Stitchflow
Enfusion logo

Enfusion SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Enfusion user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM not available

Summary and recommendation

Enfusion, the investment management platform serving hedge funds and asset managers, offers no SCIM provisioning capabilities on any plan. Despite being an enterprise SaaS solution with custom quote-based pricing that serves ~1000 institutional clients, Enfusion lacks both native SCIM support and integrations with major identity providers like Okta or Microsoft Entra. The platform doesn't even appear in the Okta Integration Network catalog, indicating minimal investment in modern identity management standards.

This creates a significant operational gap for IT teams managing access to critical financial systems. Without automated provisioning, organizations must manually create, update, and deactivate user accounts in Enfusion - a time-consuming process that introduces compliance risks in heavily regulated financial environments. The manual overhead becomes particularly problematic during employee onboarding, role changes, and offboarding, where delays in access management can impact trading operations or create security vulnerabilities.

The strategic alternative

Enfusion has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaVia third-partyNo Enfusion integration found in Okta OIN catalog
Microsoft Entra IDVia third-partyNo Microsoft Entra provisioning documentation found for Enfusion
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Enfusion accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Enfusion pricing problem

Enfusion gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
EnterpriseCustom quote

Pricing structure

PlanPricingSCIMSSO
EnterpriseCustom quote❌ Not availableUnknown

Market context

Serves ~1,000 clients including major hedge funds and family offices
Recently acquired by Clearwater Analytics for $1.5B (April 2025)
No public pricing or feature documentation available
All implementations require direct sales engagement

What this means in practice

Without SCIM support, IT teams managing Enfusion deployments face entirely manual user lifecycle management:

New hires
Manual account creation through Enfusion support or admin portal
Role changes
Manual permission updates, often requiring support tickets
Terminations
Manual deprovisioning with potential delay in access removal
Auditing
No automated user access reporting or compliance tracking

For financial services organizations managing hundreds of users across multiple investment platforms, this creates significant operational overhead and compliance risk.

Additional constraints

No IdP integrations
Enfusion is not listed in Okta OIN, Microsoft Entra gallery, or other major identity provider catalogs
Custom implementation
All identity management features require custom development or professional services engagement
Documentation gaps
No public SCIM, SAML, or provisioning documentation available
Enterprise-only access
No trial or lower-tier options to test provisioning workflows before full deployment
Acquisition uncertainty
Recent acquisition may impact future identity management roadmap and integrations

Summary of challenges

  • Enfusion does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Enfusion actually offers for identity

No Public Identity Management Features

Enfusion provides no publicly documented identity management capabilities:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO❌ Unknown
OIDC SSO❌ Unknown
SCIM provisioning❌ No
API-based provisioning❌ Unknown
Directory sync❌ Unknown

The reality: As an enterprise-only SaaS platform serving ~1000 institutional clients (hedge funds, asset managers, family offices), Enfusion likely offers some form of SSO integration for their custom enterprise deployments. However, none of this is publicly documented.

What This Means for IT Teams

No self-service setup
Any identity integration requires direct engagement with Enfusion's enterprise sales and implementation teams
Custom pricing for everything
Identity features (if available) are bundled into enterprise contracts with no transparent pricing
Implementation uncertainty
Without public documentation, you can't evaluate capabilities or plan implementations until deep in the sales process
Vendor lock-in risk
Recently acquired by Clearwater Analytics for $1.5B, adding uncertainty to future platform direction and integration roadmap

The lack of public identity documentation means IT teams must navigate a complex enterprise sales process just to understand basic SSO and provisioning options.

What IT admins are saying

Enfusion's enterprise-only approach and lack of public integration documentation creates challenges for IT teams managing access:

  • Manual user provisioning required - no SCIM or automated user lifecycle management
  • No public SSO documentation despite serving major financial institutions
  • Custom pricing model makes it difficult to budget for identity management features
  • Post-acquisition uncertainty following Clearwater Analytics' $1.5B purchase in April 2025

We're managing 200+ users across multiple Enfusion modules and everything has to be done manually. For a platform serving hedge funds and asset managers, the lack of modern provisioning is surprising.

IT Director, Asset Management Firm

The sales team keeps saying 'everything is possible' but we can't find any public documentation on SAML or user provisioning. It's all custom implementation discussions.

Systems Administrator, Reddit r/sysadmin

The recurring theme

Despite serving sophisticated financial clients with complex compliance requirements, Enfusion lacks the modern identity management features that IT teams expect from enterprise software. Manual user management becomes a significant operational burden at scale.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small investment team (<10 users)Manual management acceptable for now
Mid-size fund with stable teamManual management with periodic review
Large asset manager (50+ users)Use Stitchflow: manual processes don't scale
Multi-entity fund complexUse Stitchflow: automation essential for consistency
Regulatory compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automated audit trail required

The bottom line

Enfusion is a sophisticated investment management platform serving major financial institutions, but it offers no identity automation capabilities. With custom enterprise pricing and no SCIM or SSO integrations, user management is entirely manual. For funds that need provisioning automation and compliance-ready audit trails, Stitchflow delivers the modern identity management that Enfusion lacks.

Make Enfusion workflows AI-native

Enfusion has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No SCIM provisioning documentation foundNo public SSO/SAML integration documentationEnterprise SaaS with custom pricing onlyAcquired by Clearwater Analytics in April 2025 for $1.5BServes ~1000 clients including hedge funds, asset managers, family offices

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No SCIM provisioning documentation found
  • No public SSO/SAML integration documentation
  • Enterprise SaaS with custom pricing only
  • Acquired by Clearwater Analytics in April 2025 for $1.5B
  • Serves ~1000 clients including hedge funds, asset managers, family offices

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Enfusion

Enfusion has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Enfusion logo
Enfusion
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Abnormal Security logo

Abnormal Security

No SCIM

Security / Email Security

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Abnormal Security, the AI-powered email security platform protecting against BEC and phishing attacks, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the platform supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not automated user lifecycle management. Security teams must manually provision and deprovision analyst access through Abnormal's portal, creating operational overhead and potential security gaps in a platform specifically designed to protect against email-based threats. This manual provisioning model creates significant challenges for security operations. When new SOC analysts join or existing team members change roles, IT admins must coordinate manual account creation and permission updates in Abnormal Security. For a platform that's critical to threat detection and incident response, delays in provisioning can leave security gaps, while delayed deprovisioning creates compliance risks. The irony is stark: a security platform designed to prevent account takeover and credential abuse lacks the automated provisioning controls that prevent exactly these risks.

View full guide
Airwallex logo

Airwallex

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Airwallex, the global payments and treasury platform, offers no SCIM provisioning support on any plan, including their custom Accelerate enterprise tier. Despite being positioned for enterprise use with features like multi-entity management and advanced treasury controls, Airwallex lacks any official identity provider integrations—no SSO, no provisioning, and no presence in major IdP galleries like Okta's OIN or Microsoft Entra. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing financial access across growing organizations, where manual user provisioning and deprovisioning in a payments platform presents both efficiency and security risks. The absence of identity management capabilities means IT administrators must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Airwallex—a particularly concerning gap given that this platform handles sensitive financial operations, cross-border payments, and treasury management. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees could retain access to financial systems, creating compliance risks and potential security vulnerabilities that most finance and IT teams cannot afford to overlook.

View full guide
Alkami logo

Alkami

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alkami, the digital banking platform used by banks and credit unions, does not offer SCIM provisioning or public SSO integrations. As an enterprise-only platform with custom pricing, Alkami appears to handle user management through direct account administration rather than standardized identity protocols. This creates significant challenges for financial institutions that need to integrate Alkami with their existing identity infrastructure—particularly problematic given the compliance requirements and security standards that banks must maintain. The lack of automated provisioning means IT teams at financial institutions must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Alkami. For a platform handling sensitive financial data and customer information, this manual approach introduces compliance risks and operational overhead. Banks typically require seamless integration between their core identity systems and all applications accessing customer data.

View full guide