bundled with their Enterprise advertising platform:

SCIM 2.0 automated provisioning (Okta only)
OIDC single sign-on (no SAML support)
Custom revenue share pricing
Dedicated account management
Advanced advertising analytics and reporting
Premium inventory access
White-glove platform onboarding

The challenge: Index Exchange operates on custom revenue share models, meaning SCIM access requires committing to their entire advertising platform. If you're not actively running programmatic advertising campaigns that justify revenue sharing, you're essentially paying platform fees just for user provisioning.

Stitchflow Insight

Additionally, their SCIM implementation is Okta-exclusive with no Microsoft Entra support, limiting your identity provider options. We estimate ~90% of Enterprise features are irrelevant for IT teams that simply need automated user lifecycle management.

What IT admins are saying

Community sentiment on Index Exchange's SCIM implementation reveals frustration with platform limitations and integration gaps. Common complaints:

  • OIDC-only SSO creates compatibility issues with SAML-first environments
  • Heavy reliance on Okta excludes organizations using other IdPs
  • No native Microsoft Entra support despite widespread enterprise adoption
  • Custom pricing model makes cost planning difficult for procurement teams

We're standardized on Entra and SAML across our ad tech stack. Index Exchange being OIDC-only with no Entra gallery app means we can't automate provisioning like we do with other platforms.

IT Director, Media Agency

The Okta dependency is problematic. We use Google Workspace as our primary IdP and having to maintain a separate Okta instance just for Index Exchange provisioning doesn't make financial sense.

Systems Administrator, AdTech Company

The recurring theme

Index Exchange's narrow integration focus forces organizations to either accept manual provisioning or maintain additional identity infrastructure they wouldn't otherwise need.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Need SCIM but not on Enterprise tierUse Stitchflow: avoid custom revenue share negotiations
Using Entra ID or Google WorkspaceUse Stitchflow: no native support outside Okta
On Enterprise but SCIM setup is complexUse Stitchflow: we handle the technical implementation
Already on Enterprise with working SCIMKeep native SCIM: you're paying for it
Small ad ops team, minimal user changesManual may work: but prepare for operational overhead

The bottom line

Index Exchange's SCIM is locked behind custom Enterprise pricing and only works with Okta, leaving most organizations without viable provisioning options. For teams that need automated user management without enterprise-level commitments, Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning that works with any IdP at predictable pricing.

Make Index Exchange workflows AI-native

Index Exchange gates SCIM behind Custom. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

No Custom upgrade required
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
We maintain the integration layer underneath
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

2.0

Supported Operations

Create, Update, Deactivate, Groups

Supported Attributes

Not specified

Plan requirement

Custom

Prerequisites

None

Key limitations

  • SSO via OIDC (not SAML)
  • Provisioning primarily through Okta
  • No native Entra support

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app with SCIM provisioning

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Index Exchange → Provisioning

Required credentials

SCIM endpoint URL and bearer token (generated in app admin console).

Configuration steps

Enable Create Users, Update User Attributes, and Deactivate Users.

Provisioning trigger

Okta provisions based on app assignments (users or groups).

Supports Create, Update, Deactivate, Attribute Sourcing via OIDC

Index Exchange gates SCIM behind Custom. Stitchflow automates complete workflows without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

Unlock SCIM for
Index Exchange

Index Exchange gates SCIM behind Custom plan. We automate complete offboarding and access reviews across your stack without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Index Exchange logo
Index Exchange
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Alteryx logo

Alteryx

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alteryx supports native SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans with custom pricing (7+ users minimum). The feature requires SSO (SAML or OIDC) to be configured first and completely overrides manual user management. For teams on Professional ($5,000/user/year) or Business ($10,000-$20,000/user/year) plans, accessing SCIM means upgrading to Enterprise - often a significant cost increase for functionality that should be table stakes. This creates a provisioning gap for most Alteryx deployments. Without automated user lifecycle management, IT teams face manual onboarding/offboarding workflows, delayed access provisioning, and compliance risks around orphaned accounts. The high per-user costs make Alteryx particularly expensive to scale, and forcing an Enterprise upgrade just for basic provisioning automation compounds that challenge.

View full guide
Atlan logo

Atlan

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Atlan supports native SCIM 2.0 provisioning with full user and group management capabilities. However, SCIM is only available on Enterprise tier, which requires custom pricing negotiations. Additionally, SSO must be enabled before SCIM can be configured, and Atlan's pricing tiers (Starter, Premier, Enterprise) are not publicly disclosed, making cost planning difficult for IT teams. This creates a significant barrier for organizations wanting automated provisioning without committing to enterprise-level contracts. For data teams evaluating Atlan, the lack of transparent pricing means you can't budget for provisioning capabilities upfront. The SSO prerequisite also forces organizations into a specific implementation sequence that may not align with their rollout timeline.

View full guide
Benchling logo

Benchling

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Benchling supports SCIM provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans with custom pricing that typically starts at $1M+ annually. This creates a massive barrier: organizations on Professional plans ($20,000+/year) face a 50x+ price increase to unlock automated user provisioning. Even mid-sized life sciences teams end up paying enterprise-level licensing just to automate basic user lifecycle management. The pricing gap is so extreme that most organizations either stick with manual provisioning or delay Benchling adoption entirely. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing researchers across multiple lab environments. Manual user provisioning in a platform that handles sensitive R&D data introduces compliance risks and delays researcher onboarding. When a scientist joins or leaves, IT must manually coordinate access across Benchling's complex permission structure for notebooks, entities, and workflows. For organizations with frequent collaborator access or seasonal research teams, this becomes unmanageable.

View full guide