Stitchflow
Cyberhaven logo

Cyberhaven SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Cyberhaven user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM not available

Summary and recommendation

Cyberhaven, the data protection platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Cyberhaven offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not user lifecycle management. IT teams must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Cyberhaven's admin console, even though the platform costs $30-48K annually. This manual approach creates operational overhead and introduces security gaps when employees change roles or leave the organization.

The absence of automated provisioning is particularly problematic for security-focused organizations using Cyberhaven for data loss prevention. Without SCIM integration, there's a risk that terminated employees retain access to sensitive data monitoring tools, and new hires may experience delays in getting proper security coverage. For a platform designed to prevent data breaches, the lack of automated access controls creates an ironic vulnerability.

The strategic alternative

Cyberhaven has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaNo Okta OIN app. Cyberhaven supports SAML 2.0 SSO via custom SAML app configuration.
Microsoft Entra IDCyberhaven supports SAML 2.0, OAuth2.0 (Google SSO), and password-based auth with 2FA. No automated provisioning.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Cyberhaven accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Cyberhaven pricing problem

Cyberhaven gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
ProNot disclosed
BusinessNot disclosed
EnterpriseCustom (~$30-48K/year median)

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSCIM
ProNot disclosed
BusinessNot disclosed
EnterpriseCustom (~$30-48K/year median)

What this means in practice

Without automated provisioning, IT teams face several operational challenges:

Manual account lifecycle management: Every new hire, role change, and departure requires manual intervention in Cyberhaven's admin console. For organizations with regular headcount changes, this creates ongoing administrative overhead.

Policy enforcement gaps: Cyberhaven integrates with directory services for user group-based policies, but these policies only apply after users are manually created and properly assigned. The delay between directory updates and Cyberhaven access creates potential security gaps.

Audit trail complexity: Manual provisioning makes it difficult to maintain clean audit logs showing when users gained or lost access, complicating compliance reporting.

Additional constraints

Directory service dependency
While Cyberhaven can read user groups from directory services, it cannot automatically create accounts based on group membership
SAML-only SSO
Authentication is limited to SAML 2.0 or Google OAuth, with no modern OIDC support
Enterprise pricing barrier
All SSO functionality requires expensive Enterprise contracts, making it cost-prohibitive for smaller organizations
No API documentation
Cyberhaven doesn't publish user management APIs, limiting custom automation options

Summary of challenges

  • Cyberhaven does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Cyberhaven actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Enterprise plan)

Cyberhaven supports federated authentication through SAML 2.0:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0, OAuth 2.0 (Google)
Supported IdPsCustom SAML configuration (Okta, Entra, etc.)
ConfigurationManual SAML setup via identity provider
User requirementManual account creation required
MFA supportPassword-based auth with 2FA available

Critical limitation: No automated user provisioning. IT teams must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Cyberhaven's admin console.

Okta Integration (No OIN listing)

Cyberhaven has no official Okta Integration Network app:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes (custom SAML app)
OIDC SSO❌ No
Create users❌ No
Update users❌ No
Deactivate users❌ No
Group sync❌ No

Entra ID Integration

Similar manual configuration required:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes (custom SAML app)
Create users❌ No
Update users❌ No
Deactivate users❌ No
Group sync❌ No

The reality: With enterprise pricing starting around $30-48K annually, you're paying premium rates but still managing user accounts manually. Directory service integration exists for policy enforcement, but provides no automated lifecycle management.

What IT admins are saying

Cyberhaven's lack of automated provisioning creates manual overhead for IT teams managing enterprise security platforms:

  • Manual user creation required even with SSO configured
  • No automated deprovisioning when employees leave
  • Directory service integration limited to policy application, not user lifecycle
  • High enterprise pricing barrier with no mid-market provisioning options

Even with SAML SSO working, we still have to manually create every user account in Cyberhaven before they can access the platform. It's not true automated provisioning.

IT Director, Reddit r/sysadmin

The lack of SCIM means we're constantly playing catch-up on user management. When someone leaves, we have to remember to disable their Cyberhaven access separately from everything else.

Security Administrator, Spiceworks Community

The recurring theme

Cyberhaven forces IT teams into manual user lifecycle management despite its enterprise positioning, creating security gaps and administrative burden that scales poorly with organization size.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small security team (<20 users) with stable headcountManual management acceptable given enterprise-only pricing
Growing organization (50+ users) needing data protectionUse Stitchflow: automation essential for scale
Enterprise with compliance requirements (SOX, GDPR, HIPAA)Use Stitchflow: automated provisioning critical for audit trail
Multi-department deployment with frequent role changesUse Stitchflow: manual management becomes unmanageable
Cost-conscious organizations evaluating data protection toolsConsider alternatives with native SCIM before committing to Cyberhaven

The bottom line

Cyberhaven delivers enterprise-grade data protection at enterprise prices (~$30-48K annually), but offers zero provisioning automation despite the hefty investment. For organizations already committed to Cyberhaven's data loss prevention capabilities, Stitchflow provides the missing identity management automation without requiring platform migration.

Make Cyberhaven workflows AI-native

Cyberhaven has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No SCIM provisioning supportSSO via SAML 2.0 or Google OAuthIntegrates with directory services for user group-based policiesManual user management requiredEnterprise-only pricing

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No SCIM provisioning support
  • SSO via SAML 2.0 or Google OAuth
  • Integrates with directory services for user group-based policies
  • Manual user management required
  • Enterprise-only pricing

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Cyberhaven

Cyberhaven has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Cyberhaven logo
Cyberhaven
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Abnormal Security logo

Abnormal Security

No SCIM

Security / Email Security

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Abnormal Security, the AI-powered email security platform protecting against BEC and phishing attacks, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the platform supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not automated user lifecycle management. Security teams must manually provision and deprovision analyst access through Abnormal's portal, creating operational overhead and potential security gaps in a platform specifically designed to protect against email-based threats. This manual provisioning model creates significant challenges for security operations. When new SOC analysts join or existing team members change roles, IT admins must coordinate manual account creation and permission updates in Abnormal Security. For a platform that's critical to threat detection and incident response, delays in provisioning can leave security gaps, while delayed deprovisioning creates compliance risks. The irony is stark: a security platform designed to prevent account takeover and credential abuse lacks the automated provisioning controls that prevent exactly these risks.

View full guide
Airwallex logo

Airwallex

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Airwallex, the global payments and treasury platform, offers no SCIM provisioning support on any plan, including their custom Accelerate enterprise tier. Despite being positioned for enterprise use with features like multi-entity management and advanced treasury controls, Airwallex lacks any official identity provider integrations—no SSO, no provisioning, and no presence in major IdP galleries like Okta's OIN or Microsoft Entra. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing financial access across growing organizations, where manual user provisioning and deprovisioning in a payments platform presents both efficiency and security risks. The absence of identity management capabilities means IT administrators must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Airwallex—a particularly concerning gap given that this platform handles sensitive financial operations, cross-border payments, and treasury management. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees could retain access to financial systems, creating compliance risks and potential security vulnerabilities that most finance and IT teams cannot afford to overlook.

View full guide
Alkami logo

Alkami

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alkami, the digital banking platform used by banks and credit unions, does not offer SCIM provisioning or public SSO integrations. As an enterprise-only platform with custom pricing, Alkami appears to handle user management through direct account administration rather than standardized identity protocols. This creates significant challenges for financial institutions that need to integrate Alkami with their existing identity infrastructure—particularly problematic given the compliance requirements and security standards that banks must maintain. The lack of automated provisioning means IT teams at financial institutions must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Alkami. For a platform handling sensitive financial data and customer information, this manual approach introduces compliance risks and operational overhead. Banks typically require seamless integration between their core identity systems and all applications accessing customer data.

View full guide