Stitchflow
Axure RP logo

Axure RP SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Axure RP user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Axure RP, the wireframing and prototyping platform used by UX teams worldwide, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Axure offers SAML 2.0 SSO for authentication on Business and Enterprise plans, this only handles login verification—not user lifecycle management. Teams must still manually create user accounts, assign project permissions, and manage access to shared prototypes. For organizations with distributed design teams or frequent contractor onboarding, this creates a significant administrative burden.

The gap becomes particularly problematic for design-driven organizations where prototype access needs to be tightly controlled. Without automated provisioning, IT teams face a choice between manual user management (slowing down design workflows) or over-provisioning access (creating security risks around sensitive product designs). LDAP and Active Directory integration is limited to on-premises Axure Cloud deployments only, leaving cloud customers without directory-based provisioning options.

The strategic alternative

Axure RP has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0, LDAP, Active Directory
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaNo Axure-specific integration in Okta OIN. SAML SSO can be configured manually.
Microsoft Entra IDNo Axure-specific integration in Entra Gallery. SAML SSO can be configured manually.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Axure RP accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Axure RP pricing problem

Axure RP gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Pro$29/user/mo (annual)
Team$49/user/mo (annual)
BusinessCustom pricing
EnterpriseCustom pricing

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Pro$29/user/mo (annual)
Team$49/user/mo (annual)
BusinessCustom pricing
EnterpriseCustom pricing

What this means in practice

Without SCIM, IT admins managing Axure RP face several operational challenges:

Manual onboarding required
Every new designer must be manually invited and assigned to team projects
No automated deprovisioning
Departing employees retain access until manually removed
Project access management
Team project permissions must be configured individually
Limited visibility
No centralized view of who has access to what prototypes

JIT provisioning via SAML helps with authentication but doesn't solve the core user lifecycle management problem.

Additional constraints

LDAP/AD limited to on-premises
Directory integration only works with self-hosted Axure Cloud servers, not the SaaS version
Business tier minimum for SSO
Even basic SAML authentication requires expensive Business-tier pricing
No IdP gallery integrations
Manual SAML configuration required - no pre-built connectors in Okta OIN or Entra Gallery
Team project complexity
Designers need appropriate project-level permissions that can't be automated without SCIM

Summary of challenges

  • Axure RP does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Axure RP actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Business/Enterprise plans)

Axure RP supports SAML 2.0 integration for cloud-based authentication:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Entra ID, Google Workspace, custom SAML providers
JIT Provisioning✓ Yes - converts standard accounts to SSO
User requirementCan create accounts on first login via JIT
Plan requirementBusiness account or higher

LDAP/Active Directory (On-premises only)

For organizations running on-premises Axure Cloud servers:

FeatureSupported?
LDAP authentication✓ Yes
Active Directory integration✓ Yes
Cloud deployment❌ On-premises only
Automated provisioning❌ Authentication only

Critical gap: Axure RP has no native SCIM provisioning documented anywhere. The SAML integration handles authentication with JIT account creation, but there's no automated way to:

Provision users before first login
Update user attributes from your IdP
Automatically deprovision users when they leave
Sync group memberships or team project access
Manage prototype sharing permissions programmatically

Okta & Entra ID Integration Status

PlatformStatus
Okta Integration NetworkNo dedicated Axure app listed
Entra ID GalleryNo dedicated Axure app listed
Manual SAML setupRequired for SSO
Provisioning supportNone available

For design teams managing multiple projects and stakeholder access, this means user lifecycle management remains entirely manual - you'll be adding, updating, and removing users through the Axure Cloud web interface.

What IT admins are saying

Axure RP's manual user management approach frustrates IT teams managing design workflows:

  • No SCIM provisioning means every user addition, removal, or role change requires manual intervention
  • LDAP/Active Directory integration only works with on-premises Axure Cloud servers, not the cloud version
  • Team project access and prototype sharing permissions must be managed separately from identity providers
  • SSO setup requires manual SAML configuration without pre-built integrations in major IdP galleries

We have to manually add every designer to Axure and then separately manage their project permissions. When someone leaves, we have to remember to remove them from both our IdP and Axure - it's easy to miss.

IT Director, Design Agency

The LDAP integration looks promising until you realize it's only for on-premises deployments. Most teams are using Axure Cloud, so you're back to manual user management.

Systems Administrator, SaaS Company

The recurring theme

Design teams need rapid onboarding for project collaboration, but Axure's manual provisioning creates delays and security gaps when user access isn't properly synchronized with corporate identity systems.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small UX team (<10 designers) with stable membershipManual management with SAML SSO for authentication
Growing design organization (15+ users) with frequent project changesUse Stitchflow: prototype access management becomes complex
Enterprise with multiple design teams and compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automation essential for audit trail and governance
Agency or consultancy with rotating client project teamsUse Stitchflow: frequent user/project changes require automation
Organizations requiring immediate offboarding for IP protectionUse Stitchflow: instant deprovisioning critical for design assets

The bottom line

Axure RP offers powerful prototyping capabilities but completely lacks SCIM provisioning—leaving design teams with manual user management or basic JIT via SAML. For organizations where prototype access control and timely user lifecycle management matter, Stitchflow eliminates the operational overhead.

Make Axure RP workflows AI-native

Axure RP has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No native SCIM provisioning documentedLDAP/AD only for on-premises Axure Cloud serversSSO requires Business account or higherTeam or Enterprise edition required for team projects

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No native SCIM provisioning documented
  • LDAP/AD only for on-premises Axure Cloud servers
  • SSO requires Business account or higher
  • Team or Enterprise edition required for team projects

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Axure RP

Axure RP has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Axure RP logo
Axure RP
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide