Stitchflow
Autotask PSA logo

Autotask PSA SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Autotask PSA user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Autotask PSA (now part of the Datto/Kaseya portfolio) does not offer native SCIM provisioning capabilities. While SCIM-like functionality is available through Okta's integration in the Okta Integration Network, this creates a vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning workflow is entirely dependent on Okta. For MSPs using other identity providers like Entra ID or Google Workspace, there's no automated provisioning option—despite Autotask supporting SAML 2.0 and OIDC SSO across these platforms. Given that Autotask starts at $50/user/month with additional module costs, the lack of universal SCIM support is a significant gap.

This limitation is particularly problematic for MSPs where technicians, project managers, and billing staff need different role-based access to client financial data within the PSA. Manual user provisioning creates compliance risks when technicians should only access specific client accounts, while SSO alone doesn't handle the complex role assignments that MSP workflows require. The Okta-only provisioning approach forces organizations to either accept manual processes or commit to a single identity provider ecosystem.

The strategic alternative

Autotask PSA has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?Yes
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0, OAuth, OIDC
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaNo SCIM available
Microsoft Entra IDNo SCIM available
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Autotask PSA accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Autotask PSA pricing problem

Autotask PSA gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Manual provisioningHigh
Staff time
Okta integrationMedium
Okta Enterprise required
Third-party automationLow
Additional vendor costs

Provisioning options

MethodReliabilityIdP SupportCost Impact
Manual provisioningHighAll IdPsStaff time
Okta integrationMediumOkta onlyOkta Enterprise required
Third-party automationLowVariesAdditional vendor costs

Autotask pricing context

Plans start at $50/user/month
Module-based pricing adds significant costs
Part of larger Kaseya ecosystem with bundled pricing

What this means in practice

For Okta shops: You can use automated provisioning, but you're locked into Okta's reliability and pricing. If Okta's integration breaks or becomes unavailable, you're back to manual processes.

For Entra/Google Workspace users: No automated provisioning options. Every new MSP technician, project manager, or billing user must be manually created in Autotask, then have their roles and permissions configured individually.

For multi-IdP environments: You can't standardize on one provisioning approach across your SaaS stack, creating operational complexity.

Additional constraints

PSA security requirements
MSP platforms contain sensitive client financial data, making manual provisioning errors particularly costly
Role complexity
Autotask has department-specific roles (technician, dispatch, billing) that require precise assignment during onboarding
Okta dependency
The only automation path requires Okta Enterprise licensing and creates vendor lock-in
Kaseya ecosystem
Integration complexity increases as Autotask becomes part of broader Kaseya platform bundles

Summary of challenges

  • Autotask PSA does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Autotask PSA actually offers for identity

SCIM Provisioning (Okta integration only)

Autotask PSA doesn't offer native SCIM but provides SCIM-based provisioning through the Okta Integration Network:

FeatureSupported?
Create users✓ Yes (via Okta)
Update user attributes✓ Yes (via Okta)
Deactivate users✓ Yes (via Okta)
Group linking✓ Yes (via Okta)
Schema discovery✓ Yes (via Okta)
Entra ID provisioning❌ No
Google Workspace provisioning❌ No
OneLogin provisioning❌ No

Critical limitation: SCIM provisioning is exclusively available through Okta. Organizations using Entra ID, Google Workspace, or OneLogin have no automated provisioning path.

SSO Options (All plans)

ProtocolSupported IdPs
SAML 2.0Okta, Entra ID, custom SAML providers
OIDCOkta, Entra ID, custom OIDC providers
Just-in-time provisioning✓ Yes

The Okta lock-in problem

For MSPs managing sensitive client data and billing information, automated provisioning is essential for security and compliance. Autotask's Okta-only SCIM support creates a vendor lock-in scenario where your identity provider choice determines your provisioning capabilities.

Organizations already committed to Entra ID or Google Workspace face manual user management—a significant security risk in PSA environments containing financial and client data.

What IT admins are saying

Community sentiment on Autotask PSA's provisioning reveals frustration with the Okta-only SCIM approach and complex Kaseya ecosystem integration:

  • SCIM provisioning only works through Okta integration, leaving Azure AD and other IdP users with manual processes
  • Complex pricing structure as part of the broader Kaseya/Datto bundle makes cost planning difficult
  • Integration complexity increases when managing the full PSA platform across multiple client environments
  • No native SCIM support means you're locked into specific identity provider workflows

Complex pricing as part of Kaseya bundle

Community feedback on MSP forums

Integration complexity

Recurring theme in implementation discussions

The recurring theme

MSPs need reliable, cross-platform provisioning for their PSA system since it contains sensitive client financial data and requires precise role-based access, but Autotask's Okta-dependent approach leaves many organizations managing user lifecycles manually across their most critical business application.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small MSP (<10 technicians)Manual management acceptable, focus on SSO setup
Using Okta with existing SCIM requirementsTry Okta's native integration first
Multi-location MSP with frequent tech turnoverUse Stitchflow: automation essential for scaling
Enterprise MSP with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: audit trail and automation critical
Using Entra ID or Google WorkspaceUse Stitchflow: native integration gaps require workarounds

The bottom line

Autotask PSA offers SCIM provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—leaving Entra ID and Google Workspace users without automated options. For MSPs managing technician access across multiple client environments, Stitchflow eliminates the IdP dependency and provides consistent automation regardless of your identity provider.

Make Autotask PSA workflows AI-native

Autotask PSA has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

SCIM via Okta integration primarilyEnterprise pricing requiredPart of larger Kaseya ecosystem

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • SCIM via Okta integration primarily
  • Enterprise pricing required
  • Part of larger Kaseya ecosystem

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Prerequisite

SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Autotask PSA → Sign On

Enterprise required for SCIM

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
Autotask PSA

Autotask PSA has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Autotask PSA logo
Autotask PSA
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide