Summary and recommendation
Qwilr, the proposal creation platform used by sales and marketing teams, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Qwilr offers OAuth-based SSO integration with Okta, Entra ID, Google Workspace, and OneLogin, this only handles authentication, not user lifecycle management. Users must be manually provisioned in Qwilr first, then mapped to SSO identities. The OAuth-only approach (no SAML) also limits integration options compared to enterprise-standard SAML implementations.
This creates a significant operational gap for IT teams managing growing sales organizations. OAuth SSO alone doesn't solve the core provisioning challenge—new sales hires still require manual account creation, role assignment, and access configuration in Qwilr. When team members leave or change roles, IT must remember to manually deprovision or update their Qwilr access, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure.
The strategic alternative
Qwilr has no native SCIM. That leaves a workflow gap in offboarding, access reviews, and license cleanup unless your team handles the app another way. Stitchflow builds and maintains the IT workflows your team still runs manually, across every app, including the ones without APIs.
Quick SCIM facts
| SCIM available? | No |
| SCIM tier required | N/A |
| SSO required first? | Yes |
| SSO available? | Yes |
| SSO protocol | OAuth |
| Documentation | Not available |
Supported identity providers
| IdP | SSO | SCIM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta | ✓ | ❌ | OAuth SSO supported. No Okta catalog app. No SCIM provisioning. |
| Microsoft Entra ID | ✓ | ❌ | OAuth SSO with Microsoft supported. No SCIM provisioning. |
| Google Workspace | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
| OneLogin | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
The cost of not automating
Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Qwilr accounts manually. Here's what that costs:
The Qwilr pricing problem
Qwilr gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.
Tier comparison
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business | $35/user/month (annual) | ||
| Enterprise | $59/user/month (annual) |
Pricing structure
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business | $35/user/month (annual) | ||
| Enterprise | $59/user/month (annual) |
What this means in practice
No automated user provisioning: Without SCIM, every user addition, role change, and deactivation requires manual intervention. IT admins must:
OAuth-only SSO limitations: While Qwilr supports OAuth SSO with major IdPs, the lack of SAML means:
Additional constraints
Summary of challenges
- Qwilr does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
- Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
- Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually
What Qwilr actually offers for identity
OAuth SSO (Business plan and above)
Qwilr supports OAuth-based single sign-on with major identity providers:
| Setting | Details |
|---|---|
| Protocol | OAuth 2.0 (not enterprise SAML) |
| Supported IdPs | Google, Microsoft, Okta, OneLogin |
| Configuration | OAuth app setup in your IdP |
| User requirement | Email addresses must match between IdP and Qwilr |
| Backup access | Admin email login available as fallback |
Critical limitation: OAuth SSO provides authentication but zero provisioning capabilities. Every user must be manually added to Qwilr before they can authenticate via SSO.
No SCIM or automated provisioning
Qwilr has no documented SCIM support or automated user management:
| Feature | Supported? |
|---|---|
| SCIM provisioning | ❌ No |
| Just-in-time (JIT) provisioning | ❌ No |
| SAML SSO | ❌ No |
| Automated user creation | ❌ No |
| Automated user updates | ❌ No |
| Automated deprovisioning | ❌ No |
| Group/role sync | ❌ No |
Real-world impact: IT teams manage Qwilr users through a completely manual process. When someone joins the sales team, leaves the company, or changes roles, administrators must log into Qwilr separately to create, update, or remove their account.
Enterprise plan extras (mostly irrelevant for provisioning)
The $59/user/month Enterprise plan includes:
Bottom line: 100% of Enterprise plan features are unrelated to identity management. You're paying 68% more per user primarily for longer data retention and account support.
What IT admins are saying
Qwilr's OAuth-only authentication creates headaches for enterprise IT teams managing user access:
- No SAML support - Limited to OAuth connections, blocking many enterprise SSO workflows
- Manual provisioning required - No SCIM means every user addition, removal, or role change requires manual work
- Email matching complications - User emails must exactly match between IdP and Qwilr for OAuth to work
- Enterprise minimum commitment - 5-user minimum on Enterprise plan forces unnecessary spend for smaller teams
The lack of SAML is a real problem for us. OAuth doesn't fit our security policies and we can't automate user lifecycle management.
We have to manually create every Qwilr account and remember to deactivate them when people leave. It's 2024 - this should be automated.
The recurring theme
Qwilr's consumer-grade authentication approach forces IT teams into manual user management workflows that don't scale with business growth or meet enterprise security requirements.
The decision
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Small sales team (<10 users) with low turnover | Manual management is acceptable |
| Simple setup with OAuth SSO needs only | Use Qwilr's native OAuth integration |
| Growing sales organization (20+ users) | Use Stitchflow: automation essential |
| Enterprise requiring SAML compliance | Use Stitchflow: OAuth-only won't meet requirements |
| Multi-department proposal workflows | Use Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended |
The bottom line
Qwilr has no native SCIM. That means one more workflow gap in offboarding, access reviews, and license cleanup unless your team handles it another way.
Close the Qwilr workflow gap
Qwilr is one gap in a broader workflow. Stitchflow builds and maintains the offboarding, access review, or license workflow across every app in your environment.
Technical specifications
SCIM Version
Not specifiedSupported Operations
Not specifiedSupported Attributes
Plan requirement
Not specifiedPrerequisites
Not specifiedKey limitations
- OAuth SSO only, not SAML
- No SCIM documented
- Email must match between IdP and Qwilr
- Enterprise has 5-user minimum
Documentation not available.
Close the workflow gap in
Qwilr
Qwilr has no native SCIM. That leaves one more workflow gap in offboarding, access reviews, and license cleanup unless your team handles it another way.
Start with the free gap diagnostic


