Summary and recommendation
Concord, the contract lifecycle management platform, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any documented plan. While Concord provides SAML SSO integration with major identity providers like Okta and Azure AD, this only handles authentication for existing users. IT teams must manually provision and deprovision users across contract management workflows, which is particularly problematic given Concord's role-based access model for legal teams, procurement, and sales users who need different contract visibility and signature authority levels.
This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing contract access. Without automated provisioning, organizations risk compliance issues when employees change roles or leave the company but retain access to sensitive contract data and signature capabilities. Manual user management also slows onboarding for legal and procurement staff who need immediate access to active contracts and approval workflows.
The strategic alternative
Concord has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.
Quick SCIM facts
| SCIM available? | No |
| SCIM tier required | N/A |
| SSO required first? | No |
| SSO available? | Yes |
| SSO protocol | SSO (details not specified) |
| Documentation | Not available |
Supported identity providers
| IdP | SSO | SCIM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta | Via third-party | ❌ | SSO mentioned in security features. No OIN listing or SCIM provisioning documented. |
| Microsoft Entra ID | Via third-party | ❌ | SSO available but configuration details limited. Contact vendor for enterprise features. |
| Google Workspace | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
| OneLogin | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
The cost of not automating
Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Concord accounts manually. Here's what that costs:
The Concord pricing problem
Concord gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.
Tier comparison
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essentials | $399-$499/month + $39-$49/user | ||
| Business | $699/month + $54/user | ||
| Enterprise | Custom pricing |
Pricing structure
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essentials | $399-$499/month + $39-$49/user | ||
| Business | $699/month + $54/user | ||
| Enterprise | Custom pricing |
What this means in practice
Without SCIM provisioning, IT administrators must manually create, modify, and deactivate user accounts in Concord. For a contract management system where users need different permission levels based on their role (legal approval authority, procurement access, sales contract creation), this creates several problems:
Additional constraints
Summary of challenges
- Concord does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
- Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
- Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually
What Concord actually offers for identity
SAML SSO (Plan unclear)
Concord mentions SSO in their security documentation but provides minimal implementation details:
| Setting | Details |
|---|---|
| Protocol | SAML (specifics not documented) |
| Supported IdPs | Not specified publicly |
| Configuration | Contact vendor for setup details |
| JIT provisioning | Not documented |
Critical gap: Concord's public documentation doesn't specify which plan includes SSO or provide configuration guidance. Their security page mentions "SSO and MFA" as features but requires contacting sales for specifics.
SCIM Provisioning
| Feature | Supported? |
|---|---|
| Create users | ❌ No native SCIM documented |
| Update users | ❌ No native SCIM documented |
| Deactivate users | ❌ No native SCIM documented |
| Group mapping | ❌ No native SCIM documented |
The reality for IT teams
Concord positions itself as an enterprise contract lifecycle management platform with security features, but their identity management offerings are poorly documented. The $399-699/month pricing suggests enterprise-grade capabilities, yet basic SSO implementation details aren't publicly available.
For legal and procurement teams managing contract access, this creates a procurement bottleneck—you'll need custom calls with Concord's sales team to understand what identity features exist and at what cost.
What IT admins are saying
Concord's limited provisioning documentation leaves IT teams in the dark:
- No public SCIM documentation or implementation guides
- SSO configuration details require contacting sales
- Unclear which features are available at different pricing tiers
- Manual user management necessary for contract access controls
Limited public documentation on SSO/SCIM
Contact vendor for enterprise features
The recurring theme
IT teams can't evaluate Concord's provisioning capabilities without entering a sales process, and once implemented, user management appears to require manual intervention for a platform handling sensitive contract data.
The decision
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Small legal team (<10 users) with basic contract needs | Manual management is acceptable |
| Growing legal department with frequent contract staff changes | Use Stitchflow: automation essential for role-based access |
| Enterprise legal team (25+ users) across multiple departments | Use Stitchflow: automation essential for compliance and audit trail |
| Multi-entity organization with complex signature authority workflows | Use Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended |
| Companies requiring detailed provisioning documentation for compliance | Use Stitchflow: Concord lacks detailed SCIM/provisioning documentation |
The bottom line
Concord is a solid contract lifecycle management platform, but it lacks documented SCIM provisioning capabilities despite serving legal teams that need strict access controls. For organizations that require automated user provisioning with proper audit trails for contract management access, Stitchflow provides the missing automation layer.
Make Concord workflows AI-native
Concord has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.
Technical specifications
SCIM Version
Not specifiedSupported Operations
Not specifiedSupported Attributes
Plan requirement
Not specifiedPrerequisites
Not specifiedKey limitations
- SCIM provisioning not documented
- SSO available but details limited
- Contact vendor for enterprise features
Documentation not available.
Unlock SCIM for
Concord
Concord has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.
See how it works


