Stitchflow
Marvel logo

Marvel SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Marvel user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Marvel, the design and prototyping platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Marvel offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration on their Enterprise tier through their Admin Console Security settings, this only handles authentication—not user lifecycle management. IT teams must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Marvel, even when SSO is configured. This creates a significant operational burden for organizations managing design teams across multiple projects and client workspaces.

The gap between authentication and provisioning becomes particularly problematic for design teams that frequently onboard contractors, rotate between projects, or manage access to sensitive client work. Without automated provisioning, IT admins face the tedious process of manually managing user accounts while trying to maintain security compliance. SSO alone doesn't solve the fundamental challenge of keeping Marvel user lists synchronized with your identity provider—expired contractors may retain access to confidential design assets, and new team members experience delays getting access to active projects.

The strategic alternative

Marvel has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?Yes
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaVia third-partyNo native Okta integration in OIN. SSO available via third-party miniOrange extension. Enterprise tier required for SSO features.
Microsoft Entra IDVia third-partyNo native Entra integration documented. SAML SSO available on Enterprise tier via Admin Console Security settings.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Marvel accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Marvel pricing problem

Marvel gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Free$0/month (1 user, 2 projects)
Pro$12/month ($16 monthly)
Team$42/month (3 users)
Company$84/month (6 users)
EnterpriseCustom pricing

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Free$0/month (1 user, 2 projects)
Pro$12/month ($16 monthly)
Team$42/month (3 users)
Company$84/month (6 users)
EnterpriseCustom pricing

What this means in practice

Without SCIM support, IT teams must manually provision and deprovision every designer, product manager, and UX researcher who needs Marvel access. This creates several operational challenges:

Manual account creation
Every new hire requires IT to manually create Marvel accounts
Delayed access
New team members can't access design projects until IT processes their request
Security gaps
Departing employees may retain access until manually removed
Scaling friction
Growing design teams mean exponentially more manual work

For a 50-person design organization, this translates to roughly 100+ manual provisioning actions per year (new hires, role changes, departures).

Additional constraints

Third-party SSO dependency
Marvel's SSO implementation relies on third-party providers like miniOrange rather than native integration
Enterprise tier requirement
SSO capabilities are locked behind custom Enterprise pricing, potentially increasing costs significantly from the $84/month Company plan
Limited automation options
No API-based provisioning alternatives documented for automated user lifecycle management
Role mapping complexity
Without SCIM attribute mapping, maintaining consistent access levels across team changes becomes manual work

Summary of challenges

  • Marvel does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Marvel actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Enterprise tier only)

Marvel provides basic SAML 2.0 single sign-on functionality on their Enterprise plan:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Entra ID, OneLogin, Google Workspace
ConfigurationAdmin Console Security tab
User requirementManual account creation required

Critical limitation: Marvel's SSO implementation provides authentication only. All user accounts must be manually created and managed within Marvel's interface before SSO login is possible.

No Provisioning Automation

Marvel has no documented SCIM support or automated provisioning capabilities:

FeatureSupported?
SCIM provisioning❌ No
Just-in-time (JIT) provisioning❌ No
Automated user creation❌ No
Automated deprovisioning❌ No
Group/team sync❌ No
License management❌ Manual only

The Enterprise Reality

Marvel's Enterprise tier includes features like unlimited users, advanced security, and SSO—but design teams typically need only the provisioning automation. The Enterprise package forces you to pay for project management features, advanced analytics, and enterprise support that most IT teams don't require for basic user lifecycle management.

Bottom line: You get authentication but still handle all user provisioning, deprovisioning, and license management manually through Marvel's admin interface.

What IT admins are saying

Marvel's lack of native SCIM support creates ongoing headaches for IT teams managing design tools:

  • Manual user provisioning required even with SSO configured
  • Enterprise tier pricing barrier just to get basic SSO functionality
  • Third-party SSO solutions add complexity and potential failure points
  • No automated deprovisioning when team members leave

Marvel has SAML SSO available on Enterprise... Configure via Admin Console Security tab

miniOrange integration documentation

SSO on Enterprise tier. No native SCIM documented. Third-party SSO integrations available.

Marvel pricing analysis

The recurring theme

Marvel treats user lifecycle management as an afterthought. Even teams paying for Enterprise must manually add and remove users, turning what should be automated provisioning into a recurring administrative task.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small design team (<10 users)Manual management is acceptable
Stable UX team with low turnoverManual management with SSO for authentication
Large product organization (25+ designers)Use Stitchflow: automation essential for scale
Enterprise with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automation essential for audit trail
Multi-team design ops across departmentsUse Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended

The bottom line

Marvel App is a solid design and prototyping platform, but it offers no SCIM provisioning capabilities whatsoever. Even with Enterprise-tier SSO, all user management must be handled manually. For design teams that want provisioning automation without the manual overhead, Stitchflow is the clear solution.

Make Marvel workflows AI-native

Marvel has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No native SCIM documentedSSO on Enterprise tierThird-party SSO setup (miniOrange, etc.)

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No native SCIM documented
  • SSO on Enterprise tier
  • Third-party SSO setup (miniOrange, etc.)

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Marvel

Marvel has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Marvel logo
Marvel
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

ProtoPie logo

ProtoPie

No SCIM

Design / Prototyping

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ProtoPie, the advanced prototyping platform for UX and product designers, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While their Enterprise tier ($2,000-$2,500 per license annually, minimum 3 licenses) includes SAML 2.0 SSO integration with Okta, OneLogin, and other identity providers, this only handles authentication—not user lifecycle management. Organizations must manually create, update, and deactivate user accounts within ProtoPie's interface, creating a provisioning gap that grows more problematic as design teams scale. This manual approach becomes a significant operational burden for IT teams managing multiple design tool subscriptions. With ProtoPie's high Enterprise tier pricing starting at $6,000-$7,500 minimum annually, organizations expect enterprise-grade automation capabilities. The lack of SCIM means IT admins must coordinate with design team leads every time someone joins, changes roles, or leaves the organization—a process that's both time-consuming and introduces security risks from delayed deprovisioning.

View full guide
6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
Aha! logo

Aha!

No SCIM

Product Management / Roadmapping

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Aha! Roadmaps, the product roadmapping platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Aha! offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta, Entra ID, and OneLogin, this only handles authentication through JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning. The critical limitation: JIT provisioning creates user accounts with no default role or access permissions, requiring administrators to manually configure access for each user after they first sign in. For product teams managing strategic roadmaps and stakeholder access, this creates significant operational overhead. Since product roadmaps contain sensitive strategic information and stakeholder access typically varies by product area, IT administrators must manually assign appropriate roles and workspace permissions after each user is provisioned. There's no automatic deprovisioning when users leave the organization, creating potential security gaps. This manual process becomes particularly problematic for larger product organizations where dozens of stakeholders across different business units need carefully managed access to specific roadmaps.

View full guide