Summary and recommendation
Building Engines, the comprehensive facility management platform now owned by JLL Technologies, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. Despite offering Enterprise-tier features and SOC 2 Type II certification through their Prism platform, Building Engines requires manual user management even for their highest-tier Enterprise customers with custom pricing. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing facility operations staff, contractors, and building occupants who need access to work orders, maintenance requests, and facility data.
The lack of automated provisioning is particularly problematic in facility management scenarios where user populations are dynamic—contractors come and go, tenants change, and facility staff turnover requires rapid access adjustments. Manual provisioning delays can impact critical facility operations, and the absence of automated deprovisioning creates security risks when personnel no longer need access to sensitive building systems and data.
The strategic alternative
Building Engines has no native SCIM. That leaves a workflow gap in offboarding, access reviews, and license cleanup unless your team handles the app another way. Stitchflow builds and maintains the IT workflows your team still runs manually, across every app, including the ones without APIs.
Quick SCIM facts
| SCIM available? | No |
| SCIM tier required | N/A |
| SSO required first? | No |
| SSO available? | Yes |
| SSO protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Documentation | Not available |
Supported identity providers
| IdP | SSO | SCIM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta | Via third-party | ❌ | No Okta OIN integration found |
| Microsoft Entra ID | Via third-party | ❌ | No Microsoft Entra integration documentation found |
| Google Workspace | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
| OneLogin | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
The cost of not automating
Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Building Engines accounts manually. Here's what that costs:
The Building Engines pricing problem
Building Engines gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.
Tier comparison
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | Custom quote |
Pricing and provisioning structure
| Plan | Pricing | SCIM | SSO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | Custom quote | ❌ Not available | Unknown |
Key constraints
What this means in practice
Without SCIM or documented APIs, Building Engines user management is entirely manual:
For property management companies with seasonal staff or frequent role changes, this creates significant administrative overhead and security risks.
Additional constraints
Summary of challenges
- Building Engines does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
- Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
- Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually
What Building Engines actually offers for identity
No Native SCIM or SSO
Building Engines (now part of JLL Technologies) does not offer any native identity management features:
| Feature | Supported? |
|---|---|
| SAML SSO | ❌ No |
| OIDC SSO | ❌ No |
| SCIM provisioning | ❌ No |
| API-based provisioning | ❌ No |
| Okta integration | ❌ No |
| Entra integration | ❌ No |
Enterprise Pricing Without Identity Features
Building Engines operates on a custom Enterprise pricing model, but this upgrade includes:
What's missing: Despite Enterprise-level pricing, there are no automated user provisioning or SSO capabilities. IT teams must manually manage all user accounts, passwords, and access permissions.
The Manual Reality
Without native identity features, Building Engines requires:
This creates significant administrative overhead and security risks, especially for organizations managing multiple properties and large teams.
What IT admins are saying
Building Engines's lack of automated provisioning creates significant overhead for IT teams managing property management software access:
- Manual user creation required for every new employee across properties
- No integration with identity providers despite enterprise-level pricing
- Difficult to maintain consistent access controls across multiple building portfolios
- Time-consuming offboarding process when staff leave or change roles
We're paying enterprise prices but still doing everything manually. Every new property manager or maintenance tech has to be set up by hand.
Building Engines has all the security certifications but none of the modern provisioning features. It's 2024 and we're still managing users like it's 2014.
The recurring theme
Despite custom enterprise pricing and SOC 2 certification, Building Engines lacks the automated provisioning capabilities that IT teams expect from modern SaaS platforms, creating manual overhead that scales poorly with organization growth.
The decision
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Small property management team (<10 users) | Manual management may be sufficient |
| Growing property portfolio with frequent staff changes | Use Stitchflow: automation essential for scaling |
| Enterprise property management (50+ users) | Use Stitchflow: automation required for efficiency |
| Multi-location operations with distributed teams | Use Stitchflow: centralized provisioning critical |
| JLL or enterprise client with compliance requirements | Use Stitchflow: automated audit trail necessary |
The bottom line
Building Engines has no native SCIM. That means one more workflow gap in offboarding, access reviews, and license cleanup unless your team handles it another way.
Close the Building Engines workflow gap
Building Engines is one gap in a broader workflow. Stitchflow builds and maintains the offboarding, access review, or license workflow across every app in your environment.
Technical specifications
SCIM Version
Not specifiedSupported Operations
Not specifiedSupported Attributes
Plan requirement
Not specifiedPrerequisites
Not specifiedKey limitations
- No public SCIM documentation available
- Now part of JLL Technologies (JLLT)
- Prism platform is SOC 2 Type II certified
- Custom enterprise pricing model
Documentation not available.
Close the workflow gap in
Building Engines
Building Engines has no native SCIM. That leaves one more workflow gap in offboarding, access reviews, and license cleanup unless your team handles it another way.
Start with the free gap diagnostic


