Stitchflow
Terraform Cloud logo

Terraform Cloud SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Terraform Cloud user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Terraform Cloud does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan, including Enterprise. While HashiCorp provides robust SAML 2.0 and OIDC SSO integration with team membership sync via SAML assertions, this only handles authentication and group assignments—not user lifecycle management. User accounts must still be manually created in Terraform Cloud before team members can access workspaces, even with SSO enabled.

This creates a significant operational gap for DevOps teams managing infrastructure-as-code at scale. Without automated provisioning, IT administrators must manually onboard developers and platform engineers into Terraform Cloud workspaces, then remember to deprovision access when team members leave or change roles. Given Terraform Cloud's role in managing critical infrastructure resources, this manual process introduces both security risks and compliance challenges that scale poorly with team growth.

The strategic alternative

Stitchflow provides SCIM-level provisioning through resilient browser automation for Terraform Cloud without requiring any custom development work. Works with any Terraform Cloud plan and integrates with Okta, Entra, Google Workspace, and OneLogin. Flat pricing under $5K/year, regardless of team size.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0 / OIDC
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaSSO with SAML 2.0 and team sync via SAML assertions. JIT provisioning. No SCIM provisioning.
Microsoft Entra IDSSO supported via SAML 2.0. No native SCIM provisioning in Entra gallery.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Terraform Cloud accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Terraform Cloud pricing problem

Terraform Cloud gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Free$0 (up to 500 resources)
Standard~$1/month per 1000 resources
PlusContact sales
EnterpriseFrom $15,000/year (self-hosted)

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSCIM
Free$0 (up to 500 resources)
Standard~$1/month per 1000 resources
PlusContact sales
EnterpriseFrom $15,000/year (self-hosted)

Note: Terraform Cloud moved to resource-based pricing (RUM) in 2023. The free tier ends March 31, 2026.

What this means in practice

Manual account creation for all plans: Even with SSO configured, IT teams must manually create user accounts in Terraform Cloud before employees can authenticate. This applies to all pricing tiers, including Enterprise.

SAML team sync limitations: While team membership can sync via SAML assertions, this doesn't eliminate the initial manual provisioning step. Users still need accounts created before they can be assigned to teams.

Resource-based billing complexity: The shift to resource-based pricing means costs can scale unpredictably with infrastructure growth, but provisioning remains manual regardless of spend level.

Additional constraints

No automated deprovisioning
Removing users requires manual intervention in Terraform Cloud even when disabled in your IdP
JIT provisioning gaps
While JIT can create accounts on first login, it doesn't handle pre-provisioning for team assignments
Enterprise-only SSO
SAML/OIDC SSO requires Plus or Enterprise plans, though this doesn't solve the provisioning gap
Self-hosted complexity
Enterprise deployments require self-hosting, adding infrastructure management overhead

Summary of challenges

  • Terraform Cloud does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Terraform Cloud actually offers for identity

SAML/OIDC SSO (all paid plans)

Terraform Cloud provides federated authentication with team synchronization:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0 or OIDC
Supported IdPsOkta, Azure AD, ADFS, generic SAML/OIDC
Team syncVia SAML assertions
JIT provisioningSupported
User requirementAccounts must exist before first login

Critical limitation: While JIT provisioning creates accounts on first login, there's no automated way to pre-provision users or handle deprovisioning when employees leave.

Okta Integration (via OIN)

The official Okta Integration Network listing for Terraform Cloud shows:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes
OIDC SSO✓ Yes
Create users❌ No
Update users❌ No
Deactivate users❌ No
Group push✓ Via SAML assertions only

Microsoft Entra Integration

Similar story with Azure AD - SSO works, but no native provisioning capabilities:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes
Automatic provisioning❌ No
User lifecycle management❌ No

The problem: DevOps teams need automated user lifecycle management as engineers join projects, change teams, or leave the company. Terraform Cloud's current identity features require manual intervention for every user addition, modification, or removal - creating security gaps and administrative overhead for platform teams managing infrastructure access.

What IT admins are saying

Terraform Cloud's lack of SCIM provisioning creates manual overhead for DevOps teams managing infrastructure access:

The infrastructure-as-code space attracts security-conscious organizations, yet Terraform Cloud forces IT teams into manual account management workflows that create compliance gaps.

  • Manual user account creation required despite SSO being configured
  • Team membership syncing relies on SAML assertions, not proper provisioning
  • No automated deprovisioning when engineers leave the organization
  • SSO authentication works, but accounts must exist first

SSO doesn't auto-provision user accounts... Uses SAML assertions for team sync

Based on HashiCorp's SSO documentation

The recurring theme

Even with enterprise-grade SSO configured, every DevOps engineer and platform team member must be manually onboarded to Terraform Cloud. When team members leave, their Terraform access lingers unless IT remembers to clean it up separately.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small DevOps team (<10 engineers)Manual management is workable with SSO
Growing platform engineering org (10-50 users)Use Stitchflow: manual provisioning doesn't scale
Enterprise with multiple Terraform workspacesUse Stitchflow: automation essential for governance
High developer turnover or contractor usageUse Stitchflow: manual onboarding creates bottlenecks
Multi-cloud infrastructure with compliance needsUse Stitchflow: automated provisioning provides audit trail

The bottom line

Terraform Cloud offers excellent SSO with team sync via SAML assertions, but completely lacks SCIM provisioning—every user account must be created manually. For infrastructure teams managing critical deployments at scale, Stitchflow eliminates the manual bottleneck while maintaining the security and governance you need.

Automate Terraform Cloud without third-party complexity

Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning through resilient browser automation, backed by 24/7 human in the loop for Terraform Cloud at <$5K/year, flat, regardless of team size.

Works alongside or instead of native SCIM
Syncs with your existing IdP (Okta, Entra ID, Google Workspace)
Automates onboarding and offboarding
SOC 2 Type II certified
24/7 human-in-the-loop monitoring
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No native SCIM provisioningSSO doesn't auto-provision user accountsUses SAML assertions for team sync

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No native SCIM provisioning
  • SSO doesn't auto-provision user accounts
  • Uses SAML assertions for team sync

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Terraform Cloud → Sign On

SSO with SAML 2.0 and team sync via SAML assertions. JIT provisioning. No SCIM provisioning.

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Configuration for Entra ID

Integration type

Microsoft Entra Gallery app

Where to enable

Entra admin center → Enterprise applications → Terraform Cloud → Single sign-on

SSO supported via SAML 2.0. No native SCIM provisioning in Entra gallery.

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
Terraform Cloud

Terraform Cloud doesn't offer SCIM. Get an enterprise-grade SCIM endpoint in your IdP, even without native support.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Terraform Cloud logo
Terraform Cloud
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide