Stitchflow
Charles River IMS logo

Charles River IMS SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Charles River IMS user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM not available

Summary and recommendation

Charles River IMS, State Street's enterprise investment management platform managing $59 trillion in assets across 30 countries, provides no SCIM provisioning capabilities or public SSO integration documentation. As an enterprise-only platform with custom pricing that's part of the broader State Street Alpha ecosystem, Charles River IMS requires manual user management despite serving global financial institutions that need rigorous access controls. The platform's G-SIFI security standards and regulatory requirements make manual provisioning particularly problematic—IT teams must manually create, update, and deactivate user accounts across what's often a complex multi-module deployment.

This creates a significant compliance gap for financial institutions using Charles River IMS. Manual user lifecycle management in a platform handling trillions in assets increases the risk of orphaned accounts, delayed deprovisioning, and audit failures. Given the platform's enterprise-only nature and integration with broader State Street services, organizations often have hundreds of users across trading, compliance, and operations teams who require different permission levels—all managed manually.

The strategic alternative

Charles River IMS has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaVia third-partyNo Charles River integration found in Okta OIN catalog
Microsoft Entra IDVia third-partyNo Microsoft Entra provisioning documentation found for Charles River IMS
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Charles River IMS accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Charles River IMS pricing problem

Charles River IMS gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
EnterpriseCustom quote (enterprise only)

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSCIM
EnterpriseCustom quote (enterprise only)❌ Not available

Charles River IMS operates exclusively as an enterprise platform with custom pricing. No standard pricing tiers or self-service options exist.

What this means in practice

Complete manual provisioning: Every user account requires manual creation, configuration, and deprovisioning through Charles River's proprietary admin interface. For financial institutions managing hundreds of portfolio managers, analysts, and compliance officers, this creates significant operational overhead.

No identity provider integration: Charles River IMS doesn't appear in Okta's OIN catalog or Microsoft Entra's app gallery. Organizations can't leverage their existing IdP infrastructure for seamless access management.

Enterprise procurement complexity: As part of State Street's Alpha platform, procurement involves enterprise sales cycles, custom contracts, and integration planning that can extend for months.

Additional constraints

G-SIFI security requirements
Built for Global Systemically Important Financial Institutions, creating additional security layers that complicate integration
State Street ecosystem dependency
User management may require coordination across multiple State Street Alpha platform components
No public API documentation
Integration capabilities are limited to what's available through enterprise support channels
Geographic compliance complexity
With operations across 30 countries, user provisioning must account for regional regulatory requirements

Summary of challenges

  • Charles River IMS does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Charles River IMS actually offers for identity

Charles River Investment Management Solution (IMS) provides no publicly documented identity management features despite being a $59 trillion asset management platform owned by State Street.

No Public SSO Documentation

Charles River IMS has no available SAML SSO documentation or integration guides:

FeatureAvailable?
SAML SSOUnknown - no docs
OIDC SSOUnknown - no docs
Identity federationUnknown - no docs
Multi-factor authenticationUnknown - no docs

No IdP Integrations

Standard enterprise identity providers show no Charles River integrations:

Identity ProviderIntegration Status
OktaNot found in OIN catalog
Microsoft EntraNo provisioning docs available
Google WorkspaceNo documented integration
OneLoginNo documented integration

Enterprise-Only Platform Challenges

Charles River IMS operates as an enterprise-only solution with several identity management challenges:

No SCIM provisioning
Zero documentation for automated user lifecycle management
Custom enterprise deployments
Each implementation likely requires bespoke identity integration
G-SIFI security requirements
Global Systemically Important Financial Institution standards may limit standard integrations
State Street ecosystem
Identity management may be handled at the broader Alpha platform level

Reality check: For a platform managing $59 trillion across 30 countries, the complete absence of public identity management documentation suggests either highly customized enterprise implementations or significant gaps in modern identity standards support.

What IT admins are saying

Charles River IMS's enterprise-only model and lack of automated provisioning creates significant challenges for IT teams managing access at scale:

  • Manual user provisioning across a platform managing $59 trillion in assets
  • No public documentation for SSO or SCIM integration capabilities
  • Custom enterprise pricing with no transparency on lower-tier options
  • Integration complexity stemming from State Street's G-SIFI security requirements

We're managing hundreds of users across Charles River and every onboarding requires manual coordination with their support team. There's no self-service provisioning documentation anywhere.

IT Director, Asset Management Firm

The lack of standard SSO integration docs makes it feel like every Charles River deployment is a custom project, even for basic identity management.

Infrastructure Manager, Financial Services

The recurring theme

Charles River IMS treats user provisioning as a bespoke enterprise service rather than a standard IT capability, forcing teams to rely on vendor support for routine access management tasks.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small investment team (<10 users)Manual management acceptable given enterprise-only platform
Mid-size asset manager (10-50 users)Use Stitchflow: manual processes don't scale for portfolio management systems
Large institutional investor (50+ users)Use Stitchflow: automation essential for compliance and operational efficiency
Multi-entity financial organizationUse Stitchflow: centralized provisioning critical for cross-entity portfolio oversight
Regulatory environment requiring audit trailsUse Stitchflow: automated provisioning provides complete access documentation

The bottom line

Charles River IMS is a $59 trillion asset management platform with zero native identity management capabilities—no SCIM, no SSO integrations, and enterprise-only availability. For investment firms that need automated user provisioning without the operational overhead of manual account management, Stitchflow delivers the automation that Charles River should have built.

Make Charles River IMS workflows AI-native

Charles River IMS has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No SCIM provisioning documentation foundNo public SSO/SAML integration informationEnterprise-only platform owned by State StreetManages $59 trillion in assets across 30 countriesPart of State Street Alpha platformBuilt with G-SIFI (Global Systemically Important Financial Institution) security standards

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No SCIM provisioning documentation found
  • No public SSO/SAML integration information
  • Enterprise-only platform owned by State Street
  • Manages $59 trillion in assets across 30 countries
  • Part of State Street Alpha platform
  • Built with G-SIFI (Global Systemically Important Financial Institution) security standards

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Charles River IMS

Charles River IMS has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Charles River IMS logo
Charles River IMS
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Abnormal Security logo

Abnormal Security

No SCIM

Security / Email Security

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Abnormal Security, the AI-powered email security platform protecting against BEC and phishing attacks, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the platform supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not automated user lifecycle management. Security teams must manually provision and deprovision analyst access through Abnormal's portal, creating operational overhead and potential security gaps in a platform specifically designed to protect against email-based threats. This manual provisioning model creates significant challenges for security operations. When new SOC analysts join or existing team members change roles, IT admins must coordinate manual account creation and permission updates in Abnormal Security. For a platform that's critical to threat detection and incident response, delays in provisioning can leave security gaps, while delayed deprovisioning creates compliance risks. The irony is stark: a security platform designed to prevent account takeover and credential abuse lacks the automated provisioning controls that prevent exactly these risks.

View full guide
Airwallex logo

Airwallex

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Airwallex, the global payments and treasury platform, offers no SCIM provisioning support on any plan, including their custom Accelerate enterprise tier. Despite being positioned for enterprise use with features like multi-entity management and advanced treasury controls, Airwallex lacks any official identity provider integrations—no SSO, no provisioning, and no presence in major IdP galleries like Okta's OIN or Microsoft Entra. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing financial access across growing organizations, where manual user provisioning and deprovisioning in a payments platform presents both efficiency and security risks. The absence of identity management capabilities means IT administrators must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Airwallex—a particularly concerning gap given that this platform handles sensitive financial operations, cross-border payments, and treasury management. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees could retain access to financial systems, creating compliance risks and potential security vulnerabilities that most finance and IT teams cannot afford to overlook.

View full guide
Alkami logo

Alkami

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alkami, the digital banking platform used by banks and credit unions, does not offer SCIM provisioning or public SSO integrations. As an enterprise-only platform with custom pricing, Alkami appears to handle user management through direct account administration rather than standardized identity protocols. This creates significant challenges for financial institutions that need to integrate Alkami with their existing identity infrastructure—particularly problematic given the compliance requirements and security standards that banks must maintain. The lack of automated provisioning means IT teams at financial institutions must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Alkami. For a platform handling sensitive financial data and customer information, this manual approach introduces compliance risks and operational overhead. Banks typically require seamless integration between their core identity systems and all applications accessing customer data.

View full guide