Stitchflow
Snyk logo

Snyk SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Snyk user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Snyk, the developer security platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. Instead, Enterprise customers can work with Snyk's account team to set up custom attribute mapping for user provisioning—a manual process that requires specific organizational naming conventions and ongoing coordination with Snyk support staff. Even SSO requires upgrading to the Enterprise plan, which starts around $5,000 annually and can exceed $70,000 for larger organizations. This means IT teams managing developer security workflows must either manually provision users or invest significant time working with Snyk's team to configure custom mapping that may break if organizational structures change.

For security-conscious engineering teams, this creates a problematic gap. Developer security tools like Snyk are critical for secure coding workflows, yet the lack of automated provisioning means new developers may experience access delays or existing team members may retain access longer than necessary when changing roles. Since Snyk integrates directly into development pipelines, these access management issues can impact both security compliance and developer productivity.

The strategic alternative

Stitchflow provides SCIM-level provisioning through resilient browser automation for Snyk without requiring Enterprise plan upgrades or custom mapping coordination. Works with any Snyk plan and any identity provider. Flat pricing under $5K/year, regardless of team size.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?Yes
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0, OIDC
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaSAML SSO supported via Okta. No native SCIM - uses custom attribute mapping for provisioning.
Microsoft Entra IDSAML/OIDC SSO supported. No native SCIM provisioning.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Snyk accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Snyk pricing problem

Snyk gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Free$0 (limited tests)
Team$25/developer/month
EnterpriseCustom ($5,000-$70,000+ annually)

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Free$0 (limited tests)
Team$25/developer/month
EnterpriseCustom ($5,000-$70,000+ annually)

What this means in practice

Enterprise requirement for any provisioning: Even basic SSO requires an Enterprise contract. For a 20-developer team, you're looking at upgrading from $6,000/year (Team plan) to a minimum $5,000-$70,000 Enterprise contract just to enable user management.

Custom mapping complexity: Snyk's provisioning relies on SAML attribute mapping rather than SCIM. This means:

Your organization names must follow Snyk's specific conventions
Role assignments happen through custom SAML attributes
Changes require coordination with your Snyk account team

No self-service provisioning: Unlike true SCIM implementations, you can't independently configure user provisioning rules or troubleshoot sync issues through your IdP.

Additional constraints

Account team dependency
Advanced provisioning configuration requires Snyk support involvement
Naming convention restrictions
Organization structure must align with Snyk's attribute mapping requirements
Limited automation
JIT provisioning available but with restricted access control options
Developer workflow impact
Security tool access delays can block development workflows when provisioning fails

Summary of challenges

  • Snyk does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Snyk actually offers for identity

SAML SSO + Custom Provisioning Mapping (Enterprise only)

Snyk doesn't support native SCIM. Instead, Enterprise customers get SAML/OIDC SSO with custom attribute mapping for user provisioning:

FeatureDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0, OIDC
JIT Provisioning✓ Yes
Custom Mapping✓ Yes (Enterprise + account team required)
SCIM API❌ No
Automated Deprovisioning❌ No
Group Sync❌ No

The reality: Snyk's "provisioning" is actually custom attribute mapping that requires working directly with your Snyk account team. This isn't automated SCIM—it's manual configuration that maps IdP attributes to Snyk organizations and roles.

What Enterprise gets you beyond identity

Advanced security features and vulnerability database
Container and infrastructure scanning
License compliance monitoring
API access and integrations
Dedicated customer success manager
Priority support

The math problem: You're paying $5,000-$70,000+ annually for Enterprise features when you might just need basic SCIM automation. For a security tool that should integrate seamlessly with your identity stack, requiring custom mapping assistance is a significant operational overhead.

Why custom mapping falls short

Manual setup
Requires coordination with Snyk's account team for configuration
Limited automation
No real-time sync for user lifecycle management
Rigid naming
Must follow specific organization naming conventions
No self-service
Changes require going through Snyk support

What IT admins are saying

Community sentiment on Snyk's provisioning reveals frustration with their Enterprise-only restrictions and lack of SCIM:

  • No native SCIM support despite being positioned as an enterprise security platform
  • Custom provisioning mapping requires expensive Enterprise plan and direct involvement from Snyk's account team
  • SSO functionality locked behind Enterprise pricing, forcing smaller teams to manage credentials manually
  • Manual user management creates security risks for a tool designed to improve security posture

No SCIM despite being enterprise security tool

Community feedback on Snyk's provisioning limitations

Must work with Snyk account team for advanced provisioning

IT admin describing the custom mapping process

The recurring theme

IT teams find it ironic that a security-focused developer tool lacks basic identity management capabilities unless you pay Enterprise prices and work directly with Snyk's sales team.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small security team (<10 developers)Manual management acceptable on Team plan
Growing development team (10-50 users)Use Stitchflow: avoid Enterprise pricing shock
Enterprise with budget for $70K+ security toolsConsider native Enterprise plan with custom mapping
Multi-org structure or complex team hierarchiesUse Stitchflow: custom mapping too restrictive
Need audit compliance for security tool accessUse Stitchflow: automation essential for SOC 2 requirements

The bottom line

Snyk forces you into expensive Enterprise pricing just to get basic provisioning capabilities, and even then you're stuck with custom mapping that requires their account team's involvement. For security-conscious organizations that need reliable user provisioning without the Enterprise price tag, Stitchflow delivers automated SCIM management at a fraction of the cost.

Automate Snyk without third-party complexity

Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning through resilient browser automation, backed by 24/7 human in the loop for Snyk at <$5K/year, flat, regardless of team size.

Works alongside or instead of native SCIM
Syncs with your existing IdP (Okta, Entra ID, Google Workspace)
Automates onboarding and offboarding
SOC 2 Type II certified
24/7 human-in-the-loop monitoring
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No native SCIM supportCustom mapping requires Enterprise plan and Snyk account team assistanceAuto-provisioning only available for Pilot or Enterprise plansSSO requires Enterprise plan

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No native SCIM support
  • Custom mapping requires Enterprise plan and Snyk account team assistance
  • Auto-provisioning only available for Pilot or Enterprise plans
  • SSO requires Enterprise plan

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Snyk

Snyk doesn't offer SCIM. Get an enterprise-grade SCIM endpoint in your IdP, even without native support.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Snyk logo
Snyk
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Culture Amp logo

Culture Amp

No SCIM

Employee Engagement / People Analytics

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Culture Amp, the employee engagement and people analytics platform, explicitly does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. This is an intentional design decision - Culture Amp separates authentication (handled via SAML SSO) from employee data management (handled via HRIS integrations). While this approach works for their core HR use case, it creates a significant gap for IT teams managing user lifecycle across multiple SaaS applications through their identity provider. The lack of SCIM support means IT admins cannot automate user provisioning, deprovisioning, or attribute updates through standard identity governance workflows. Since Culture Amp contains sensitive employee feedback data and organizational hierarchy information that affects survey visibility, manual user management creates both security risks and operational overhead. Organizations are forced to rely on separate HRIS integrations or manual processes, breaking the unified provisioning model that most enterprises expect from their SaaS stack.

View full guide
WordPress logo

WordPress

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

WordPress does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan, including WordPress VIP's enterprise offering that starts at $25,000/year minimum. While WordPress VIP supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, organizations requiring automated user provisioning must rely on third-party plugins like miniOrange's SCIM solution. This plugin dependency creates a significant gap for enterprise customers who need reliable, automated user lifecycle management across their WordPress ecosystem. The lack of native SCIM support means IT teams face ongoing plugin management overhead, potential security vulnerabilities from third-party code, and the risk of provisioning failures during WordPress updates. For organizations already investing $25K+ annually in WordPress VIP, having to cobble together provisioning through plugins represents a major architectural compromise. SSO alone doesn't address the manual work of creating, updating, and deprovisioning user accounts—leaving IT teams with time-consuming manual processes that don't scale with organizational growth.

View full guide
Workable logo

Workable

No SCIM

HR / Recruiting

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Workable, the applicant tracking system used by hiring teams, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Workable offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration starting with the Standard plan (plus add-on fees) or Premier plan, this only handles authentication—not user lifecycle management. Users granted access through SSO can join the Workable account automatically via JIT provisioning, but they still require manual job assignment and role configuration within the platform. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing hiring workflows across multiple departments. Without SCIM, administrators must manually provision recruiters and hiring managers, assign them to appropriate job requisitions, and remember to deprovision access when employees change roles or leave. For an ATS platform that handles sensitive candidate data and hiring decisions, this manual process introduces compliance risks and operational overhead that scales poorly as organizations grow.

View full guide