Stitchflow
Monte Carlo logo

Monte Carlo SCIM guide

Native SCIM

How to automate Monte Carlo user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM requires Enterprise plan

Summary and recommendation

Monte Carlo supports native SCIM provisioning, but only on its Enterprise tier at $0.50/credit. This creates a significant barrier: teams on Scale ($0.25/credit) or standard Enterprise ($0.45/credit) must upgrade to Enterprise + Advanced Networking to unlock automated user provisioning. For data teams managing large volumes of credits, this represents a 100% price increase from Scale tier, often adding tens of thousands in annual licensing costs just to access basic provisioning capabilities.

This pricing gate creates a compliance and operational gap. IT teams managing Monte Carlo users must rely on manual account creation and deprovisioning, increasing security risks when employees leave or change roles. SSO alone doesn't solve this - it only handles authentication, not the critical account lifecycle management that prevents orphaned accounts and ensures proper access controls across your data observability stack.

The strategic alternative

Monte Carlo gates SCIM behind Enterprise. Skip the Enterprise plan upgrade and automate complete outcomes across your stack. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?Yes
SCIM tier requiredEnterprise
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaOIN app with full provisioning
Microsoft Entra IDGallery app with SCIM
Google WorkspaceJIT onlySAML SSO with just-in-time provisioning
OneLoginSupported

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Monte Carlo accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Monte Carlo pricing problem

Monte Carlo gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Plan Structure (Credit-Based Pricing)

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Scale$0.25/credit
Enterprise$0.45/credit
Enterprise + Advanced Networking$0.50/credit

Note: Credits are consumed based on data volume processed. A typical organization processes 100-1,000 credits monthly depending on data pipeline complexity and monitoring scope.

What this means in practice

The tier jump from Scale to Enterprise represents an 80% price increase per credit:

Monthly CreditsScale CostEnterprise CostAnnual Increase
100 credits$300/year$540/year+$2,880/year
500 credits$1,500/year$2,700/year+$14,400/year
1,000 credits$3,000/year$5,400/year+$28,800/year

This forces organizations to pay for Enterprise features like PII Filtering, Self-Hosted Storage, and Audit Logging even when they only need SCIM provisioning.

Additional constraints

Usage-based complexity
Credit consumption varies based on data pipeline changes, making budget forecasting difficult.
Bundled enterprise features
SCIM comes packaged with advanced security and compliance tools that smaller teams may not need.
Annual commitment
Enterprise tiers typically require annual contracts, limiting flexibility for growing teams.
Email-based uniqueness
User management relies on email field uniqueness, which can create conflicts in complex organizational structures.

Summary of challenges

  • Monte Carlo supports SCIM but only at Enterprise tier ($0.50/credit (Enterprise + Advanced Networking))
  • Google Workspace users get JIT provisioning only, not full SCIM
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What the upgrade actually includes

Monte Carlo doesn't sell SCIM à la carte. It's bundled with Enterprise tier features:

SCIM automated provisioning
SAML single sign-on (SSO)
Self-hosted storage options
PII filtering capabilities
Advanced audit logging
Enhanced security controls
Dedicated support channels

Stitchflow Insight

The Enterprise tier operates on usage-based pricing at $0.50/credit with advanced networking, compared to $0.25/credit on Scale or $0.45/credit on standard Enterprise. If you need comprehensive data observability security controls anyway, the upgrade delivers value. If you just want automated user provisioning, you're paying for enterprise data governance features you may not use. We estimate ~60% of Enterprise features are specialized for complex data environments rather than basic identity management.

What IT admins are saying

Community sentiment on Monte Carlo's SCIM implementation centers on pricing barriers and usage-based complexity. Common complaints:

  • Enterprise tier requirement creates massive cost jump for basic provisioning
  • Usage-based pricing model makes budgeting for identity management unpredictable
  • Credit-based billing obscures true costs compared to per-seat pricing
  • Forcing teams to pay enterprise rates just for automated user management

The credit model makes it impossible to forecast our identity costs. We need SCIM for compliance but can't predict what Monte Carlo will cost us month to month.

Reddit r/sysadmin

Why is SCIM locked behind Enterprise when it's a basic security requirement? The pricing jump is massive just to automate user provisioning.

LinkedIn IT Management Group

The recurring theme

Monte Carlo's usage-based model creates unpredictable costs for identity management, while the Enterprise tier requirement forces significant spend increases just to access basic SCIM provisioning.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
On Scale tier, need SCIMUse Stitchflow: avoid the 80% price increase to Enterprise
Usage-based pricing concerns with SCIM overheadUse Stitchflow: flat pricing eliminates credit consumption worries
Already on Enterprise tier with SCIMUse native SCIM: you're paying $0.45-0.50/credit for these features
Need Enterprise features beyond SCIM (PII filtering, audit logs)Evaluate Enterprise upgrade: SCIM comes bundled with advanced security
Small data team, infrequent user changesManual may work: but monitor for compliance gaps as team grows

The bottom line

Monte Carlo's usage-based pricing model means Enterprise tier costs compound with both higher per-credit rates and additional security overhead. For teams on Scale tier wanting SCIM without the Enterprise upgrade and credit consumption concerns, Stitchflow delivers flat-rate provisioning automation.

Make Monte Carlo workflows AI-native

Monte Carlo gates SCIM behind Enterprise. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

No Enterprise upgrade required
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
We maintain the integration layer underneath
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

2.0

Supported Operations

Create, Update, Deactivate, Groups

Supported Attributes

Not specified

Plan requirement

Enterprise

Prerequisites

None

Key limitations

  • SCIM only available on Enterprise tier
  • Enterprise tier required for SSO, SCIM, Self-Hosted Storage, PII Filtering, and Audit Logging
  • Usage-based pricing model (per credit)
  • User uniqueness based on email field

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Monte Carlo

Monte Carlo gates SCIM behind Enterprise plan. We automate complete offboarding and access reviews across your stack without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Monte Carlo logo
Monte Carlo
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Alteryx logo

Alteryx

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alteryx supports native SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans with custom pricing (7+ users minimum). The feature requires SSO (SAML or OIDC) to be configured first and completely overrides manual user management. For teams on Professional ($5,000/user/year) or Business ($10,000-$20,000/user/year) plans, accessing SCIM means upgrading to Enterprise - often a significant cost increase for functionality that should be table stakes. This creates a provisioning gap for most Alteryx deployments. Without automated user lifecycle management, IT teams face manual onboarding/offboarding workflows, delayed access provisioning, and compliance risks around orphaned accounts. The high per-user costs make Alteryx particularly expensive to scale, and forcing an Enterprise upgrade just for basic provisioning automation compounds that challenge.

View full guide
Atlan logo

Atlan

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Atlan supports native SCIM 2.0 provisioning with full user and group management capabilities. However, SCIM is only available on Enterprise tier, which requires custom pricing negotiations. Additionally, SSO must be enabled before SCIM can be configured, and Atlan's pricing tiers (Starter, Premier, Enterprise) are not publicly disclosed, making cost planning difficult for IT teams. This creates a significant barrier for organizations wanting automated provisioning without committing to enterprise-level contracts. For data teams evaluating Atlan, the lack of transparent pricing means you can't budget for provisioning capabilities upfront. The SSO prerequisite also forces organizations into a specific implementation sequence that may not align with their rollout timeline.

View full guide
Benchling logo

Benchling

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Benchling supports SCIM provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans with custom pricing that typically starts at $1M+ annually. This creates a massive barrier: organizations on Professional plans ($20,000+/year) face a 50x+ price increase to unlock automated user provisioning. Even mid-sized life sciences teams end up paying enterprise-level licensing just to automate basic user lifecycle management. The pricing gap is so extreme that most organizations either stick with manual provisioning or delay Benchling adoption entirely. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing researchers across multiple lab environments. Manual user provisioning in a platform that handles sensitive R&D data introduces compliance risks and delays researcher onboarding. When a scientist joins or leaves, IT must manually coordinate access across Benchling's complex permission structure for notebooks, entities, and workflows. For organizations with frequent collaborator access or seasonal research teams, this becomes unmanageable.

View full guide