Stitchflow
Cube logo

Cube SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Cube user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Cube, the semantic layer platform for data teams, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Enterprise customers get SAML 2.0 and LDAP authentication plus role-based access control (RBAC), user provisioning remains entirely manual. For data infrastructure platforms where access control determines who can query which data models and deployments, this creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing multi-tenant analytics environments.

The gap between SSO authentication and automated provisioning is particularly problematic for Cube deployments. Data teams frequently need access provisioned and deprovisioned as projects shift, analysts join different business units, or contractors cycle through engagements. Manual user management in a platform that serves as the central data access layer creates both security risks (lingering access to sensitive data models) and productivity bottlenecks (delays in granting analysts access to new datasets).

The strategic alternative

Cube has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0, LDAP
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaVia third-partySSO via Okta on Premium plan. SCIM provisioning not documented. Enterprise adds SAML/LDAP and RBAC.
Microsoft Entra IDVia third-partyNo Entra ID-specific documentation. SAML SSO configurable on Enterprise tier.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Cube accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Cube pricing problem

Cube gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Starter$0.15 per CCU
Premium$0.30 per CCU
EnterpriseCustom CCU pricing

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Starter$0.15 per CCU
Premium$0.30 per CCU
EnterpriseCustom CCU pricing

CCU = Cube Consumption Units (usage-based pricing model)

What this means in practice

Without SCIM, your data teams face significant user management overhead:

Manual provisioning
Every new data engineer, analyst, or developer needs manual account setup
No automated deprovisioning
When team members leave, their Cube access must be manually revoked
JIT limitations
While Enterprise supports JIT provisioning through SAML, you can't pre-provision users or manage role assignments programmatically
Multi-tenant complexity
Data teams often run multiple Cube deployments (dev/staging/prod) requiring separate user management

For a 50-person data organization, this translates to roughly 8-12 hours monthly of manual user administration work.

Additional constraints

Enterprise tier required for SSO
Basic authentication and OAuth (Google/GitHub) are available on lower tiers, but SAML/LDAP requires custom Enterprise pricing
No role-based automation
Cube's RBAC features exist on Enterprise, but can't be automated through SCIM - all role assignments require manual configuration
Data model access gaps
Without automated provisioning, it's difficult to ensure consistent access controls across Cube's semantic layer configurations
Usage-based cost uncertainty
CCU pricing makes it harder to budget for user growth, especially without automated lifecycle management

Summary of challenges

  • Cube does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Cube actually offers for identity

SAML SSO & LDAP (Enterprise only)

Cube supports enterprise identity integration, but only at the highest tier:

FeatureSupport Level
SAML 2.0Enterprise tier only
LDAPEnterprise tier only
JIT provisioning✓ Yes (with SAML/LDAP)
Google OAuthAll tiers
GitHub OAuthAll tiers
Password authAll tiers (can be disabled)

The reality: Cube's identity features are limited to authentication. There's no SCIM provisioning documented anywhere in their platform.

What Enterprise gets you

SAML 2.0 integration with custom IdP configuration
LDAP connectivity for Active Directory environments
Role-based access control (RBAC) for data model permissions
JIT user creation when users first authenticate
99.99% uptime SLA and dedicated customer success manager

Okta Integration Status

The Okta Integration Network listing for Cube shows:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes (Enterprise)
User provisioning❌ No
Group sync❌ No
Automated deprovisioning❌ No

Translation: You get single sign-on authentication, but all user lifecycle management remains manual. Data engineers and analysts must still be added to workspaces and assigned data model permissions through Cube's interface.

Why this matters for data teams: Cube handles analytics infrastructure, but without SCIM, you're manually managing user access to data models and pre-aggregations. For organizations with frequent analyst turnover or complex data governance requirements, this creates ongoing administrative overhead.

What IT admins are saying

Cube's lack of automated provisioning forces IT teams into manual workflows for their analytics infrastructure:

  • No SCIM provisioning documented - all user management is manual
  • Enterprise tier required for basic SAML/LDAP authentication
  • JIT provisioning available but doesn't solve offboarding challenges
  • Data model access controls must be managed separately from identity systems

SCIM not available

Community feedback on Cube's provisioning limitations

The recurring theme

Data teams get powerful semantic layer capabilities, but IT teams are stuck with manual user lifecycle management. When analysts and data engineers join or leave, their Cube access requires separate provisioning steps outside your identity provider workflows.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small data team (<10 analysts)Manual management with Enterprise SSO acceptable
Development/testing environmentsUse free tier with Google/GitHub OAuth
Growing analytics teams (20+ users)Use Stitchflow: no SCIM means manual provisioning overhead
Multi-tenant Cube deploymentsUse Stitchflow: essential for managing access across instances
Enterprise with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automation essential for audit trail and RBAC

The bottom line

Cube provides excellent semantic layer capabilities but offers no SCIM provisioning—only SAML/LDAP SSO on Enterprise plans with custom CCU pricing. For data teams that need automated user lifecycle management across Cube instances, Stitchflow eliminates the manual provisioning bottleneck entirely.

Make Cube workflows AI-native

Cube has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

SCIM provisioning not documentedSAML 2.0 and LDAP on Enterprise onlyBasic auth (password, Google, GitHub) available on all tiers

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • SCIM provisioning not documented
  • SAML 2.0 and LDAP on Enterprise only
  • Basic auth (password, Google, GitHub) available on all tiers

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Cube → Sign On

SSO via Okta on Premium plan. SCIM provisioning not documented. Enterprise adds SAML/LDAP and RBAC.

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
Cube

Cube has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Cube logo
Cube
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide