Stitchflow
Infor logo

Infor SCIM guide

Native SCIM

How to automate Infor user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM requires Enterprise plan

Summary and recommendation

Infor supports native SCIM 2.0 provisioning with full functionality: create users, update attributes, deactivate users, group management, and schema discovery. However, SCIM is only available on Infor CloudSuite Enterprise plans, which start at $200+/user/month with implementation costs ranging from $500K to $5M. For organizations on lower-tier plans or running on-premise Infor deployments, there's no automated provisioning option.

This creates a massive barrier for mid-market organizations that need automated user lifecycle management but can't justify enterprise-level ERP spending. Without SCIM, IT teams face manual user provisioning in a complex ERP system that often requires specialized knowledge to configure roles and permissions correctly. The alternative—leaving users with persistent access after role changes—creates significant compliance and security risks in financial and operational systems.

The strategic alternative

Infor gates SCIM behind Enterprise. Skip the Enterprise plan upgrade and automate complete outcomes across your stack. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?Yes
SCIM tier requiredEnterprise
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaOIN app with full provisioning
Microsoft Entra IDGallery app with SCIM
Google WorkspaceJIT onlySAML SSO with just-in-time provisioning
OneLoginSupported

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Infor accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Infor pricing problem

Infor gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
ProCustom
BusinessCustom
Enterprise$200+/user/mo ($500K-$5M implementation)

Plan Structure

PlanPriceSCIM
ProCustom
BusinessCustom
Enterprise$200+/user/mo ($500K-$5M implementation)

Note: Pricing is custom and varies significantly based on modules, user count, and implementation complexity. The $500K-$5M implementation cost is separate from ongoing licensing fees.

What this means in practice

Enterprise pricing with implementation costs creates massive barriers:

Team SizeAnnual License CostImplementation CostTotal First Year
100 users$240,000+/year$500,000+$740,000+
250 users$600,000+/year$750,000+$1,350,000+
500 users$1,200,000+/year$1,000,000+$2,200,000+

This assumes minimum $200/user/month licensing. Many implementations exceed these estimates significantly.

Additional constraints

Cloud-only requirement
SCIM only works with Infor CloudSuite. On-premise versions have limited or no SCIM support.
Multi-tenant complexity
Organizations with multiple Infor tenants face complex configuration challenges for unified provisioning.
Implementation timeline
Enterprise implementations typically take 6-18 months, delaying SCIM availability.
Group limitations
SCIM-managed groups are separate from native Infor groups, creating management overhead.
Contract requirements
Enterprise licensing requires multi-year commitments with significant penalties for early termination.

Summary of challenges

  • Infor supports SCIM but only at Enterprise tier (Custom ($200+/user/mo, $500K-$5M implementation))
  • Google Workspace users get JIT provisioning only, not full SCIM
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What the upgrade actually includes

Infor doesn't sell SCIM as a standalone feature. It's exclusively available with Infor CloudSuite Enterprise implementations:

SCIM 2.0 automated provisioning and deprovisioning
SAML single sign-on (SSO)
Multi-tenant workspace management
Advanced role-based access controls
Compliance and audit reporting
Dedicated implementation and support team
Custom integration and configuration services
Enterprise-grade security certifications

The reality: You're looking at $500K-$5M implementation costs plus $200+/user/month for what amounts to basic user lifecycle management. Most organizations need 6-18 months just to complete the CloudSuite implementation before SCIM becomes available.

Stitchflow Insight

We estimate ~80% of CloudSuite Enterprise features are irrelevant for teams that simply need automated user provisioning. You're essentially buying a complete ERP transformation to get SCIM functionality that should cost a fraction of the total investment.

What IT admins are saying

Community sentiment on Infor's SCIM implementation reveals frustration with both cost barriers and complexity. Common complaints:

  • Enterprise-only SCIM availability with $200+/user/month pricing minimum
  • $500K-$5M implementation costs that make SCIM prohibitively expensive
  • Multi-tenant configuration complexity that requires extensive professional services
  • Cloud-only SCIM support leaving on-premise deployments without automation options

The implementation costs alone can hit $2-3 million before you even consider the per-user licensing. For SCIM provisioning, that's astronomical.

ERP Administrator, Reddit

Infor's multi-tenant setup is a nightmare. You need their professional services team just to configure basic user provisioning, and that's another six-figure expense.

