Top Zluri Alternatives for SaaS Management in 2025

Zluri is a good start — until scale exposes its limits.

It is often one of the first SaaS management platforms companies adopt: quick to deploy, useful for spotting redundant apps and tracking license usage, and strong at discovery. For most mid-sized IT teams, it’s a solid early-stage choice.

But cost savings stall fast when your environment grows more complex: multiple domains, contractor churn, decentralized purchasing, AI tools without single sign-on (SSO)/system for cross-domain identity management (SCIM), and increasing audit demands. Zluri’s strength in discovery doesn’t extend far enough into governance and automation.

You’re still:

• Exporting spreadsheets to reconcile accounts across tools
• Chasing app owners for status updates
• Manually reclaiming licenses before renewals
• Struggling with non-SCIM apps and disconnected systems
• Paying the “SSO/SCIM tax” just to automate a fraction of your stack

By renewal season, the window for meaningful savings or risk reduction is already closed.

If that sounds familiar, you’ve likely outgrown Zluri.

The next step isn’t just “more discovery”—it’s automated cleanup, enforced access policies, continuous identity-data sync, and a provable system of record for compliance and spend optimization.

This guide breaks down eight Zluri alternatives worth considering in 2025, starting with what to look for in a true replacement.

What to look for in a Zluri alternative

Before choosing a replacement, it’s worth defining why teams move beyond Zluri and what your next platform must deliver.

Zluri’s strengths

• Broad SaaS discovery via SSO, finance, and browser integrations
• License usage tracking and basic provisioning automation
• Alerts for select changes or anomalies

Zluri’s limitations

• Static dashboards instead of real-time reconciliation of accounts and licenses
• No identity-aware context (can’t tell “should have access” vs. “does have access”)
• Offboarding limited to SCIM-connected apps; no coverage for disconnected tools
• Limited human resource information system (HRIS) or IT service management (ITSM) integrations
• No remediation for orphaned accounts in unmanaged tools
• Compliance and user access reviews are still mostly manual, spreadsheet-driven tasks

5 capabilities to prioritize in a Zluri alternative

1. Real-time license reconciliation
   Usage changes daily; waiting for renewal cycles means wasted spend. Look for continuous monitoring with automated reclamation of idle licenses to recover savings as they appear.
2. Full offboarding coverage (even for disconnected apps)
   40–60% of the average SaaS stack lacks SCIM/SSO, leaving high-risk orphaned accounts. Your platform should cover CSV-based tools, ticket-driven systems, and long-tail SaaS without APIs.
3. Identity-aware access controls
   Raw login data isn’t enough for compliance or least privilege. Choose tools with identity stitching that map HR, identity providers (IdPs), and app data to detect mismatches, apply risk scores, and trigger automated cleanup.
4. Compliance-ready access reviews
   Auditors expect proof, not just visibility. Event-triggered, system-generated reviews with evidence logs remove the spreadsheet grind and accelerate audit readiness.
5. Flexible automation
   Real-world workflows include contractors, exceptions, and department-specific rules. Prioritize platforms with customizable triggers, multi-step approvals, and integrations across HRIS, ITSM, and collaboration tools.

Zluri alternatives at a glance

8 best Zluri alternatives for SaaS management

1. Stitchflow

Best for: IT, security, and compliance teams needing full SaaS governance, including disconnected apps and shadow AI tools

G2 Rating: 4.8/5

Where Zluri stops at surfacing data, Stitchflow acts on it. It’s not just a discovery tool; it’s a full-service SaaS governance engine that reconciles identity, access, usage, and licensing in real time, across both connected and disconnected apps.

If you’re dealing with:

• Orphaned accounts in tools without SCIM or API integrations
• Multi-IdP, cross-domain user management headaches
• License cleanup that only happens right before renewals
• Quarterly spreadsheet-based access reviews across 20+ apps
• Audit requests for provable, evidence-backed access control

…then Stitchflow is built for your environment.

Stitchflow’s proven results

Customers reclaim an average of $160K in the first 60 days with Stitchflow’s real-time license reconciliation and automation.

“Before Stitchflow, offboarding was a huge manual effort. We employ many contractors and spend hours each week tracking accounts across Jira tickets and spreadsheets. Now we have dashboards that instantly surface discrepancies. It’s been a game-changer.”

Turing, an AI/software company with 700 employees and 3,000+ contractors, faced escalating offboarding and compliance challenges. Dual IdPs, multiple domains, 100+ SaaS apps (including 14 Tier-1), and a 250:1 user-to-IT ratio created significant security risks and manual overhead. Over 40% of accounts were outside SCIM/SSO automation, leaving orphaned accounts unmanaged.

Deploying Stitchflow delivered immediate results. Within 30 minutes, Turing connected Okta, Google Workspace, and every app—via API or secure CSV—into a unified IT Graph. Continuous gap detection flagged orphaned, hidden, and idle accounts in real time, while one-click bulk remediation closed them.

Quantitative outcomes in 90 days:

• 312 offboarding gaps in Tier-1 apps fully remediated
• 150+ idle licenses reclaimed, saving $60K annually
• 1 full FTE of IT time freed for higher-value work
• 0 false positives in reporting
• Avoided significant SSO/SCIM tax costs for the contractor base
  

By automating governance across connected and disconnected apps, Stitchflow eliminated Turing’s offboarding backlog, ensured audit-ready evidence, and delivered rapid ROI.

“We didn’t need a dashboard. We needed a cleanup engine. Stitchflow deprovisioned 93% of 500+ orphaned accounts before the next renewal. It paid for itself in one sprint.”
— Edwin Katabaro, CISO, Turing

Why Stitchflow is a better alternative to Zluri

• From alerts to action: Zluri tells you there’s a problem. Stitchflow fixes it.
• Identity-aware governance: Zluri shows usage data. Stitchflow reconciles it with who should actually have access.
• 100% coverage: Zluri supports SCIM apps. Stitchflow automates even the disconnected ones.
• Renewal optimization: Zluri flags renewals. Stitchflow optimizes them with real usage and ownership context.

Zluri vs. Stitchflow: tackling shadow AI

Zluri may detect installed apps, but it struggles with AI tool sprawl, where employees adopt AI-based tools without security oversight.

Stitchflow continuously monitors domains, identity systems, and app activity to:

• Detect unauthorized AI usage
• Flag unassigned or orphaned accounts
• Provide IT/Security with immediate remediation paths.

Whether it’s ChatGPT Enterprise spun up without approval or rogue AI notetakers joining meetings, Stitchflow spots and resolves them before they become compliance risks.

Stitchflow: The “done-for-you” advantage

Most tools sell software. Stitchflow delivers software + service.

Through its done-for-you model, Stitchflow doesn’t just alert, it fixes. During onboarding, our team runs hands-on remediation, configures automation, and sets up help desk workflows tailored to your environment.

No steep learning curve. No months-long implementation lag. No waiting to see ROI.

This service-driven model is a core differentiator that Zluri and most competitors can’t match.

Key features of Stitchflow

• The IT Graph: Live mapping of every user, app, license, and entitlement from identity, finance, and system data.
• Real-time license reconciliation: Flags and recovers underused licenses automatically.
• Contractor lifecycle support: Tracks access and triggers offboarding on contract end or inactivity.
• Access Matrix: Instantly answers “who has access to what, and why?” across all tools.
• Always-on access reviews: Triggered by role changes, inactivity, or risk, not just quarterly schedules.
• Unmanaged app coverage: Works with CSVs, ITSM ticket systems, and long-tail apps others ignore.
• Integrated renewal workflows: Combines usage, contract details, and access waste to drive renewal decisions.

Stitchflow’s real-world use cases

Security & identity hygiene
When a contractor’s Okta account is disabled, Stitchflow automatically:

• Detects orphaned accounts in Zoom, Jira, or Slack—even without SCIM.
• Deprovisions, archives, or alerts via Slack/ITSM about lingering access.
• Logs every action with time-stamped audit evidence.

Cost savings & renewal control

• Flagged 100+ orphaned accounts for one customer, reclaimed $160K+, and cleaned up before renewal.
• Brought license costs in line with actual headcount in under 60 days.
• Continuous monitoring prevents waste from creeping back.

Workflow automation

• Triggers access reviews when multiple conditions are met (role change in Azure AD + inactivity >30 days in Jira + risk score threshold exceeded).
• Creates ITSM tickets or sends Slack alerts to relevant teams automatically.

Stitchflow is built for

• Organizations with multiple IdPs and domains
• Companies with high contractor churn
• Teams doing manual access reviews or license cleanups
• Security- and compliance-driven organizations
• Businesses managing long-tail, non-SCIM apps

Want to see Stitchflow in action?

How Stitchflow compares to Zluri

2. Torii

Best for: Ops and IT teams building scalable SaaS workflows and shadow IT detection

G2 Rating: 4.5/5

Torii is a Zluri alternative for teams that want to go beyond visibility and build automation into every step of the SaaS lifecycle. It focuses on helping IT and Ops scale by operationalizing onboarding, offboarding, and app ownership workflows across departments.

Torii’s low-code workflow engine enables you to build automated provisioning and deprovisioning flows that are triggered by events such as HR changes, role updates, or inactivity. If your organization is trying to reduce spreadsheet dependence and enforce clean access hygiene at scale, Torii is better than Zluri’s more limited templates.

Overview

Torii allows more flexibility in defining your own SaaS operations processes. You can tailor flows to reflect your internal policies, integrate directly with Jira, BambooHR, or ServiceNow, and detect shadow IT through both browser-based tracking and finance data analysis.

Key features

• Shadow IT discovery: Detects apps not connected to your SSO using browser extensions and finance data
• Workflow automation: Custom provisioning/offboarding flows tied to lifecycle events
• Integration library: 120+ connectors across HRIS, ITSM, SSO, and collaboration tools
• Spend tracking: Department-level spend reports and renewal timelines
• Ownership assignment: Designates responsible stakeholders for each application

Where Torii works well

• Companies scaling SaaS usage across departments
• Teams that want to customize onboarding/offboarding without relying solely on predefined templates
• Organizations looking to monitor self-serve tool adoption

3. Zylo

Best for: Finance and procurement teams focused on SaaS cost control and vendor management

G2 Rating: 4.8/5

Zylo positions itself as the system of record for SaaS spend. Unlike Zluri, which offers visibility into light workflows, Zylo delves deeper into financial control. It offers vendor negotiation, license cost optimization, and cross-departmental portfolio rationalization.

Zylo helps in environments where Finance or Procurement leads the SaaS management initiative. It provides them with full visibility into app ownership, contract terms, usage trends, and renewals, allowing them to collaborate with IT to optimize costs without operating in the dark.

Overview

While Zluri offers usage data, Zylo delivers contract-backed context. It allows teams to make renewal and consolidation decisions based on both financial and operational context. This approach supports organizations that need a deeper view into vendor relationships and cost structures in addition to usage metrics.

Key features of Zylo

• SaaS contract repository: Central storage for contracts, owners, and renewal terms
• Renewal forecasting: Timelines mapped against usage and historical spend
• License utilization benchmarks: Compare usage across similar vendors
• Portfolio rationalization: Identify redundant tools and consolidate spend
• Stakeholder engagement workflows: Drive informed renewal decisions across departments

Where Zylo works well

• Finance-led organizations managing hundreds of vendors
• Teams with renewal chaos or no centralized contract oversight
• Enterprises trying to consolidate duplicate tools across departments

4. BetterCloud

Best for: Security-conscious IT teams enforcing granular SaaS access and data controls

G2 Rating: 4.4/5

BetterCloud is an entirely different breed of platform. Rather than focusing on visibility or spend, it operates as a policy automation engine for SaaS. IT teams use BetterCloud to define and enforce precise access and data-sharing policies, especially in Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace ecosystems.

If your SaaS sprawl is creating compliance headaches or data security risks, BetterCloud provides a rules-based approach to lock things down.

Overview

Zluri lacks security enforcement and real-time access triggers. BetterCloud allows IT to define granular policies (e.g., “Revoke access if a user joins a sensitive group”) and respond automatically to security threats across SaaS environments.

Key features of BetterCloud

• Policy engine: Define rules for file sharing, group access, and user behavior
• Event-based automation: Trigger workflows based on role change, inactivity, or violations
• Audit trails: Real-time visibility into security-related actions and changes
• Data loss prevention: Control sensitive document sharing and group exposure
• Deep integrations: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Okta, and more

Where BetterCloud works well

• Mid-to-large enterprises with strict security/compliance needs
• Teams enforcing least privilege access and data governance
• Organizations requiring auditable, automated enforcement of SaaS policies

5. Productiv

Best for: CIOs, CFOs, and procurement teams making ROI-driven SaaS decisions

G2 Rating: 4.6/5

Productiv reframes SaaS management as a value optimization problem, not just a discovery or security task. It helps executive teams understand whether tools are actually delivering ROI by going beyond logins to track how features are used across teams.

Unlike Zluri, which shows basic usage stats, Productiv tracks feature-level adoption to reveal true engagement patterns. You can determine if your team is using only Slack messaging or also leveraging workflows and integrations, and adjust your licenses accordingly.

Overview

While Zluri provides usage statistics at a broader level, Productiv adds granularity by measuring engagement with specific features. This can help leadership align SaaS investment decisions with strategic goals and ensure spend is tied to actual value delivered.

Key features of Productiv

• Feature-level usage tracking: Measure how specific parts of apps are being used
• Department-level benchmarking: Compare adoption across teams or locations
• Vendor redundancy insights: Highlight overlapping tools with similar functions
• Executive dashboards: Align usage with strategic goals, not just IT tasks
• Renewal and contract planning: Track cost vs. value ahead of renewals

Where Productiv works well

• Leadership teams seeking better ROI visibility on SaaS investments
• Procurement teams evaluating vendor performance and overlap
• Organizations consolidating tools based on real adoption data

6. AccessOwl

Best for: Fast-moving teams looking to automate access requests inside Slack or Teams

G2 Rating: 4.7/5

AccessOwl provides lightweight access governance for environments where speed is more important than structure. Instead of complex approval systems, it allows employees to request and revoke access directly from Slack, with IT receiving automated workflows and audit trails behind the scenes.

Unlike Zluri, which is primarily a backend visibility tool, AccessOwl is employee-facing and integrates natively into daily workflows. It simplifies access provisioning while still enforcing policy, making it especially useful for organizations tired of Jira tickets or email-based access reviews.

Overview

Zluri’s strengths are in backend visibility and reporting, whereas AccessOwl is focused on the employee-facing experience of requesting and managing access. This makes it useful for organizations that want to streamline request handling without sacrificing traceability.

Key features of AccessOwl

• Slack/Teams-native access requests: Employees can request access from chat
• Role-based provisioning: Automatically grants access based on department or function
• Revocation and offboarding flows: Access tied to project or role lifecycle
• Built-in audit logs: Track who approved what and when
• Simple UI: Designed for speed, not complexity

Where Zluri works well

• Startups or fast-paced teams managing dozens of SaaS tools
• Companies with lean IT teams that want to decentralize access control
• Organizations using Slack/Teams as the central collaboration layer

7. Nudge Security

Best for: Security teams focused on shadow IT and employee-led SaaS adoption

G2 Rating: 4.7/5

Nudge Security flips the SaaS control problem by focusing on user behavior rather than IT enforcement. It discovers SaaS usage via telemetry—email, browser data, SSO events—and then engages users to remediate issues themselves through lightweight prompts (“nudges”).

Zluri surfaces apps you know about. Nudge surfaces the ones you don’t—and gives you a way to fix them without friction.

Overview

While Zluri focuses on backend visibility and management, Nudge Security emphasizes user engagement and behavior change to address shadow IT. This makes it well-suited for environments where employee-led adoption is common and strict enforcement may not be practical.

Key features of Nudge Security

• Shadow IT discovery: Detect SaaS usage via user behavior signals
• Security nudges: Send contextual prompts to encourage better practices
• Decentralized remediation: Let users fix access issues with guardrails
• Risk scoring: Prioritize action based on vendor risk and user role
• Identity context: Connect usage to identity and device data

Where Nudge Security works well

• Security teams aiming to reduce the risks of unmanaged SaaS without heavy-handed controls
• Organizations with high levels of employee-led application adoption
• Environments that require a balance between security oversight and user autonomy

8. Lumos

Best for: Governance and compliance teams needing audit-ready access reviews

G2 Rating: 4.7/5

Lumos focuses on access governance at scale, making it easy to centralize provisioning, automate reviews, and maintain compliance across your stack. It’s especially valuable for companies with regulatory requirements such as SOC 2, SOX, or ISO 27001.

Compared to Zluri, Lumos provides more depth in compliance automation and audit support. It integrates access review workflows with systems of record and provides clear logs to prove least privilege and review sign-off.

Overview

While Zluri focuses on SaaS discovery and usage reporting, Lumos provides deeper functionality for compliance-driven access governance. This includes automated review scheduling, integration with identity and HR systems, and audit-ready reporting.

Key features of Lumos

• Automated access reviews: Schedule and enforce policy-based reviews
• Self-service access requests: With role-based constraints and approvals
• Real-time entitlement tracking: Know who has access to what and why
• Audit-ready logs: Proof of review, revocation, and access enforcement
• Centralized provisioning hub: Tie access to HRIS and IdP triggers

Where Lumos works well

• Enterprises with formal compliance obligations under SOC 2, SOX, ISO 27001, or similar frameworks
• Teams managing reviews for 20+ SaaS apps
• IT and GRC teams are preparing for audits

Choosing the right Zluri alternative

If you’ve outgrown Zluri, you’re not alone.

Most teams hit a ceiling where discovery and basic automation are no longer enough. As your environment grows more complex, with multiple IDPs, high contractor turnover, decentralized app adoption, and increasing audit requirements, the cost of manual cleanup, compliance prep, and license waste balloons.

That’s when you need a platform that doesn’t just tell you what’s wrong, it fixes it.

Stitchflow gives IT, Security, and Compliance teams complete SaaS governance, including the disconnected and unmanaged apps Zluri leaves behind. From real-time license reclamation to shadow AI detection and done-for-you remediation, it’s built to close the gaps that cost you money and put you at risk.

Ready to see results with Stitchflow?

Stitchflow customers reclaim an average of $160K in the first 60 days, and that’s just the start.

• No waiting for the renewal season to act
• No manual spreadsheets for access reviews
• No blind spots for non-SCIM or shadow apps
• No “you figure it out” after implementation

Book a demo and see how Stitchflow replaces reactive cleanup with continuous governance, cost control, and compliance confidence.