Top Zluri Alternatives for SaaS Management in 2025

Zluri is a good start — until you outgrow it.

Zluri is often one of the first SaaS management platforms companies adopt. It’s simple, straightforward, and good at discovery. Most mid-sized IT teams utilize it to gain a better understanding of their stack, including which tools are in use, which apps are redundant, and how licenses are being utilized.

But here’s the problem: visibility isn’t enough when your company scales.

As soon as your organization starts growing across domains, hiring contractors, decentralizing software purchases, and facing audit requirements, Zluri’s core strengths—discovery and dashboards start to feel static. 

You still have to export spreadsheets. Chase down app owners. Manually reconcile access. And by the time renewals come around, it’s already too late to act.

If you’re:

• Still offboarding people manually
• Running quarterly access reviews in spreadsheets
• Discovering unused licenses after the invoice is paid
• Struggling with apps that don’t connect via SCIM

Then you’ve probably outgrown Zluri.

The good news? There are platforms that go further, automating cleanup, enforcing access policies, syncing identity data, and giving you a provable system of record for governance.

This blog breaks down 8 Zluri alternatives worth considering in 2025, starting with what to look for in a replacement.

What to look for in a Zluri alternative

Before diving into individual platforms, let’s get clear on why teams move beyond Zluri and what to prioritize when you’re evaluating its replacements.

Zluri strengths:

• SaaS discovery across connected systems (SSO, finance, browsers)
• License usage visibility
• Basic automation for provisioning and alerts

Zluri limitations:

• Static dashboards instead of real-time reconciliation
• No identity-aware context (who should have access?)
• Offboarding is limited to SCIM-connected apps
• Little support for HR or ticketing system integrations
• No remediation for orphaned accounts in unmanaged tools
• Compliance and access reviews are still mostly manual

So, what should a modern alternative deliver?

1. Real-time license reconciliation

• Why real-time license reconciliation matters: SaaS usage fluctuates daily. If you wait until renewal to clean up, you're leaving money on the table, often tens of thousands per app.
• Desired behavior: Constant monitoring with triggers to flag unused licenses and automatic cleanup (e.g., “License idle 30 days? Reclaim.”)
• Indicator of maturity: ROI reports that show savings within ~60 days of setup, like Stitchflow customer results.

2. Full offboarding coverage (Even for disconnected apps)

• Why it matters: 40–60% of the SaaS stack lacks SCIM/SSO; these orphaned accounts are high-risk vectors.
• Desired behavior: Platforms should ingest CSV data, monitor ticket systems, or run scripts to flag stale access.
• Indicator of maturity: Full coverage reports no lingering accounts two weeks post-exit, even for unsanctioned apps.

3. Identity-aware access controls

• Why it matters: You need to know who has access and why. Raw login data isn’t enough for compliance or audits.
• Desired behavior: Identity stitching across systems, risk-scored mismatches, and automated remediations.
• Indicator of maturity: Reports answering “who has access to what and why,” and demonstrating least privilege.

4. Compliance-ready access reviews

• Why it matters: Regulators expect proof, not just visibility. Manual spreadsheets don’t cut it.
• Desired behavior: Scheduled or event-triggered reviews with evidence logged, delegated reviewers, and follow-up actions.
• Indicator of maturity: Audit-ready dashboards, logs of approvals, and historical review data.

5. Flexible automation

• Why it matters: Your workflows aren’t generic. You’ve got department-specific rules, contractors, exceptions, and hybrid tools.
• Desired behavior: Truly customizable triggers, multi-step approvals, and integrations (Slack, Jira, ServiceNow).
• Indicator of maturity: A single rule engine that handles multiple workflows, instead of rigid templates.

8 best Zluri alternatives for SaaS management

1. Stitchflow

Best for: IT-led teams with complex identity environments, high contractor volume, and unmanaged apps
G2 Rating: 4.8/5

Where Zluri stops at surfacing data, Stitchflow acts on it. It’s not just a discovery tool; it’s a full-service SaaS governance engine that reconciles identity, access, usage, and licensing in real time.

If you’re struggling with:

• Orphaned accounts in tools not connected to SCIM
• Cross-domain, multi-IDP user management
• Manual license cleanup before renewals
• Quarterly access reviews across 20+ apps
• Providing access control to auditors

Then Stitchflow was built for your environment.

Customers reclaim an average of $180K in the first 60 days using Stitchflow’s real-time license reconciliation and automation.

“We didn’t need a dashboard. We needed a cleanup engine. Stitchflow deprovisioned 93% of 500+ orphaned accounts before the next renewal. It paid for itself in one sprint.”
— Edwin Katabaro, CISO, Turing

“Before Stitchflow, offboarding was a huge manual effort. We employ many contractors and spend hours each week tracking accounts across Jira tickets and spreadsheets. Now we have dashboards that instantly surface discrepancies. It’s been a game changer.” [Read the full story]

Why Stitchflow is a better alternative to Zluri:

• Zluri tells you there’s a problem. Stitchflow fixes it.
• Zluri shows usage data. Stitchflow reconciles it with who should actually have access.
• Zluri supports SCIM apps. Stitchflow automates even the disconnected ones.
• Zluri flags renewals. Stitchflow optimizes them with real usage and ownership context.

Tackling shadow AI:

Zluri may detect installed apps, but it struggles with AI tool sprawl—new AI-based tools are adopted by individuals without IT visibility.

Stitchflow handles Shadow AI differently. It monitors app activity, domains, and behavior across identity systems to surface unauthorized AI usage, flag unassigned accounts, and help security and IT teams take quick remediation steps. 

Whether it’s ChatGPT Enterprise accounts spun up without approval or rogue AI notetakers, Stitchflow spots and resolves them before they become compliance risks.

The “Done-for-you” advantage

Most tools offer software. Stitchflow offers software + service.

Through its “done-for-you” model, Stitchflow doesn’t just alert you—it fixes things. Its onboarding includes hands-on remediation, policy automation setup, and help desk workflows tailored to your environment. 

No learning curve. No implementation dead zones. No waiting six months to see a return on investment.

This is a core differentiator that Zluri and most other competitors don’t offer.

Key features

• The IT Graph: Live mapping of every user, app, license, and entitlement, built from identity, finance, and system data.
• Real-time license reconciliation: Automatically flags and recovers underused licenses across your stack.
• Contractor lifecycle support: Tracks contractor access and initiates offboarding based on contract end or inactivity.
• Access Matrix: Instantly answers “who has access to what, and why?” across all your tools.
• Always-on access reviews: Triggered by role changes, inactivity, or security risk, no more quarterly spreadsheet reviews.
• Unmanaged app coverage: Works with CSVs, ticket systems, and long-tail apps that others ignore.
• Integrated renewal workflows: Includes usage data, contract details, and access to waste to support renewal decisions.

Real-world use cases

Security & identity hygiene

When a contractor’s Okta account is disabled, Stitchflow will automatically:

1. Detect orphaned Zoom, Jira, or Slack accounts, even if they’re not SCIM-connected.
2. Deprovision, archive, or alert via Slack or ITSM about lingering access.
3. Record the action for audit trails and compliance logs.

Cost savings & renewal control

• Automatically flagged 100+ orphaned accounts, reclaimed over $180K, and cleaned up before renewal for a customer. [Read the full story] 
• Brought license costs in line with team headcount within 60 days.
• Continual measurement: This cleanup reappears month after month unless your stack undergoes drastic changes.

Workflow automation

• Dynamically trigger access reviews when multiple criteria are met: role change in Azure AD, inactivity > 30 days in Jira, or breached threshold in risk model.
• Automated ticket creation or Slack alerts for cross-functional teams.

Built for:

• Organizations with multiple IDPs and domains
• Companies with high contractor churn
• Teams doing manual access reviews or license cleanup
• Security and compliance-conscious orgs
• Businesses that manage long-tail, non-SCIM apps

Want to see Stitchflow in action?

How Stitchflow compares to Zluri

Torii is a strong Zluri alternative for teams that want to go beyond visibility and build automation into every step of the SaaS lifecycle. It focuses on helping IT and Ops scale by operationalizing onboarding, offboarding, and app ownership workflows across departments.

What makes Torii stand out is its low-code workflow engine, which enables you to build automated provisioning and deprovisioning flows that trigger based on events like HR changes, role updates, or inactivity. 

If your org is trying to reduce spreadsheet dependence and enforce clean access hygiene at scale, Torii is a major upgrade from Zluri’s more limited templates.

Why Torii may be a better Zluri alternative:
Torii provides you with more flexibility in defining your own SaaS operations processes. You can tailor flows to reflect your internal policies, integrate directly with Jira, BambooHR, or ServiceNow, and detect shadow IT via browser-based tracking, not just finance data.

Key features

• Shadow IT discovery: Detects apps not connected to your SSO using browser extensions and finance data
• Workflow automation: Custom provisioning/offboarding flows tied to lifecycle events
• Integration library: 120+ connectors across HRIS, ITSM, SSO, and collaboration tools
• Spend tracking: Department-level spend reports and renewal timelines
• Ownership assignment: Ensures every app has a responsible stakeholder

Ideal for

• Companies scaling SaaS usage across departments
• Teams that want to customize onboarding/offboarding without coding
• Organizations looking to monitor self-serve tool adoption

3. Zylo

Best for: Finance and procurement teams focused on SaaS cost control and vendor management
G2 Rating: 4.8/5

Zylo positions itself as the system of record for SaaS spend. Unlike Zluri, which offers visibility into light workflows, Zylo delves deeper into financial control. It excels at vendor negotiation, license cost optimization, and cross-departmental portfolio rationalization.

Zylo is particularly strong in environments where Finance or Procurement leads the SaaS management initiative. It provides them with full visibility into app ownership, contract terms, usage trends, and renewals, allowing them to collaborate with IT to optimize costs without operating in the dark.

Why Zylo may be a better Zluri alternative:
While Zluri offers usage data, Zylo delivers contract-backed context. If your team is focused on reducing SaaS waste, negotiating better deals, and improving vendor visibility across business units, Zylo goes far beyond what Zluri provides.

Key features

• SaaS contract repository: Central storage for contracts, owners, and renewal terms
• Renewal forecasting: Timelines mapped against usage and historical spend
• License utilization benchmarks: Compare usage across similar vendors
• Portfolio rationalization: Identify redundant tools and consolidate spend
• Stakeholder engagement workflows: Drive informed renewal decisions across departments

Ideal for

• Finance-led organizations managing hundreds of vendors
• Teams with renewal chaos or no centralized contract oversight
• Enterprises are trying to consolidate duplicate tools across departments

4. BetterCloud

Best for: Security-conscious IT teams enforcing granular SaaS access and data controls
G2 Rating: 4.4/5

BetterCloud is an entirely different breed of platform. Rather than focusing on visibility or spend, it operates as a policy automation engine for SaaS. IT teams use BetterCloud to define and enforce precise access and data-sharing policies, especially in Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace ecosystems.

If your SaaS sprawl is creating compliance headaches or data security risks, BetterCloud provides a rules-based approach to lock things down.

Why BetterCloud may be a better Zluri alternative:
Zluri lacks security enforcement and real-time access triggers. BetterCloud allows IT to define granular policies (e.g., “Revoke access if a user joins a sensitive group”) and respond automatically to security threats across SaaS environments.

Key features

• Policy engine: Define rules for file sharing, group access, and user behavior
• Event-based automation: Trigger workflows based on role change, inactivity, or violations
• Audit trails: Real-time visibility into security-related actions and changes
• Data loss prevention: Control sensitive document sharing and group exposure
• Deep integrations: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Okta, and more

Ideal for

• Mid-to-large enterprises with strict security/compliance needs
• Teams enforcing least privilege access and data governance
• Organizations needing audit-friendly policy enforcement

Here’s the next set of detailed entries for the blog, covering Productiv, AccessOwl, Nudge Security, and Lumos, each with a clear position on how it compares to Zluri:

5. Productiv

Best for: CIOs, CFOs, and procurement teams making ROI-driven SaaS decisions
G2 Rating: 4.6/5

Productiv reframes SaaS management as a value optimization problem, not just a discovery or security task. It helps executive teams understand whether tools are actually delivering ROI by going beyond logins to track how features are used across teams.

Unlike Zluri, which shows basic usage stats, Productiv tracks feature-level adoption to reveal true engagement patterns. You can determine if your team is using only Slack messaging or also leveraging workflows and integrations, and adjust your licenses accordingly.

Why Productiv may be a better Zluri alternative:
If you’re reporting to finance or the board on SaaS ROI, Productiv’s dashboards give you a much clearer picture than Zluri’s high-level license and login data.

Key features

• Feature-level usage tracking: Measure how specific parts of apps are being used
• Department-level benchmarking: Compare adoption across teams or locations
• Vendor redundancy insights: Highlight overlapping tools with similar functions
• Executive dashboards: Align usage with strategic goals, not just IT tasks
• Renewal and contract planning: Track cost vs. value ahead of renewals

Ideal for

• Leadership teams seeking better ROI visibility
• Procurement teams benchmarking vendors
• Organizations consolidating tools across teams

6. AccessOwl

Best for: Fast-moving teams looking to automate access requests inside Slack or Teams
G2 Rating: 4.7/5

AccessOwl provides lightweight access governance for environments where speed is more important than structure. Instead of complex approval systems, it allows employees to request and revoke access directly from Slack, with IT receiving automated workflows and audit trails behind the scenes.

Unlike Zluri, which is primarily a backend visibility tool, AccessOwl is employee-facing and integrates natively into daily workflows. It simplifies access provisioning while still enforcing policy, making it especially useful for organizations tired of Jira tickets or email-based access reviews.

Why AccessOwl may be a better Zluri alternative:
If you’re looking to streamline access requests without compromising auditability, AccessOwl offers a faster, simpler, and more user-friendly approach.

Key features

• Slack/Teams-native access requests: Employees can request access from chat
• Role-based provisioning: Automatically grants access based on department or function
• Revocation and offboarding flows: Access tied to project or role lifecycle
• Built-in audit logs: Track who approved what and when
• Simple UI: Designed for speed, not complexity

Ideal for

• Startups or fast-paced teams managing dozens of tools
• Companies with lean IT teams that want to decentralize access control
• Orgs using Slack/Teams as the central collaboration layer

7. Nudge Security

Best for: Security teams focused on shadow IT and employee-led SaaS adoption
G2 Rating: 4.6/5

Nudge Security flips the SaaS control problem by focusing on user behavior rather than IT enforcement. It discovers SaaS usage via telemetry—email, browser data, SSO events—and then engages users to remediate issues themselves through lightweight prompts (“nudges”).

Zluri surfaces apps you know about. Nudge surfaces the ones you don’t—and gives you a way to fix them without friction.

Why Nudge Security may be a better Zluri alternative:
If you’re overwhelmed by shadow IT and need a scalable way to drive secure behavior without policing every tool, Nudge Security fills the gap Zluri can’t.

Key features

• Shadow IT discovery: Detect SaaS usage via user behavior signals
• Security nudges: Send contextual prompts to encourage better practices
• Decentralized remediation: Let users fix access issues with guardrails
• Risk scoring: Prioritize action based on vendor risk and user role
• Identity context: Connect usage to identity and device data

Ideal for

• Security teams looking to reduce friction around SaaS usage
• Organizations with lots of user-led tool adoption
• Environments where enforcement needs to be light-touch but effective

8. Lumos

Best for: Governance and compliance teams needing audit-ready access reviews
G2 Rating: 4.7/5

Lumos focuses on access governance at scale, making it easy to centralize provisioning, automate reviews, and maintain compliance across your stack. It’s especially valuable for companies with regulatory requirements such as SOC 2, SOX, or ISO 27001.

Compared to Zluri, Lumos provides more depth in compliance automation and audit support. It integrates access review workflows with systems of record and provides clear logs to prove least privilege and review sign-off.

Why Lumos may be a better Zluri alternative:
If your team is drowning in spreadsheets to prep for audits, Lumos is built to automate access reviews, map approvals, and generate compliance evidence, something Zluri isn’t designed to handle.

Key features

• Automated access reviews: Schedule and enforce policy-based reviews
• Self-service access requests: With role-based constraints and approvals
• Real-time entitlement tracking: Know who has access to what and why
• Audit-ready logs: Proof of review, revocation, and access enforcement
• Centralized provisioning hub: Tie access to HRIS and IDP triggers

Ideal for

• Mid-to-large enterprises with formal compliance obligations
• Teams managing reviews for 20+ SaaS apps
• IT and GRC teams are preparing for audits

Zluri alternatives at a glance

Conclusion: Choosing the right Zluri alternative

Zluri gives you visibility. But visibility without action leads to missed offboarding, wasted licenses, and fire-drill audits.

Stitchflow was built to go further.

If you’re still reconciling spreadsheets before renewals, chasing down app owners for access reviews, or discovering unmanaged apps after they’ve caused problems, then Zluri has likely reached its limits.

Stitchflow gives you 100% SaaS coverage, not just for connected apps, but across:

• Disconnected tools without SCIM or APIs
• Contractor access that’s hard to track
• Shadow AI tools your team adopts without IT’s knowledge
• CSV-based systems and ticketing workflows are the most common tools ignored

And unlike other platforms that just send alerts or require heavy customization, Stitchflow’s done-for-you service model means setup isn’t your burden. We clean up, automate, and maintain the environment with you.

• 93% of orphaned accounts were cleaned up before renewal.
• Most teams achieve meaningful license savings within the first 60 days, without relying on spreadsheets or manual reviews.
• Always-on reviews, access audits, and license optimization, without waiting for quarterly reports.

If your goal is full-stack SaaS governance, not just dashboards, Stitchflow is the only solution that delivers:

• 100% offboarding coverage
• Real-time reconciliation
• Identity-based access mapping
• Built-in renewal intelligence
• Shadow AI detection and control
• Compliance-ready reviews across your stack

Other tools specialize. Stitchflow covers everything.

Ready to move beyond visibility?

Book a demo today to see how Stitchflow will be the right fit for your organization.