IT Director, Spiceworks

The recurring theme

Infor treats SCIM as an enterprise luxury feature with implementation costs that can exceed $5 million, making automated provisioning financially unrealistic for most organizations.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
On lower Infor tiers, need SCIMUse Stitchflow: avoid the $500K-$5M Enterprise implementation
Using on-premise Infor versionsUse Stitchflow: limited SCIM support in on-premise deployments
CloudSuite but complex multi-tenant setupUse Stitchflow: skip the complex SCIM configuration requirements
Already on Enterprise CloudSuiteUse native SCIM: you've paid the premium for full integration
Small Infor deployment, low user churnManual may work: but monitor for compliance gaps in ERP access

The bottom line

Infor's SCIM requires Enterprise CloudSuite with implementation costs reaching $5M, making it accessible only to the largest organizations. For companies on lower tiers or on-premise versions, Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning without the massive Enterprise upgrade costs.

Make Infor workflows AI-native

Infor gates SCIM behind Enterprise. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

No Enterprise upgrade required
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
We maintain the integration layer underneath
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

2.0

Supported Operations

Create, Update, Deactivate, Groups

Supported Attributes

Not specified

Plan requirement

Enterprise

Prerequisites

None

Key limitations

  • SCIM requires Infor CloudSuite (cloud version)
  • On-premise versions have limited SCIM support
  • Complex multi-tenant configuration required
  • Enterprise pricing only with significant implementation costs
  • SCIM groups limited to groups created through SCIM

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app with SCIM provisioning

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Infor → Provisioning

Required credentials

SCIM endpoint URL and bearer token (generated in app admin console).

Configuration steps

Enable Create Users, Update User Attributes, and Deactivate Users.

Provisioning trigger

Okta provisions based on app assignments (users or groups).

Full SCIM provisioning: Create Users, Update User Attributes, Deactivate Users, Group Push, Schema Discovery.

Infor gates SCIM behind Enterprise. Stitchflow automates complete workflows without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

Configuration for Entra ID

Integration type

Microsoft Entra Gallery app with SCIM provisioning

Where to enable

Entra admin center → Enterprise applications → Infor → Provisioning

Required credentials

Tenant URL (SCIM endpoint) and Secret token (bearer token from app admin console).

Configuration steps

Set Provisioning Mode = Automatic, configure SCIM connection.

Provisioning trigger

Entra provisions based on user/group assignments to the enterprise app.

Sync behavior

Entra provisioning runs on a scheduled cycle (typically every 40 minutes).

Full automatic user provisioning via SCIM. Supports custom extension attributes for Infor-specific user properties.

Infor gates SCIM behind Enterprise. Stitchflow automates complete workflows without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

Unlock SCIM for
Infor

Infor gates SCIM behind Enterprise plan. We automate complete offboarding and access reviews across your stack without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Infor logo
Infor
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Alteryx logo

Alteryx

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alteryx supports native SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans with custom pricing (7+ users minimum). The feature requires SSO (SAML or OIDC) to be configured first and completely overrides manual user management. For teams on Professional ($5,000/user/year) or Business ($10,000-$20,000/user/year) plans, accessing SCIM means upgrading to Enterprise - often a significant cost increase for functionality that should be table stakes. This creates a provisioning gap for most Alteryx deployments. Without automated user lifecycle management, IT teams face manual onboarding/offboarding workflows, delayed access provisioning, and compliance risks around orphaned accounts. The high per-user costs make Alteryx particularly expensive to scale, and forcing an Enterprise upgrade just for basic provisioning automation compounds that challenge.

View full guide
Atlan logo

Atlan

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Atlan supports native SCIM 2.0 provisioning with full user and group management capabilities. However, SCIM is only available on Enterprise tier, which requires custom pricing negotiations. Additionally, SSO must be enabled before SCIM can be configured, and Atlan's pricing tiers (Starter, Premier, Enterprise) are not publicly disclosed, making cost planning difficult for IT teams. This creates a significant barrier for organizations wanting automated provisioning without committing to enterprise-level contracts. For data teams evaluating Atlan, the lack of transparent pricing means you can't budget for provisioning capabilities upfront. The SSO prerequisite also forces organizations into a specific implementation sequence that may not align with their rollout timeline.

View full guide
Benchling logo

Benchling

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Benchling supports SCIM provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans with custom pricing that typically starts at $1M+ annually. This creates a massive barrier: organizations on Professional plans ($20,000+/year) face a 50x+ price increase to unlock automated user provisioning. Even mid-sized life sciences teams end up paying enterprise-level licensing just to automate basic user lifecycle management. The pricing gap is so extreme that most organizations either stick with manual provisioning or delay Benchling adoption entirely. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing researchers across multiple lab environments. Manual user provisioning in a platform that handles sensitive R&D data introduces compliance risks and delays researcher onboarding. When a scientist joins or leaves, IT must manually coordinate access across Benchling's complex permission structure for notebooks, entities, and workflows. For organizations with frequent collaborator access or seasonal research teams, this becomes unmanageable.

View full guide