Summary and recommendation
Balsamiq Cloud, the wireframing and UX design platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Balsamiq offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration (available on Enterprise plans at $599/month) with identity providers like Okta and Azure AD, this only handles authentication through Just-in-Time (JIT) provisioning. When SSO is enabled, all authenticated users automatically become Staff Members within the Space, creating a significant access control limitation. Manual user management and deprovisioning remain required, and there's no way to programmatically control project-level permissions or Space access.
This creates substantial operational overhead for design teams, particularly those working across multiple projects with varying stakeholder access requirements. IT administrators must manually remove users from Spaces when they leave the organization or change roles, creating compliance gaps and potential security exposure to sensitive design assets and project information.
The strategic alternative
Balsamiq has no native SCIM. That leaves a workflow gap in offboarding, access reviews, and license cleanup unless your team handles the app another way. Stitchflow builds and maintains the IT workflows your team still runs manually, across every app, including the ones without APIs.
Quick SCIM facts
| SCIM available? | No |
| SCIM tier required | N/A |
| SSO required first? | No |
| SSO available? | Yes |
| SSO protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Documentation | Not available |
Supported identity providers
| IdP | SSO | SCIM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta | ✓ | ❌ | No SCIM available |
| Microsoft Entra ID | ✓ | ❌ | No SCIM available |
| Google Workspace | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
| OneLogin | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
The cost of not automating
Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Balsamiq accounts manually. Here's what that costs:
The Balsamiq pricing problem
Balsamiq gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.
Tier comparison
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Projects | $12/month | ||
| Business | $399/month (up to 400 projects) | ||
| Enterprise | $599/month |
Pricing and provisioning options
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Projects | $12/month | ||
| Business | $399/month (up to 400 projects) | ||
| Enterprise | $599/month |
What this means in practice
Without SCIM provisioning, IT teams face these operational challenges:
User lifecycle management
Access control limitations
Audit and compliance gaps
Additional constraints
Summary of challenges
- Balsamiq does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
- Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
- Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually
What Balsamiq actually offers for identity
SAML SSO (Enterprise plan - $599/month)
Balsamiq Cloud supports SAML 2.0 integration with identity providers:
| Setting | Details |
|---|---|
| Protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Supported IdPs | Okta, Google Workspace, Azure AD, ADFS, generic SAML |
| Configuration | Per-Space configuration by Space Owner |
| User provisioning | Just-in-time (JIT) creation only |
| User roles | All SSO users become Staff Members |
Critical limitation: When SSO is enabled, all authenticated users automatically become Staff Members with full access to the Space. There's no granular role assignment through SSO.
Okta Integration (via OIN)
The official Okta Integration Network listing for Balsamiq shows:
| Feature | Supported? |
|---|---|
| SAML SSO | ✓ Yes |
| OIDC SSO | ❌ No |
| Create users | ✓ JIT only |
| Update users | ❌ No |
| Deactivate users | ❌ No |
| Group push | ❌ No |
| SCIM provisioning | ❌ No |
What's missing
For UX design teams that need to manage access across multiple projects and ensure proper offboarding, the lack of automated provisioning creates significant administrative overhead.
What IT admins are saying
Balsamiq's lack of SCIM provisioning forces IT teams into manual user management workflows:
- No automated user provisioning - all users must be managed manually
- SAML JIT provisioning automatically makes all users "Staff Members" regardless of intended role
- Space Owners (not IT admins) must configure SSO settings for each Space
- Manual deprovisioning required when employees leave
"No SCIM for automated provisioning" and "Manual user management required" are consistent complaints from the community about Balsamiq's limited identity management capabilities.
When SSO enabled, all users become Staff Members
The recurring theme
Even at the Enterprise tier ($599/month), Balsamiq relies entirely on SAML JIT provisioning with no granular role assignment or automated deprovisioning. IT teams must coordinate with Space Owners for SSO configuration and handle all user lifecycle management manually.
The decision
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Small UX team (<10 users) with stable membership | Manual management with SAML SSO is workable |
| Design team using multiple wireframing tools | Consider alternatives with native SCIM support |
| Growing product organization (20+ users) | Use Stitchflow: automated provisioning essential |
| Enterprise with compliance requirements | Use Stitchflow: manual deprovisioning creates audit gaps |
| Multi-project teams with frequent access changes | Use Stitchflow: Space-based permissions need automation |
The bottom line
Balsamiq has no native SCIM. That means one more workflow gap in offboarding, access reviews, and license cleanup unless your team handles it another way.
Close the Balsamiq workflow gap
Balsamiq is one gap in a broader workflow. Stitchflow builds and maintains the offboarding, access review, or license workflow across every app in your environment.
Technical specifications
SCIM Version
Not specifiedSupported Operations
Not specifiedSupported Attributes
Plan requirement
Not specifiedPrerequisites
Not specifiedKey limitations
- No native SCIM provisioning documented
- When SSO enabled, all users become Staff Members
- Space Owner must configure SSO
- SAML-based authentication only
Documentation not available.
Configuration for Okta
Integration type
Okta Integration Network (OIN) app
Where to enable
Docs
Custom required for SCIM
Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.
Close the workflow gap in
Balsamiq
Balsamiq has no native SCIM. That leaves one more workflow gap in offboarding, access reviews, and license cleanup unless your team handles it another way.
Start with the free gap diagnostic


