Summary and recommendation
Cyberhaven, the data protection platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Cyberhaven offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not user lifecycle management. IT teams must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Cyberhaven's admin console, even though the platform costs $30-48K annually. This manual approach creates operational overhead and introduces security gaps when employees change roles or leave the organization.
The absence of automated provisioning is particularly problematic for security-focused organizations using Cyberhaven for data loss prevention. Without SCIM integration, there's a risk that terminated employees retain access to sensitive data monitoring tools, and new hires may experience delays in getting proper security coverage. For a platform designed to prevent data breaches, the lack of automated access controls creates an ironic vulnerability.
The strategic alternative
Cyberhaven has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.
Quick SCIM facts
| SCIM available? | No |
| SCIM tier required | N/A |
| SSO required first? | No |
| SSO available? | Yes |
| SSO protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Documentation | Not available |
Supported identity providers
| IdP | SSO | SCIM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta | ✓ | ❌ | No Okta OIN app. Cyberhaven supports SAML 2.0 SSO via custom SAML app configuration. |
| Microsoft Entra ID | ✓ | ❌ | Cyberhaven supports SAML 2.0, OAuth2.0 (Google SSO), and password-based auth with 2FA. No automated provisioning. |
| Google Workspace | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
| OneLogin | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
The cost of not automating
Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Cyberhaven accounts manually. Here's what that costs:
The Cyberhaven pricing problem
Cyberhaven gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.
Tier comparison
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro | Not disclosed | ||
| Business | Not disclosed | ||
| Enterprise | Custom (~$30-48K/year median) |
Pricing structure
| Plan | Price | SCIM |
|---|---|---|
| Pro | Not disclosed | ❌ |
| Business | Not disclosed | ❌ |
| Enterprise | Custom (~$30-48K/year median) | ❌ |
What this means in practice
Without automated provisioning, IT teams face several operational challenges:
Manual account lifecycle management: Every new hire, role change, and departure requires manual intervention in Cyberhaven's admin console. For organizations with regular headcount changes, this creates ongoing administrative overhead.
Policy enforcement gaps: Cyberhaven integrates with directory services for user group-based policies, but these policies only apply after users are manually created and properly assigned. The delay between directory updates and Cyberhaven access creates potential security gaps.
Audit trail complexity: Manual provisioning makes it difficult to maintain clean audit logs showing when users gained or lost access, complicating compliance reporting.
Additional constraints
Summary of challenges
- Cyberhaven does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
- Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
- Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually
What Cyberhaven actually offers for identity
SAML SSO (Enterprise plan)
Cyberhaven supports federated authentication through SAML 2.0:
| Setting | Details |
|---|---|
| Protocol | SAML 2.0, OAuth 2.0 (Google) |
| Supported IdPs | Custom SAML configuration (Okta, Entra, etc.) |
| Configuration | Manual SAML setup via identity provider |
| User requirement | Manual account creation required |
| MFA support | Password-based auth with 2FA available |
Critical limitation: No automated user provisioning. IT teams must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Cyberhaven's admin console.
Okta Integration (No OIN listing)
Cyberhaven has no official Okta Integration Network app:
| Feature | Supported? |
|---|---|
| SAML SSO | ✓ Yes (custom SAML app) |
| OIDC SSO | ❌ No |
| Create users | ❌ No |
| Update users | ❌ No |
| Deactivate users | ❌ No |
| Group sync | ❌ No |
Entra ID Integration
Similar manual configuration required:
| Feature | Supported? |
|---|---|
| SAML SSO | ✓ Yes (custom SAML app) |
| Create users | ❌ No |
| Update users | ❌ No |
| Deactivate users | ❌ No |
| Group sync | ❌ No |
The reality: With enterprise pricing starting around $30-48K annually, you're paying premium rates but still managing user accounts manually. Directory service integration exists for policy enforcement, but provides no automated lifecycle management.
What IT admins are saying
Cyberhaven's lack of automated provisioning creates manual overhead for IT teams managing enterprise security platforms:
- Manual user creation required even with SSO configured
- No automated deprovisioning when employees leave
- Directory service integration limited to policy application, not user lifecycle
- High enterprise pricing barrier with no mid-market provisioning options
Even with SAML SSO working, we still have to manually create every user account in Cyberhaven before they can access the platform. It's not true automated provisioning.
The lack of SCIM means we're constantly playing catch-up on user management. When someone leaves, we have to remember to disable their Cyberhaven access separately from everything else.
The recurring theme
Cyberhaven forces IT teams into manual user lifecycle management despite its enterprise positioning, creating security gaps and administrative burden that scales poorly with organization size.
The decision
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Small security team (<20 users) with stable headcount | Manual management acceptable given enterprise-only pricing |
| Growing organization (50+ users) needing data protection | Use Stitchflow: automation essential for scale |
| Enterprise with compliance requirements (SOX, GDPR, HIPAA) | Use Stitchflow: automated provisioning critical for audit trail |
| Multi-department deployment with frequent role changes | Use Stitchflow: manual management becomes unmanageable |
| Cost-conscious organizations evaluating data protection tools | Consider alternatives with native SCIM before committing to Cyberhaven |
The bottom line
Cyberhaven delivers enterprise-grade data protection at enterprise prices (~$30-48K annually), but offers zero provisioning automation despite the hefty investment. For organizations already committed to Cyberhaven's data loss prevention capabilities, Stitchflow provides the missing identity management automation without requiring platform migration.
Make Cyberhaven workflows AI-native
Cyberhaven has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.
Technical specifications
SCIM Version
Not specifiedSupported Operations
Not specifiedSupported Attributes
Plan requirement
Not specifiedPrerequisites
Not specifiedKey limitations
- No SCIM provisioning support
- SSO via SAML 2.0 or Google OAuth
- Integrates with directory services for user group-based policies
- Manual user management required
- Enterprise-only pricing
Documentation not available.
Unlock SCIM for
Cyberhaven
Cyberhaven has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.
See how it works


