Summary and recommendation
Later, the social media management platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Later offers enterprise SSO through SAML 2.0 and OIDC via their Keycloak identity broker, this only handles authentication for existing users. The system requires manual user creation before SSO can function—there's no JIT provisioning or automated user lifecycle management. Additionally, Later only supports SP-initiated SSO flows, meaning users must start their login journey from the Later application rather than their identity provider dashboard.
This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing marketing departments that rely on Later for social media scheduling and analytics. Without automated provisioning, administrators must manually create and maintain user accounts, defeating much of the purpose of centralized identity management. The lack of JIT provisioning means new team members can't simply be assigned the application in their IdP and gain immediate access—someone must first manually create their Later account. For organizations with frequent team changes or seasonal marketing staff, this manual overhead quickly becomes unmanageable.
The strategic alternative
Stitchflow provides SCIM-level provisioning through resilient browser automation for Later without requiring any custom development work. Works with any Later plan and any identity provider (Okta, Entra, Google Workspace, OneLogin). Flat pricing under $5K/year, regardless of team size.
Quick SCIM facts
| SCIM available? | No |
| SCIM tier required | N/A |
| SSO required first? | No |
| SSO available? | Yes |
| SSO protocol | SAML 2.0, OIDC |
| Documentation | Not available |
Supported identity providers
| IdP | SSO | SCIM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta | Via third-party | ❌ | No dedicated OIN integration. Enterprise SSO via generic SAML/OIDC. Setup requires Account Manager. No SCIM or JIT. |
| Microsoft Entra ID | Via third-party | ❌ | Enterprise SSO supported via generic SAML/OIDC. Uses Keycloak as identity broker. No SCIM provisioning. |
| Google Workspace | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
| OneLogin | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
The cost of not automating
Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Later accounts manually. Here's what that costs:
The Later pricing problem
Later gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.
Tier comparison
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $25/month | ||
| Growth | $45/month | ||
| Advanced | $80/month | ||
| Scale | $110/month | ||
| Agency | $200+/month | ||
| Enterprise | Custom pricing |
Pricing structure
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $25/month | ||
| Growth | $45/month | ||
| Advanced | $80/month | ||
| Scale | $110/month | ||
| Agency | $200+/month | ||
| Enterprise | Custom pricing |
What this means in practice
Manual user lifecycle management: Every new hire, role change, or departure requires manual intervention in Later. IT cannot rely on IdP group memberships or automated provisioning workflows.
SP-initiated SSO only: Users must start their login process from Later's interface - they cannot click a tile in their IdP dashboard and automatically access Later.
Pre-provisioning requirement: Before enabling SSO for a user, someone must manually create their Later account. There's no just-in-time provisioning to streamline onboarding.
Additional constraints
Summary of challenges
- Later does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
- Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
- Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually
What Later actually offers for identity
Enterprise SSO (Custom pricing)
Later provides enterprise single sign-on capabilities, but with significant provisioning gaps:
| Setting | Details |
|---|---|
| Protocol | SAML 2.0, OIDC |
| Identity broker | Keycloak (internal) |
| Supported IdPs | Any SAML/OIDC provider via Keycloak |
| User requirement | Manual user creation before SSO login |
| Setup process | Requires Account Manager involvement |
Critical limitation: Later's SSO implementation offers zero automation. No SCIM provisioning, no Just-in-Time (JIT) user creation, and only SP-initiated authentication flows.
What's missing for enterprise teams
Later's identity approach creates operational overhead for IT teams:
The real-world impact
For marketing teams managing social media at scale, Later's manual provisioning model means:
This manual approach doesn't scale for growing marketing organizations that need seamless identity automation.
What IT admins are saying
Later's lack of automated provisioning creates significant administrative overhead for IT teams managing social media access:
- Manual user creation required before SSO login can work
- No automated deprovisioning when employees leave
- Account Manager required for enterprise SSO setup adds deployment friction
- SP-initiated only SSO limits user experience flexibility
User accounts must exist in Later before SSO authentication can work - there's no automatic account creation.
We have to manually track who needs Later access and create accounts separately from our identity provider. It's another system to remember when onboarding.
When someone leaves, we have to remember to manually remove them from Later since there's no SCIM to handle it automatically.
The recurring theme
Even with enterprise SSO configured, Later requires manual user lifecycle management. IT teams must create accounts before users can authenticate and remember to manually remove access when employees leave, creating security and operational risks.
The decision
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Small marketing team (<10 users) | Manual management is acceptable |
| Stable social media team with low turnover | Manual management with SSO for authentication |
| Growing agency (25+ clients, frequent staff changes) | Use Stitchflow: automation essential |
| Enterprise marketing org with compliance requirements | Use Stitchflow: automation essential for audit trail |
| Multi-brand companies with complex team structures | Use Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended |
The bottom line
Later is a solid social media management platform, but it lacks any automated provisioning capabilities—no SCIM, no JIT, just manual user creation even with enterprise SSO. For marketing organizations that need provisioning automation without the manual overhead of creating users before they can authenticate, Stitchflow is the simpler path.
Automate Later without third-party complexity
Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning through resilient browser automation, backed by 24/7 human in the loop for Later at <$5K/year, flat, regardless of team size.
Technical specifications
SCIM Version
Not specifiedSupported Operations
Not specifiedSupported Attributes
Plan requirement
Not specifiedPrerequisites
Not specifiedKey limitations
- No SCIM provisioning
- No JIT provisioning
- SP-initiated SSO only
- Setup requires Account Manager
- Multi-IdP supported via Keycloak
Documentation not available.
Unlock SCIM for
Later
Later doesn't offer SCIM. Get an enterprise-grade SCIM endpoint in your IdP, even without native support.
See how it works


