Summary and recommendation
Taskade supports SCIM 2.0 for automated user provisioning, but only on their Enterprise plan with custom pricing. While SSO is available starting on the Teams plan ($100/month for unlimited users), SCIM requires the Enterprise tier - creating a significant pricing gap for organizations that need automated provisioning but don't require Enterprise features like private cloud deployment.
This creates a common dilemma for IT teams: pay for Enterprise-level features you don't need just to get basic provisioning automation, or manually manage user lifecycle in Taskade while relying on SSO alone. Without SCIM, you'll need to manually create accounts, update user attributes, and remove access when employees leave - exactly the kind of repetitive, error-prone work that automated provisioning is designed to eliminate.
The strategic alternative
Taskade gates SCIM behind Enterprise. That can unlock provisioning, but it still does not complete the offboarding, access review, or license workflow across the rest of your stack. Stitchflow builds and maintains the IT workflows your team still runs manually, across every app, including the ones without APIs.
Quick SCIM facts
| SCIM available? | Yes |
| SCIM tier required | Enterprise |
| SSO required first? | Yes |
| SSO available? | Yes |
| SSO protocol | SAML 2.0 / OIDC |
| Documentation | Official docs |
Supported identity providers
| IdP | SSO | SCIM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta | ✓ | ✓ | OIN app with full provisioning |
| Microsoft Entra ID | ✓ | ✓ | Gallery app with SCIM |
| Google Workspace | ✓ | JIT only | SAML SSO with just-in-time provisioning |
| OneLogin | ✓ | ✓ | Supported |
The cost of not automating
Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Taskade accounts manually. Here's what that costs:
The Taskade pricing problem
Taskade gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.
Plan Structure
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro | $8/user/mo annual | ||
| Business | $16/user/mo | ||
| Teams | $100/mo (unlimited members) | ||
| Enterprise | Custom pricing |
Note: Teams plan provides unlimited members with SSO but no SCIM. Enterprise requires custom sales engagement for SCIM 2.0 access.
What this means in practice
The jump from Teams ($100/mo flat) to Enterprise creates uncertainty around provisioning costs:
Teams to Enterprise upgrade considerations
Pricing opacity challenges
Additional constraints
Summary of challenges
- Taskade supports SCIM but only at Enterprise tier (Custom (SSO, SCIM, compliance, private cloud))
- Google Workspace users get JIT provisioning only, not full SCIM
- Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually
What the upgrade actually includes
Taskade doesn't sell SCIM à la carte. It's bundled with Enterprise features:
Stitchflow Insight
The jump from Teams ($100/mo flat) to Enterprise (custom pricing) is significant. Teams already includes SAML SSO, so you're essentially paying the Enterprise premium just to add SCIM provisioning. We estimate ~60% of Enterprise features are irrelevant for teams that only need automated user sync beyond what Teams offers.
What IT admins are saying
Community sentiment on Taskade's SCIM implementation is mixed, with most concerns centered on the Enterprise tier requirement and pricing transparency. Common complaints:
- SCIM being locked behind the Enterprise tier with custom pricing
- Lack of transparent Enterprise pricing makes budgeting difficult
- The jump from Teams ($100/mo flat) to Enterprise (custom) creates uncertainty
- Having to contact sales just to understand SCIM costs
The recurring theme
While Taskade offers solid SCIM functionality, the opaque Enterprise pricing model forces IT teams into sales conversations when they just want straightforward provisioning costs.
The decision
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| On Pro or Business plans, need SCIM | Use Stitchflow: avoid the costly Enterprise upgrade |
| Small team using Teams plan ($100/mo flat) | Consider native SCIM: Enterprise may be cost-effective |
| Need SCIM but not other Enterprise features | Use Stitchflow: get provisioning without custom pricing negotiations |
| Already committed to Enterprise plan | Use native SCIM: you're paying for it anyway |
| Minimal user changes, comfortable with manual work | Manual provisioning: but watch for security gaps as you scale |
The bottom line
Taskade gates SCIM behind Enterprise. The upgrade may unlock provisioning, but the workflow still has to complete across the rest of your stack.
Close the Taskade workflow gap
Taskade gates SCIM behind Enterprise, but the bigger issue is the workflow around it. Stitchflow builds and maintains the offboarding, access review, or license workflow underneath.
Technical specifications
SCIM Version
2.0
Supported Operations
Create, Update, Deactivate, Groups
Supported Attributes
Not specifiedPlan requirement
Enterprise
Prerequisites
SSO must be configured first
Key limitations
- SCIM requires Enterprise plan
- SSO available on Teams plan
Configuration for Entra ID
Integration type
Microsoft Entra Gallery app with SCIM provisioning
Prerequisite
SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.
Where to enable
Required credentials
Tenant URL (SCIM endpoint) and Secret token (bearer token from app admin console).
Configuration steps
Set Provisioning Mode = Automatic, configure SCIM connection.
Provisioning trigger
Entra provisions based on user/group assignments to the enterprise app.
Sync behavior
Entra provisioning runs on a scheduled cycle (typically every 40 minutes).
Enterprise required for SCIM
Taskade gates SCIM behind Enterprise. The upgrade may unlock provisioning, but the workflow still has to complete across the rest of your stack.
Close the workflow gap in
Taskade
Taskade gates SCIM behind Enterprise plan. That can unlock provisioning, but it still does not complete the offboarding, access review, or license workflow across your stack.
Start with the free gap diagnostic


