Stitchflow
Later logo

Later SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Later user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Later, the social media management platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Later offers enterprise SSO through SAML 2.0 and OIDC via their Keycloak identity broker, this only handles authentication for existing users. The system requires manual user creation before SSO can function—there's no JIT provisioning or automated user lifecycle management. Additionally, Later only supports SP-initiated SSO flows, meaning users must start their login journey from the Later application rather than their identity provider dashboard.

This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing marketing departments that rely on Later for social media scheduling and analytics. Without automated provisioning, administrators must manually create and maintain user accounts, defeating much of the purpose of centralized identity management. The lack of JIT provisioning means new team members can't simply be assigned the application in their IdP and gain immediate access—someone must first manually create their Later account. For organizations with frequent team changes or seasonal marketing staff, this manual overhead quickly becomes unmanageable.

The strategic alternative

Stitchflow provides SCIM-level provisioning through resilient browser automation for Later without requiring any custom development work. Works with any Later plan and any identity provider (Okta, Entra, Google Workspace, OneLogin). Flat pricing under $5K/year, regardless of team size.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0, OIDC
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaVia third-partyNo dedicated OIN integration. Enterprise SSO via generic SAML/OIDC. Setup requires Account Manager. No SCIM or JIT.
Microsoft Entra IDVia third-partyEnterprise SSO supported via generic SAML/OIDC. Uses Keycloak as identity broker. No SCIM provisioning.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Later accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Later pricing problem

Later gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Starter$25/month
Growth$45/month
Advanced$80/month
Scale$110/month
Agency$200+/month
EnterpriseCustom pricing

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Starter$25/month
Growth$45/month
Advanced$80/month
Scale$110/month
Agency$200+/month
EnterpriseCustom pricing

What this means in practice

Manual user lifecycle management: Every new hire, role change, or departure requires manual intervention in Later. IT cannot rely on IdP group memberships or automated provisioning workflows.

SP-initiated SSO only: Users must start their login process from Later's interface - they cannot click a tile in their IdP dashboard and automatically access Later.

Pre-provisioning requirement: Before enabling SSO for a user, someone must manually create their Later account. There's no just-in-time provisioning to streamline onboarding.

Additional constraints

Account Manager dependency
Enterprise SSO setup requires coordination with Later's Account Manager rather than self-service configuration
Keycloak intermediary
Later uses Keycloak as an identity broker, adding another layer between your IdP and the application
No IdP-initiated flows
Users cannot launch Later directly from their identity provider dashboard
External user complexity
Contractors or external collaborators need manual invitation processes since automated provisioning isn't available

Summary of challenges

  • Later does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Later actually offers for identity

Enterprise SSO (Custom pricing)

Later provides enterprise single sign-on capabilities, but with significant provisioning gaps:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0, OIDC
Identity brokerKeycloak (internal)
Supported IdPsAny SAML/OIDC provider via Keycloak
User requirementManual user creation before SSO login
Setup processRequires Account Manager involvement

Critical limitation: Later's SSO implementation offers zero automation. No SCIM provisioning, no Just-in-Time (JIT) user creation, and only SP-initiated authentication flows.

What's missing for enterprise teams

Later's identity approach creates operational overhead for IT teams:

No automated provisioning
Every user must be manually created in Later before they can authenticate
No JIT provisioning
Users can't be created automatically during first login
SP-initiated only
Users must start from Later's interface, can't launch from IdP dashboards
Manual deprovisioning
Removing access requires manual steps in Later's admin panel
External user friction
Agency clients and contractors need separate manual invitations

The real-world impact

For marketing teams managing social media at scale, Later's manual provisioning model means:

IT admins spend time on routine user management instead of strategic work
New team members experience delays getting access to critical social media tools
Offboarding employees requires remembering to manually remove Later access
Agency relationships require duplicate user management processes

This manual approach doesn't scale for growing marketing organizations that need seamless identity automation.

What IT admins are saying

Later's lack of automated provisioning creates significant administrative overhead for IT teams managing social media access:

  • Manual user creation required before SSO login can work
  • No automated deprovisioning when employees leave
  • Account Manager required for enterprise SSO setup adds deployment friction
  • SP-initiated only SSO limits user experience flexibility

User accounts must exist in Later before SSO authentication can work - there's no automatic account creation.

IT Administrator, Marketing Agency

We have to manually track who needs Later access and create accounts separately from our identity provider. It's another system to remember when onboarding.

Systems Administrator, Enterprise

When someone leaves, we have to remember to manually remove them from Later since there's no SCIM to handle it automatically.

IT Director, SaaS Company

The recurring theme

Even with enterprise SSO configured, Later requires manual user lifecycle management. IT teams must create accounts before users can authenticate and remember to manually remove access when employees leave, creating security and operational risks.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small marketing team (<10 users)Manual management is acceptable
Stable social media team with low turnoverManual management with SSO for authentication
Growing agency (25+ clients, frequent staff changes)Use Stitchflow: automation essential
Enterprise marketing org with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automation essential for audit trail
Multi-brand companies with complex team structuresUse Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended

The bottom line

Later is a solid social media management platform, but it lacks any automated provisioning capabilities—no SCIM, no JIT, just manual user creation even with enterprise SSO. For marketing organizations that need provisioning automation without the manual overhead of creating users before they can authenticate, Stitchflow is the simpler path.

Automate Later without third-party complexity

Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning through resilient browser automation, backed by 24/7 human in the loop for Later at <$5K/year, flat, regardless of team size.

Works alongside or instead of native SCIM
Syncs with your existing IdP (Okta, Entra ID, Google Workspace)
Automates onboarding and offboarding
SOC 2 Type II certified
24/7 human-in-the-loop monitoring
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No SCIM provisioningNo JIT provisioningSP-initiated SSO onlySetup requires Account ManagerMulti-IdP supported via Keycloak

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No SCIM provisioning
  • No JIT provisioning
  • SP-initiated SSO only
  • Setup requires Account Manager
  • Multi-IdP supported via Keycloak

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Later

Later doesn't offer SCIM. Get an enterprise-grade SCIM endpoint in your IdP, even without native support.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Later logo
Later
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Buffer logo

Buffer

No SCIM

Social Media Management

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Buffer, the social media management platform, does not offer SCIM provisioning or enterprise SSO capabilities on any plan. The platform is designed for small businesses and agencies, relying on OAuth social login integration rather than enterprise identity standards. With pricing structured around channels ($5-10 per channel per month) rather than users, Buffer lacks the foundational enterprise features that IT teams need for automated user lifecycle management. This creates significant operational gaps for larger organizations using Buffer. Without SCIM, IT teams must manually create, update, and deactivate user accounts across potentially dozens of social media channels and Buffer workspaces. When employees leave or change roles, there's no automated way to revoke access to sensitive social media accounts, creating compliance risks and potential brand security issues. The lack of centralized identity management means Buffer access often becomes "shadow IT" that security teams can't properly govern.

View full guide
Hootsuite logo

Hootsuite

SCIM Tax

Social Media Management

SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Hootsuite supports SCIM 2.0 for automated user provisioning, but only on Enterprise plans starting at $15,000/year minimum plus $1,800-2,000 per user. For a 50-person marketing team, that's $105,000+/year just to unlock basic provisioning automation. Making matters worse, Hootsuite requires their Customer Success Manager to configure SSO, and user accounts must be pre-created before SSO can be enabled—defeating much of the automation benefit. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing social media access. Without automated provisioning, you're stuck manually creating accounts for every new marketing hire, updating roles when people switch teams, and remembering to deactivate access when employees leave. For an app that's often used by contractors, agencies, and temporary campaign staff, this manual overhead quickly becomes unmanageable.

View full guide
Sprout Social logo

Sprout Social

SCIM Tax

Social Media Management

SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Sprout Social does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Enterprise customers get SAML 2.0 SSO with Just-In-Time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—it doesn't handle ongoing lifecycle management, role assignments, or deprovisioning when employees leave. At $199-$499+ per seat monthly (with Enterprise requiring custom pricing above the $499 Advanced tier), organizations are paying premium rates but still manually managing user accounts in Sprout Social's admin panel. This JIT-only approach creates significant operational gaps for IT teams managing social media access. When marketing team members join, change roles, or leave the company, their Sprout Social permissions must be manually updated or removed. There's no automated way to assign users to specific social media accounts, adjust publishing permissions, or ensure former employees lose access immediately upon termination. For organizations managing multiple social media managers across different brand accounts, this manual overhead becomes substantial, while deactivated employees retain access until manually removed—creating security risks for your organization's social media presence.

View full guide