Stitchflow
StackAdapt logo

StackAdapt SCIM guide

Native SCIM

How to automate StackAdapt user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Contact sales for Native SCIM

Summary and recommendation

StackAdapt supports native SCIM provisioning, but only through Okta integration and likely requires their Enterprise tier (estimated at ~$30,000/month for 100 users). While the Okta integration includes advanced features like Group Push and Schema Discovery, this creates a significant barrier: teams using Microsoft Entra, Google Workspace, or other identity providers are completely locked out of automated provisioning, forcing manual user management for an expensive programmatic advertising platform.

The real-world impact is substantial. Marketing teams using StackAdapt handle sensitive campaign data and substantial ad spend budgets. Without automated deprovisioning when employees leave, you're left with orphaned accounts that retain access to campaigns, budgets, and performance data. Manual processes create compliance gaps and security risks that scale poorly as your marketing organization grows.

The strategic alternative

StackAdapt gates SCIM behind Contact Sales. Skip the Contact Sales plan upgrade and automate complete outcomes across your stack. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?Yes
SCIM tier requiredUnknown
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaOIN app with full provisioning
Microsoft Entra IDSSO only
Google WorkspaceJIT onlySAML SSO with just-in-time provisioning
OneLoginSupported

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages StackAdapt accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The StackAdapt pricing problem

StackAdapt gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Basic~$500/mo (1 user)
Pro~$4,000/mo (10 users)
Enterprise~$30,000/mo (100 users)

Plan Structure

PlanPriceSCIM
Basic~$500/mo (1 user)
Pro~$4,000/mo (10 users)
Enterprise~$30,000/mo (100 users)

Note: StackAdapt uses custom pricing based on advertising spend and team size. SCIM provisioning is only available at the Enterprise tier.

What this means in practice

The jump to Enterprise pricing for SCIM access creates substantial cost increases:

Current PlanEnterprise Upgrade CostAnnual Impact
Pro (10 users)+$26,000/mo+$312,000/year
Mid-tier (50 users)Contact for pricing$400,000+/year estimated

These calculations reflect the significant pricing gap between Pro and Enterprise tiers, driven by StackAdapt's advertiser-focused pricing model.

Additional constraints

Custom pricing only
No transparent pricing - all contracts require sales negotiation.
Okta dependency
SCIM provisioning only works through Okta - no support for Microsoft Entra or other IdPs.
Advertising spend minimums
Enterprise contracts typically include substantial ad spend commitments beyond platform fees.
Annual contracts
Enterprise access requires long-term commitments with limited flexibility.

Summary of challenges

  • StackAdapt supports SCIM but only at Unknown tier (Custom (~$30,000/mo for 100 users))
  • Google Workspace users get JIT provisioning only, not full SCIM
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What the upgrade actually includes

StackAdapt doesn't sell SCIM à la carte. It's bundled with their Enterprise tier and comes with:

SCIM automated provisioning (via Okta only)
Group Push and Group Linking
Advanced user role management
Enhanced security controls
Dedicated account management
Premium support tiers
Advanced campaign analytics
White-label reporting options

The reality: StackAdapt's SCIM only works with Okta, leaving Microsoft Entra and Google Workspace customers without automated provisioning options. Even if you're on Okta, you're forced into Enterprise pricing (~$30,000/month for 100 users) just to get basic user lifecycle management.

Stitchflow Insight

If you need comprehensive campaign management tools anyway, the upgrade makes sense. If you just want automated user provisioning that works with any IdP, you're paying enterprise prices for a limited, single-vendor solution. We estimate ~80% of Enterprise features are irrelevant for teams that only need reliable SCIM provisioning across all major identity providers.

What IT admins are saying

Community sentiment on StackAdapt's SCIM limitations is mixed, with particular frustration around platform restrictions. Common complaints:

  • SCIM provisioning only works through Okta, leaving Entra ID and Google Workspace users without options
  • No documented Microsoft integration despite enterprise pricing tiers
  • Custom pricing model makes it difficult to budget for identity management features
  • Lack of clear documentation on SCIM capabilities and requirements

We're paying enterprise prices but can't get basic provisioning to work with our Microsoft environment. Had to fall back to manual user management.

IT Director, Marketing Agency

StackAdapt's Okta integration works fine, but we're an Entra shop. Would love to see them expand beyond just one IdP.

System Administrator, AdTech Company

The recurring theme

StackAdapt's SCIM support is platform-dependent, creating provisioning gaps for organizations not using Okta as their primary identity provider.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
On Pro plan (~$4K/mo), need SCIMUse Stitchflow: avoid the 7.5x jump to Enterprise
Using non-Okta IdP (Entra, Google Workspace, OneLogin)Use Stitchflow: native SCIM only works with Okta
Already on Enterprise with OktaUse native SCIM: you're paying $30K+/mo, use what's included
Need Enterprise features beyond SCIMEvaluate Enterprise: SCIM comes bundled with the tier
Small team, infrequent user changesManual may work: but watch for access sprawl as you scale

The bottom line

StackAdapt gates SCIM behind Contact Sales. Stitchflow automates complete workflows without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

Make StackAdapt workflows AI-native

StackAdapt gates SCIM behind Contact Sales. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

No Contact Sales upgrade required
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
We maintain the integration layer underneath
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

2.0

Supported Operations

Create, Update, Deactivate, Groups

Supported Attributes

Not specified

Plan requirement

Unknown

Prerequisites

None

Key limitations

  • SCIM provisioning available via Okta
  • Supports Group Push and Group Linking
  • Cost-per-engagement pricing model ($3.50 starting)
  • No minimum spend required
  • No free trial

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app with SCIM provisioning

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → StackAdapt → Provisioning

Required credentials

SCIM endpoint URL and bearer token (generated in app admin console).

Configuration steps

Enable Create Users, Update User Attributes, and Deactivate Users.

Provisioning trigger

Okta provisions based on app assignments (users or groups).

Supports SSO and provisioning including Group Push, Group Linking, Schema Discovery, Attribute Writeback

StackAdapt gates SCIM behind Contact Sales. Stitchflow automates complete workflows without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

Unlock SCIM for
StackAdapt

StackAdapt gates SCIM behind Contact Sales plan. We automate complete offboarding and access reviews across your stack without that SCIM Tax upgrade.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
StackAdapt logo
StackAdapt
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Alteryx logo

Alteryx

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alteryx supports native SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans with custom pricing (7+ users minimum). The feature requires SSO (SAML or OIDC) to be configured first and completely overrides manual user management. For teams on Professional ($5,000/user/year) or Business ($10,000-$20,000/user/year) plans, accessing SCIM means upgrading to Enterprise - often a significant cost increase for functionality that should be table stakes. This creates a provisioning gap for most Alteryx deployments. Without automated user lifecycle management, IT teams face manual onboarding/offboarding workflows, delayed access provisioning, and compliance risks around orphaned accounts. The high per-user costs make Alteryx particularly expensive to scale, and forcing an Enterprise upgrade just for basic provisioning automation compounds that challenge.

View full guide
Atlan logo

Atlan

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Atlan supports native SCIM 2.0 provisioning with full user and group management capabilities. However, SCIM is only available on Enterprise tier, which requires custom pricing negotiations. Additionally, SSO must be enabled before SCIM can be configured, and Atlan's pricing tiers (Starter, Premier, Enterprise) are not publicly disclosed, making cost planning difficult for IT teams. This creates a significant barrier for organizations wanting automated provisioning without committing to enterprise-level contracts. For data teams evaluating Atlan, the lack of transparent pricing means you can't budget for provisioning capabilities upfront. The SSO prerequisite also forces organizations into a specific implementation sequence that may not align with their rollout timeline.

View full guide
Benchling logo

Benchling

SCIM Tax
SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Benchling supports SCIM provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans with custom pricing that typically starts at $1M+ annually. This creates a massive barrier: organizations on Professional plans ($20,000+/year) face a 50x+ price increase to unlock automated user provisioning. Even mid-sized life sciences teams end up paying enterprise-level licensing just to automate basic user lifecycle management. The pricing gap is so extreme that most organizations either stick with manual provisioning or delay Benchling adoption entirely. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing researchers across multiple lab environments. Manual user provisioning in a platform that handles sensitive R&D data introduces compliance risks and delays researcher onboarding. When a scientist joins or leaves, IT must manually coordinate access across Benchling's complex permission structure for notebooks, entities, and workflows. For organizations with frequent collaborator access or seasonal research teams, this becomes unmanageable.

View full guide