Stitchflow
GetAccept logo

GetAccept SCIM guide

Native SCIM

How to automate GetAccept user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM requires Enterprise plan

Summary and recommendation

GetAccept supports SCIM provisioning for automated user management, but only on Enterprise plans with custom pricing. This creates a significant barrier for sales teams on the more affordable eSign ($25/user/month) or Professional plans ($39-79/user/month) who need automated provisioning as they scale their digital sales operations.

The pricing gap is substantial. Moving from eSign to Enterprise represents a major cost increase that's often unjustifiable just to unlock provisioning automation. For growing sales teams, this creates a manual user management burden precisely when they need efficiency most—during rapid hiring cycles or territory reorganizations where sales reps need immediate access to close deals.

The strategic alternative

GetAccept gates SCIM behind Enterprise. That can unlock provisioning, but it still does not complete the offboarding, access review, or license workflow across the rest of your stack. Stitchflow builds and maintains the IT workflows your team still runs manually, across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?Yes
SCIM tier requiredEnterprise
SSO required first?Yes
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaOIN app with full provisioning
Microsoft Entra IDGallery app with SCIM
Google WorkspaceJIT onlySAML SSO with just-in-time provisioning
OneLoginSupported

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages GetAccept accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The GetAccept pricing problem

GetAccept gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Plan Structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
eSign$25/user/mo
DealRoom Professional$39/user/mo
ContractRoom Professional$49/user/mo
FullSuite Professional$79/user/mo
EnterpriseCustom

Note: Professional+ plans require annual billing. Only Enterprise includes SAML SSO and SCIM provisioning.

What this means in practice

Since Enterprise pricing is custom, expect significant cost increases over the $79/user/month FullSuite Professional plan. Based on typical SaaS enterprise pricing patterns:

Team SizeEstimated Annual Impact
25 sales reps$35,000+ additional cost
50 sales reps$70,000+ additional cost
100 sales reps$140,000+ additional cost

These estimates assume Enterprise pricing at ~$150-200/user/month, which is common for custom enterprise tiers.

Additional constraints

Sales-driven pricing
Enterprise requires engaging GetAccept's sales team for custom quotes, extending procurement timelines.
Bundle lock-in
SCIM comes packaged with enterprise-grade features you may not need, but cannot be purchased separately.
No trial period
Unlike their 14-day free trial for standard plans, Enterprise features require contract commitment to test provisioning functionality.
Entity separation
Each GetAccept entity requires a separate Okta/Entra application, complicating multi-subsidiary deployments.

Summary of challenges

  • GetAccept supports SCIM but only at Enterprise tier (Custom)
  • Google Workspace users get JIT provisioning only, not full SCIM
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What the upgrade actually includes

GetAccept doesn't sell SCIM à la carte. It's bundled with Enterprise features that most sales teams don't need:

SCIM automated provisioning (user lifecycle management)
SAML 2.0 single sign-on (SSO)
Advanced team management and role-based access
Custom branding and white-labeling
Advanced analytics and reporting
Priority support and onboarding
API access and webhook integrations
Advanced compliance features

Stitchflow Insight

If you need enterprise-grade security controls anyway, the upgrade may make sense. If you just want automated user provisioning for your sales team, you're paying for a bundle you won't fully use. We estimate ~60% of Enterprise features are irrelevant for teams that only need SCIM to manage sales rep access to documents and deals.

What IT admins are saying

Community sentiment on GetAccept's Enterprise-only SCIM is mixed, with cost concerns overshadowing implementation satisfaction. Common complaints:

  • Enterprise pricing requirements that force expensive upgrades just for user provisioning
  • Lack of transparent pricing makes budget planning difficult
  • Having to pay for advanced features when you only need basic SCIM automation
  • Limited flexibility for mid-market teams that need provisioning but not full Enterprise features

We're a 50-person sales team and just need automated user provisioning. The jump to Enterprise feels excessive for what should be a basic security feature.

IT Director, SaaS Company

GetAccept's SCIM works well once you're on Enterprise, but getting there requires a custom quote conversation that takes weeks.

Systems Administrator, Tech Startup

The recurring theme

GetAccept gates essential identity automation behind Enterprise pricing, creating budget friction for teams that need SCIM but don't require the full Enterprise feature set.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
On Professional/Deal Room, need SCIMUse Stitchflow: avoid the Enterprise tier jump
Already on Enterprise planUse native SCIM: you're paying for it already
Need Enterprise features beyond SCIMEvaluate Enterprise: SCIM comes bundled with other features
Small sales team, low rep turnoverManual may work: but watch for document access gaps
Mixed IdP environment or complex provisioningUse Stitchflow: broader IdP support and managed automation

The bottom line

GetAccept gates SCIM behind Enterprise. The upgrade may unlock provisioning, but the workflow still has to complete across the rest of your stack.

Close the GetAccept workflow gap

GetAccept gates SCIM behind Enterprise, but the bigger issue is the workflow around it. Stitchflow builds and maintains the offboarding, access review, or license workflow underneath.

Across every app in the workflow, including the ones without APIs
Built in less than a week, with roughly 2 hours from your team
You review the exceptions. Stitchflow maintains the workflow underneath
Start with the free gap diagnostic

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

2.0

Supported Operations

Create, Update, Deactivate, Groups

Supported Attributes

Not specified

Plan requirement

Enterprise

Prerequisites

SSO must be configured first

Key limitations

  • Enterprise plan required
  • SCIM for user provisioning

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app with SCIM provisioning

Prerequisite

SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → GetAccept → Provisioning

Required credentials

SCIM endpoint URL and bearer token (generated in app admin console).

Configuration steps

Enable Create Users, Update User Attributes, and Deactivate Users.

Provisioning trigger

Okta provisions based on app assignments (users or groups).

SAML 2.0 SSO and SCIM provisioning. Each entity requires separate Okta app. Provisions users and teams. Supports user create, update, delete/inactivate, team management, role-based access. Name ID format must be EmailAddress.

GetAccept gates SCIM behind Enterprise. The upgrade may unlock provisioning, but the workflow still has to complete across the rest of your stack.

Configuration for Entra ID

Integration type

Microsoft Entra Gallery app with SCIM provisioning

Prerequisite

SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.

Where to enable

Entra admin center → Enterprise applications → GetAccept → Provisioning

Required credentials

Tenant URL (SCIM endpoint) and Secret token (bearer token from app admin console).

Configuration steps

Set Provisioning Mode = Automatic, configure SCIM connection.

Provisioning trigger

Entra provisions based on user/group assignments to the enterprise app.

Sync behavior

Entra provisioning runs on a scheduled cycle (typically every 40 minutes).

Azure AD SCIM provisioning supported. Creates users, updates attributes, deletes/inactivates users, creates teams from AD groups, manages group membership, supports custom application roles for access rights.

GetAccept gates SCIM behind Enterprise. The upgrade may unlock provisioning, but the workflow still has to complete across the rest of your stack.

Close the workflow gap in
GetAccept

GetAccept gates SCIM behind Enterprise plan. That can unlock provisioning, but it still does not complete the offboarding, access review, or license workflow across your stack.

Start with the free gap diagnostic
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
GetAccept logo
GetAccept
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

8x8 logo

8x8

SCIM Tax

UCaaS / Business Communications

SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

8x8 supports SCIM 2.0 for automated user provisioning, but only on their quote-based X Series plans (previously $24-44/user/month range before they moved to custom pricing). While SCIM can create, update, and deactivate users, it has critical gaps that create ongoing manual overhead: license assignment must be done manually after every user is provisioned, users can't be deleted (only deactivated), and provisioned users don't automatically appear in the Company Directory. For IT teams managing a unified communications platform that typically covers all employees, these limitations defeat much of SCIM's purpose. You're still manually touching every user account to assign licenses and ensure directory visibility. The lack of user deletion support also creates compliance headaches when employees leave - accounts accumulate as "deactivated" rather than being properly removed.

View full guide
Absorb LMS logo

Absorb LMS

SCIM Tax

Learning Management System (LMS)

SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Absorb LMS supports native SCIM provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans with SSO as a required paid add-on. Even with SCIM enabled, the implementation has critical limitations: SAML provisioning only creates accounts on first login and never updates existing users, and full user provisioning requires the specific "Absorb 5 - New Learner Experience" version. For organizations managing compliance training across hundreds or thousands of learners, these gaps create ongoing manual work. The SSO-as-add-on model means you're paying extra fees on top of already custom Enterprise pricing ($6-12/user/month base, but varies significantly). For learning management systems handling external partners, contractors, and employees across different access levels, the inability to update existing user attributes through SAML provisioning forces IT teams into manual account management—exactly what automated provisioning should eliminate.

View full guide
Airbase logo

Airbase

SCIM Tax

Spend Management / Corporate Cards

SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Airbase supports SCIM provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans starting around $8,500/year. While SCIM works with all major identity providers (Okta, Entra ID, Google Workspace), the Enterprise requirement creates a significant barrier for smaller finance teams who need automated provisioning for spend management but can't justify enterprise-level spend management software costs. This creates a particular challenge in finance applications where rapid provisioning and deprovisioning is critical for corporate card access and financial controls. Manual user management means delayed access for new employees needing corporate cards, and more critically, potential security gaps when departing employees retain access to spend management systems. For finance teams handling sensitive financial data and corporate spending, these delays and oversights create both operational friction and compliance risks.

View full guide