8 Best Zylo Alternatives for SaaS Management in 2025

Zylo was one of the first platforms to bring order to chaotic SaaS spending. With strong adoption among finance and procurement teams, it became the “SaaS visibility tool” of record—helping companies understand what they’re buying, who owns those contracts, and when renewals hit.

But in 2025, visibility is no longer enough.

Finance, knowing “we spend $50K on design tools,” does not prevent:

• A contractor retaining admin access to Figma after the rebrand project
• A marketer using an unvetted AI tool that no one else knows exists
• A former developer still being active in GitHub with production permissions
• Thousands of dollars in unused licenses that never get reclaimed
• SOC 2 audits are dragging on for weeks because no one knows who has access to what

These aren’t visibility problems. They’re automation problems.

The limits of visibility (and the rise of the automation gap)

A typical mid-market company now uses 200–300 SaaS apps, many purchased without IT involvement, many without SCIM or API-based automation. Offboarding is inconsistent. AI tools appear overnight. Apps that support SCIM hide it behind enterprise plans.

This creates a permanent identity governance gap, and Zylo can’t close it because Zylo only reports it.

Modern IT teams need platforms that don’t just show the problem. They need systems that actually fix it.

SCIM Tax: The silent cost behind your offboarding gaps

Here’s the part no vendor tells you:

• SCIM (provisioning automation) is intentionally locked behind enterprise plans.
• Vendors know that without SCIM, IT must manually log into browser UIs.
• As teams grow, this manual work creates:
  • orphaned accounts
  • unused licenses
  • hidden admin access
  • audit failures

This pressure forces companies to eventually upgrade, not for new features, but just for automation.

This is SCIM tax: pay more to avoid security and compliance risk that shouldn’t exist in the first place.

And this is where the best Zylo alternatives differ: Not in dashboards, but in how they handle automation, identity, and non-SCIM apps.

What to look for in a modern Zylo alternative

Most Zylo alternatives fall into two buckets:

• Visibility-led (Zluri, Nudge Security, Productiv)
• Automation-led (Stitchflow, Torii, BetterCloud, Lumos)

For 2025, visibility alone is table stakes. The real differentiation comes from execution.

The must-haves in a Zylo alternative today

1. End-to-end offboarding (including non-SCIM apps)

If a tool only works with SCIM-enabled apps, it solves 60% of your problem. Disconnected apps create your worst security gaps.

2. Real-time license reclamation

Quarterly usage reports don’t prevent accidental renewals.You need ongoing identity + usage reconciliation.

3. Event-driven access reviews

When HR updates a role, access should update—not three months later.

4. Multi-IDP and multi-domain support

Modern orgs run:

• Okta + Google
• Entra + Okta
• Multiple domains post-acquisition
• Contractors with Gmail accounts

5. Coverage for AI tools, internal tools, and long-tail apps

The fastest-growing part of your stack is the least integrated.

6. Root-cause remediation

Spotting a gap is easy. Fixing it, automatically, reliably, and securely, is what separates platforms.

8 Zylo alternatives at a glance

Here are 8 best Zylo alternatives at one glance

8 best Zylo alternatives in 2025

Here are the eight best Zylo alternatives that go beyond Zylo's spend visibility to actually solve your SaaS management headaches.

1. Stitchflow

Best for: IT, Security, and Compliance teams needing full SaaS governance, including non-SCIM apps and shadow AI tools

G2 Rating: 4.8 [See reviews]

The only Zylo alternative that fixes the gaps, not just reports them

Zylo tells you what you’re spending. Stitchflow tells you who still has access—and then fixes it.

Stitchflow unlocks SCIM-like automation for any app through resilient browser automation, eliminating the “SCIM tax” that forces mid-market companies into expensive enterprise tiers just to get provisioning.

If your offboarding reality looks like browser tabs, CSV uploads, bookmarked admin pages, and “Hey, can you remove this user?” Slack messages, Stitchflow replaces all of it with automation that your IdP can actually trust.

Why Stitchflow has two layers: the Automation Engine and the Platform

Most customers meet Stitchflow when they hit the same wall:“We just need SCIM for 5–10 apps that don’t have it unless we buy enterprise plans.”

Layer 1: The Automation Engine (SCIM for Non-SCIM Apps)

This is Stitchflow’s core innovation.

• A secure, headless browser logs into any app
• Executes deterministic admin actions (add user, remove user, change roles)
• Every run is monitored by a 24×7 engineering team that handles UI changes, MFA, and re-authentication
• IT triggers provisioning from Okta/Entra/Google exactly as if SCIM existed

Teams start here because it solves the immediate, painful problem:Manual deprovisioning in apps that vendors intentionally keep non-automatable.

But very quickly, a second problem appears:

Layer 2: The Stitchflow Platform (The Control Plane)

Once you automate a few apps, IT ends up with the question:

“Where do we see all this? Who owns what? What access can we safely remove?”

That’s why the Platform exists as a separate, optional layer.

It gives you:

• Shadow IT & AI discovery
• A unified app + user directory across IdPs, APIs, and non-SCIM apps
• License usage + identity context in one place
• Automated gap remediation using both APIs and the Automation Engine
• Real-time answers to: “Who has access to what, and why?”

In short:

• The Automation Engine replaces manual browser admin.
• The Platform replaces spreadsheets, audits, and chaos.

You can start with one app → expand to 5 → graduate into the Platform when you need full SaaS governance.

No lock-ins. No platform minimums. No enterprise pricing games.

Why Stitchflow is a better Zylo alternative

Zylo gives finance visibility. Stitchflow gives IT control.

Most Zylo customers still struggle with:

• Offboarding gaps in non-SCIM apps
• Orphaned accounts left behind by contractors
• Shadow AI tools IT never approved
• License waste discovered only during renewals
• Spreadsheets for quarterly access reviews

Stitchflow fixes the root cause by automating actions inside the apps themselves—not just reporting that something looks off.

Stitchflow improves where Zylo stops:

Automates offboarding

Across SCIM, non-SCIM, browser-only, CSV-only, or legacy apps.

Avoids the SCIM/SSO tax

You get SCIM-level automation without needing enterprise plans.

Cleans up identity drift

If someone changes roles or leaves, Stitchflow removes or adjusts access—even in apps your IdP can’t see.

Eliminates license waste

Real-time identity-level reconciliation prevents renewals from ballooning.

Always-on access reviews

Continuous checks, no spreadsheets, no Q4 panic.

Unified view for IT, Security, and Finance

One place to see apps, users, entitlements, owners, licenses, and gaps.

Case study: Turing cleaned up 2,658 orphaned accounts

Turing, an AI consulting firm serving 1,000+ enterprise customers, relied heavily on non-SCIM apps for contractor workflows. Offboarding was completely manual.

After deploying Stitchflow:

• 2,658 orphaned accounts were found across disconnected apps
• $106,000+ in annual waste was identified
• Offboarding became instant and hands-free
• No more browser tab babysitting

“Okta gave us structure, but Stitchflow completed our identity governance. We no longer worry about contractors lingering in our tools.”
— Edwin Katabaro, Head of IT & Security, Turing

Core Stitchflow capabilities

1. Resilient Browser Automation (RBA)

The breakthrough engine that gives you SCIM-like automation for any app:

• Secure, isolated headless browser
• Deterministic flows built + maintained by Stitchflow
• 24×7 engineering supervision for UI changes and MFA
• Full audit logs + video playback of every automation run

2. Identity-aware license cleanup

Real-time matching of:

• Who a user is (HR + IdP)
• What they have access to (API + non-SCIM)
• Whether they’re actually using it

Orphaned, misaligned, and unused access gets removed automatically.

3. Complete offboarding automation

Works even for:

• Apps with expensive SCIM plans (Figma, Zoom, Slack, Adobe)
• Internal admin tools
• Legacy SaaS
• New AI apps with no APIs

If it runs in a browser, Stitchflow can automate it.

4. Unified SaaS governance platform

Optional but powerful:

• Shadow IT & AI detection
• Unified user directory
• License and contract management
• Continuous access reviews
• Automated gap remediation across 100% of apps

How Stitchflow compares to Zylo

2. Torii

Best for: Ops and IT teams scaling lifecycle automation across the SaaS stack
G2 Rating: 4.5/5

Ever wish you could just tell your systems, "When someone joins Sales, give them Salesforce and HubSpot access automatically"? That's exactly what Torii does.

Torii is ideal for organizations ready to move from ad-hoc provisioning to structured, automated SaaS lifecycle management. While tools like Zylo surface contract details, Torii focuses on execution, automating workflows across onboarding, offboarding, and license reassignments.

Its low-code automation builder lets IT teams map access changes to real-world events. For example, if an employee switches departments or exits the company, Torii can immediately revoke or reassign licenses without waiting for a ticket.

Key capabilities of Torii

• Workflow automation engine: Drag-and-drop builder to customize onboarding, offboarding, and role change logic
• License policy enforcement: Set limits by department or role to prevent over-assignment
• Integrations with HRIS and ITSM tools: Works with Workday, BambooHR, Jira, ServiceNow, and more
• Browser-based app discovery: Captures shadow IT via browser agents and SSO
• Renewal insights: Combining spend data with app usage for smarter renewals

Pros of Torii

• Works well in environments where HR and IT systems are tightly coupled
• Automatically triggers workflows when HR data changes (e.g., role changes, exits)
• Reduces manual intervention during offboarding
• Scales effectively in mid- to large-sized companies with high SaaS complexity
• Especially useful where IT headcount is limited but automation needs are high

Cons of Torii

• Heavy focus on people and process automation; less emphasis on vendor or contract visibility
• Best suited if your main challenge is execution and workflow automation, not broader governance or financial optimization

3. Zluri

Best for: Mid-sized IT teams just beginning formal SaaS management
G2 Rating: 4.6/5

Zluri is a good starting point for companies looking to go beyond spreadsheets. It provides automated discovery of SaaS apps, license usage reports, and basic workflow automation. Compared to Zylo, which is often chosen by procurement teams, Zluri is more IT-centric.

It connects to SSO providers, finance systems, and device agents to pull app usage data, then surfaces insights such as underutilized licenses or apps purchased without approval.

Key capabilities of Zluri

• SaaS discovery via finance, SSO, and endpoint data
• License usage dashboards
• Renewal tracking and alerts
• Onboarding/offboarding workflows
• Role-based access controls and user management

Pros of Zluri

• Great fit for teams just beginning their SaaS management journey
• Especially useful for organizations with fewer than 1,000 employees
• Easy to adopt with a clean, approachable interface
• Provides IT-focused visibility at the user level (e.g., license utilization in Figma)
• Doesn’t require deep IT automation to get started

Cons of Zluri

• More suited for lightweight SaaS management; not built for complex compliance automation
• Works best for organizations that want visibility and user-level control, but may not scale as effectively for advanced governance needs

4. BetterCloud

Best for: Security-focused teams managing SaaS policy enforcement
G2 Rating: 4.4/5

BetterCloud is all about precision. It’s designed for security-conscious IT teams that need to enforce granular SaaS policies across collaboration suites, such as Google Workspace and Microsoft 365.

It uses event-based triggers and custom scripting to monitor behaviors and enforce controls. For example, if a file is shared externally from Google Drive, BetterCloud can revoke access and notify IT in real time.

Key capabilities of BetterCloud

• Event-driven scripting engine for policy enforcement
• Activity monitoring across core SaaS apps
• SaaS access remediation workflows
• Custom security alerts and audits
• Deep integrations with M365, Google, Slack, Dropbox, and more

Pros of BetterCloud

• Strong focus on what happens after SaaS apps are connected (policy enforcement, automation, control)
• Well-suited for large organizations with mature security postures
• Ideal for industries like healthcare or finance, where data leaks carry severe consequences
• Provides real-time control over risky user activity (e.g., file shares, permissions)
• Shifts the focus from visibility to active prevention of security risks

Cons of BetterCloud

• Assumes you already know your SaaS inventory; less focused on discovery
• Heavier implementation and management effort compared to lightweight platforms
• Best value comes in security-heavy environments, less so in smaller or less regulated companies

5. Productiv

Best for: CIOs, CFOs, and procurement teams driving consolidation and ROI
G2 Rating: 4.6/5

Productiv doesn’t focus on access or provisioning. Its niche is software ROI—analyzing how teams engage with applications to inform budget and consolidation decisions.

Instead of just reporting login activity, Productiv analyzes deeper usage metrics—like which features are being used, how often, and by which departments.

Key capabilities of Productiv

• Feature-level app engagement analytics
• Redundancy and consolidation recommendations
• Usage-based renewal forecasting
• Team-level benchmarks and reports
• C-suite dashboards

Pros of Productiv

• Designed for executive leadership seeking to rationalize SaaS spend across hundreds of tools
• Strong analytics for aligning software usage with business outcomes
• Helps measure productivity and ROI at the team level (e.g., Engineering, Marketing)
• Complements IT tools with a finance/strategy lens on SaaS value

Cons of Productiv

• Focused primarily on analytics and business outcomes, not access control or remediation
• May require significant data integration for full value
• Works best at scale; smaller orgs may find it more than they need

6. Nudge Security

Best for: Security teams managing decentralized SaaS environments
G2 Rating: 4.7/5

Nudge Security approaches SaaS risk from a behavioral angle. It identifies unsanctioned app usage (shadow IT) and, instead of blocking it outright, encourages employees to adopt secure practices.

This light-touch approach works well in companies where employees have the freedom to adopt tools, but security still needs guardrails.

Key capabilities of Nudge Security

• Shadow IT detection via browser and email telemetry
• Behavioral nudges and security prompts
• Tracking of unmanaged apps and accounts
• Non-intrusive deployment
• Team-level risk reporting

Pros of Nudge Security

• Ideal for remote-first companies where innovation outpaces IT approvals
• Excellent for startups and scale-ups that prioritize flexibility while maintaining security
• Especially valuable in developer-heavy environments, experimenting with new tools
• Proactively discovers unsanctioned apps and accounts (“shadow IT”)
• Helps surface security risks before they escalate

Cons of Nudge Security

• More focused on discovery and visibility, less on full lifecycle governance
• Best suited for fast-growing or experimental environments; less critical for highly controlled IT ecosystems
• May surface a large volume of shadow IT that still requires manual or external remediation

7. AccessOwl

Best for: Startups and scaling teams, automating access requests
G2 Rating: 4.7/5

Tired of your #it-help channel being flooded with "Hey, can someone add me to Figma?" messages? AccessOwl transforms those random requests into structured, automated workflows that actually get things done.

AccessOwl is all about access provisioning, making it easy for employees to request app access (typically via Slack or Teams), and for IT to enforce approval chains and track compliance.

It’s perfect for organizations where tickets pile up so that someone can gain access to Figma or Notion.

Key capabilities of AccessOwl

• Slack/Teams-based access request interface
• Pre-configured approval paths
• Auto-provisioning based on role or department
• Auto-deprovisioning on project close or role change
• Audit trail and reporting

Pros of AccessOwl

• Brings structure to access workflows without slowing teams down
• Especially valuable for agencies, consultancies, and startups with high turnover or project-based work
• Makes it easy to grant temporary access to client-specific tools
• Real-time, user-initiated provisioning streamlines requests and approvals
• Reduces manual IT workload by automating access control

Cons of AccessOwl

• Primarily focused on provisioning; not a full lifecycle SaaS management solution
• Best suited for fast-moving teams rather than heavily regulated enterprises
• May require additional tooling to handle compliance or broader governance

8. Lumos

Best for: Enterprises with formal compliance needs and audit workflows
G2 Rating: 4.7/5

Lumos is built for access governance at scale. It centralizes entitlements, manages access reviews, and helps enforce least-privilege policies, all in one system designed for audit-readiness.

If your organization needs to comply with SOX, SOC 2, or ISO 27001, Lumos can schedule reviews, collect evidence, and enforce policies across apps.

Key capabilities of Lumos

• Scheduled and event-triggered access reviews
• Entitlement catalog and policy enforcement
• Self-service access requests with approval flows
• Integration with HRIS, SSO, and ITSM tools
• Real-time risk insights for every app-user pair

Pros of Lumos

• Automates quarterly reviews and audit reconciliations, replacing spreadsheets
• Centralized workflows strengthen Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) practices
• Particularly effective for enterprises in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, public companies)
• Provides automated, evidence-backed role-based access reviews
• Ensures every user with access is authorized correctly and reviewed

Cons of Lumos

• More compliance- and audit-oriented, less focused on broader SaaS optimization
• It may be overkill for smaller organizations with lighter compliance requirements
• Implementation may require strong alignment with existing security teams and processes

Choosing the Right Zylo Alternative

Zylo introduced the world to SaaS spend visibility. But the world changed.

Today’s challenges aren’t contract problems:

• Ex-contractors with access to GitHub
• $10K in idle licenses discovered after renewal
• AI tools entering the environment without review
• Long-tail tools with no SCIM and no automation
• Offboarding that depends on human memory
• Access reviews that collapse into spreadsheets

These aren’t finance issues. They are identity governance and automation issues.

That’s why the best Zylo alternatives are the ones built for IT, Security, and Compliance, not just procurement.

Among them:

• Torii excels at workflow automation
• Zluri excels at easy visibility
• BetterCloud excels at policy enforcement
• Productiv excels at ROI analysis
• Nudge excels at Shadow IT detection
• AccessOwl excels at access requests
• Lumos excels at compliance evidence

But only one platform provides end-to-end governance for every app in your environment, including those without SCIM or APIs:

Stitchflow fixes the automation gap that Zylo can’t see.

Ready to automate the 40% of your SaaS stack that Zylo can't reach?

Stitchflow is the only platform that:

• Unlocks SCIM-like automation for any app
• Removes orphaned accounts automatically
• Reclaims unused licenses in real time
• Discovers Shadow IT + Shadow AI
• Supports multi-IDP environments
• Provides a unified governance platform
• Generates audit-ready evidence continuously
• Eliminates manual browser-based offboarding
• Avoids the SCIM tax entirely

You don’t just see the problem—you fix it, across 100% of your SaaS environment.

👉 Book a demo to see how stitched-together automation changes everything for IT, Security, and Compliance.