Stitchflow
Almanac logo

Almanac SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Almanac user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Almanac, the documentation and workflow template platform, offers SCIM provisioning exclusively through their Enterprise plan with custom pricing. While they provide Okta integration with SAML SSO and SCIM support, there's no public documentation for SCIM capabilities, and you must contact their sales team directly to access enterprise features. This creates a black box situation where IT teams can't evaluate provisioning capabilities or understand limitations before committing to enterprise pricing discussions.

The lack of transparent SCIM documentation is particularly problematic for documentation platforms like Almanac, where user access often spans multiple teams and departments. Without clear provisioning capabilities, IT teams face manual user management across what should be a centralized knowledge base, creating security gaps and administrative overhead that scales poorly as organizations grow.

The strategic alternative

Almanac has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaVia third-partyOIN app supports authentication and provisioning. Features: Schema Discovery, Attribute Writeback. Supports SAML and SWA authentication. Dedicated help center docs at helpcenter.almanac.io.
Microsoft Entra IDVia third-partyNo Microsoft Entra ID integration documented. Okta is the only documented IdP for SCIM provisioning.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Almanac accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Almanac pricing problem

Almanac gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Free$0 (up to 50 documents)
Pro$12-15/user/month
EnterpriseCustom pricing

Pricing structure

PlanPricingSCIMSSO
Free$0 (up to 50 documents)❌ Not available❌ Not available
Pro$12-15/user/month❌ Not available❌ Not available
EnterpriseCustom pricing✓ Via Okta only✓ SAML 2.0

Enterprise pricing reality

Must contact Almanac directly for quotes
No public documentation of enterprise features or costs
SSO and provisioning bundled into custom enterprise contracts

What this means in practice

For small teams (under 10 users): You'll pay $1,440-$1,800/year on Pro plans but get zero automation. Every user addition, removal, or access change requires manual intervention.

For growing teams (10-50 users): The jump to Enterprise pricing creates a cost cliff. You're forced into custom contracts that could be 3-5x your Pro plan costs just to get basic provisioning capabilities.

For established organizations: Even with Enterprise contracts, you're locked into Okta-only SCIM support, creating vendor dependency issues if you use other identity providers.

Additional constraints

Single IdP dependency
SCIM only works through Okta integration, no support for Entra ID, Google Workspace, or OneLogin
Documentation gaps
Enterprise SSO/SCIM features aren't publicly documented, requiring sales calls for basic technical specifications
Manual fallback required
No JIT provisioning means failed SCIM sync events require manual user creation
Template access complexity
Documentation tools typically need granular access controls that manual provisioning can't efficiently manage

Summary of challenges

  • Almanac does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Almanac actually offers for identity

Enterprise Plan Features (Custom Pricing)

Almanac gates all identity management features behind their Enterprise plan with custom pricing. Based on available documentation, the Enterprise tier includes:

FeatureDetails
SAML SSOSAML 2.0 with JIT provisioning
SCIM ProvisioningVia Okta only (documented)
Supported IdPsOkta (confirmed), others unknown
User ManagementAutomated via SCIM when available

Okta Integration (Enterprise Only)

The Okta Integration Network listing shows Almanac supports:

Authentication
SAML 2.0 and SWA (password vaulting)
Provisioning
SCIM with schema discovery and attribute writeback
Features
Create users, update users, deactivate users, group management

Major limitation: SCIM provisioning is only documented for Okta. There's no public information about Microsoft Entra ID, Google Workspace, or OneLogin support.

What's Missing

For most teams evaluating Almanac's identity features:

No transparent pricing
Must contact sales for Enterprise costs
Single IdP support
Only Okta SCIM is documented
Limited documentation
Enterprise features aren't publicly detailed
Overkill bundling
Enterprise likely includes numerous features unrelated to identity management

The reality: You're paying enterprise prices for basic SCIM functionality that should be standard in any business documentation tool.

What IT admins are saying

Almanac's enterprise provisioning features remain opaque for IT teams evaluating documentation platforms:

  • Enterprise SCIM capabilities aren't publicly documented, forcing IT teams to contact sales for basic technical details
  • Limited IdP support with only Okta integration documented, leaving Entra ID and Google Workspace users uncertain
  • No clear pricing transparency for enterprise features that include automated provisioning
  • Manual user management required for teams not on enterprise plans, even with SSO enabled

"Must contact vendor for enterprise features" consistently appears across provisioning research, indicating Almanac keeps their automation capabilities behind closed doors until you're deep in their sales process.

The recurring theme

IT teams can't properly evaluate Almanac's provisioning capabilities without entering a sales cycle, making it difficult to budget or plan implementations compared to platforms with transparent enterprise documentation.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small documentation team (<20 users)Manual management with SAML SSO if available
Growing operations team with frequent changesUse Stitchflow: automation prevents access sprawl
Enterprise with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automated audit trail essential
Multi-department knowledge baseUse Stitchflow: manual provisioning doesn't scale
Using non-Okta IdP (Entra, Google, OneLogin)Use Stitchflow: only Okta has documented SCIM

The bottom line

Almanac's enterprise SCIM capabilities are undocumented and only work with Okta, leaving most organizations in a provisioning black box. For teams that need reliable, cross-IdP automation for their documentation workflows, Stitchflow delivers the transparency and control that Almanac's native approach lacks.

Make Almanac workflows AI-native

Almanac has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No public SCIM documentation foundMust contact vendor for enterprise features

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No public SCIM documentation found
  • Must contact vendor for enterprise features

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Almanac → Sign On

OIN app supports authentication and provisioning. Features: Schema Discovery, Attribute Writeback. Supports SAML and SWA authentication. Dedicated help center docs at helpcenter.almanac.io.

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
Almanac

Almanac has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Almanac logo
Almanac
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide