Stitchflow
Filevine logo

Filevine SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Filevine user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Filevine, the legal practice management platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Filevine offers SAML-based SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Azure AD, this only handles authentication through custom configuration—there's no pre-built connector in either the Okta Integration Network or Azure AD Gallery. User provisioning relies on just-in-time (JIT) creation, meaning accounts are only created when users first attempt to log in, leaving IT teams with no proactive control over user lifecycle management.

This creates a significant operational gap for legal firms managing dozens or hundreds of attorneys, paralegals, and support staff. Without proper provisioning, departing employees retain access until someone manually removes them from Filevine, creating compliance risks in an industry where client confidentiality and data security are paramount. IT teams are forced into reactive user management, discovering access issues only after security incidents or failed audits.

The strategic alternative

Filevine has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaNo OIN connector. SSO available via SAML with Okta as IdP.
Microsoft Entra IDSSO via SAML. Azure AD supported as IdP.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Filevine accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Filevine pricing problem

Filevine gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Standard~$39/user/mo
Enterprise~$79/user/mo

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Standard~$39/user/mo
Enterprise~$79/user/mo

Pricing transparency issues

No public pricing
all costs require sales contact
Standard vs Enterprise distinctions unclear
Implementation and configuration costs unknown

What this means in practice

Manual provisioning at scale becomes expensive

50 users
~$117,000/year in licensing costs alone, plus manual onboarding overhead
200 users
~$468,000/year with significant IT administration burden
Every user addition/removal requires manual Filevine admin panel work

JIT provisioning creates security gaps

Users can't access Filevine until after first SSO login
No way to pre-provision accounts or set permissions
Deprovisioning requires manual account disabling in Filevine

Additional constraints

No OIN or Gallery connectors
Custom SAML configuration required for both Okta and Entra ID
Quote-based pricing opacity
Budget planning difficult without understanding true costs
Legal-specific compliance requirements
Manual user management creates audit trail gaps
No API documentation
Third-party automation tools can't integrate reliably
Attorney-client privilege concerns
Delayed deprovisioning poses data access risks

Summary of challenges

  • Filevine does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Filevine actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Plan unknown)

Filevine supports SAML 2.0 integration with third-party identity providers:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Entra ID, other SAML providers
ConfigurationCustom SAML setup required
User requirementJIT provisioning creates users on first login
DocumentationNo public configuration guides available

Critical limitation: Filevine has no Okta OIN connector or Entra gallery app, requiring manual SAML configuration for every deployment. Pricing for SSO capability is not disclosed publicly.

No Okta or Entra Integration

Despite being a major legal practice management platform, Filevine has no official integrations:

FeatureSupported?
Okta OIN connector❌ No
Entra gallery app❌ No
SAML SSO✓ Yes (custom config)
SCIM provisioning❌ No
Create users✓ Yes (JIT only)
Update users❌ No
Deactivate users❌ No
Group sync❌ No

Translation: You get basic SSO through custom SAML configuration, but no automated user lifecycle management. JIT provisioning means users are created when they first log in, but there's no way to update user attributes, assign roles, or deactivate accounts through your IdP.

The real problem: Legal firms need strict user access controls and audit trails. Without SCIM provisioning, you're manually managing user accounts in another system, creating compliance gaps and administrative overhead that defeats the purpose of centralized identity management.

What IT admins are saying

Filevine's lack of automated provisioning creates ongoing friction for IT teams managing legal practices:

  • Manual user onboarding slows down attorney and staff productivity on day one
  • No visibility into who has access without logging into Filevine directly
  • Deprovisioning requires remembering to manually disable accounts in yet another system
  • SSO setup requires custom SAML configuration without pre-built connectors

JIT provisioning creates users on first login, but you still need to manually assign roles and permissions in Filevine after the fact.

IT Director, Mid-size Law Firm

We have SSO working but it's basically just a fancy login screen - we still have to create every user account manually and remember to delete them when people leave.

Systems Administrator, Legal Services

The recurring theme

Even with SSO configured, Filevine operates as an island - IT teams must manually manage the full user lifecycle separately from their identity provider, creating security gaps and administrative overhead.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small law firm (<10 attorneys)Manual management is workable with SAML SSO
Growing practice with frequent staff changesUse Stitchflow: automation prevents access gaps
Multi-location firm (20+ users)Use Stitchflow: automation essential for consistency
Enterprise legal department with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automation critical for audit trail
Firms using multiple legal tech toolsUse Stitchflow: standardize provisioning across all apps

The bottom line

Filevine offers robust case management capabilities but provides no user provisioning automation—even basic SAML SSO requires custom configuration and manual user creation. For legal practices that need reliable, auditable user lifecycle management without IT overhead, Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning that works with any Filevine plan.

Make Filevine workflows AI-native

Filevine has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No native SCIM endpoint documentedNo Okta OIN or Entra gallery connectorSSO via SAML only - requires custom configurationJIT provisioning creates users on first loginPricing not publicly disclosed - requires sales contact

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No native SCIM endpoint documented
  • No Okta OIN or Entra gallery connector
  • SSO via SAML only - requires custom configuration
  • JIT provisioning creates users on first login
  • Pricing not publicly disclosed - requires sales contact

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Filevine

Filevine has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Filevine logo
Filevine
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Abnormal Security logo

Abnormal Security

No SCIM

Security / Email Security

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Abnormal Security, the AI-powered email security platform protecting against BEC and phishing attacks, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the platform supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not automated user lifecycle management. Security teams must manually provision and deprovision analyst access through Abnormal's portal, creating operational overhead and potential security gaps in a platform specifically designed to protect against email-based threats. This manual provisioning model creates significant challenges for security operations. When new SOC analysts join or existing team members change roles, IT admins must coordinate manual account creation and permission updates in Abnormal Security. For a platform that's critical to threat detection and incident response, delays in provisioning can leave security gaps, while delayed deprovisioning creates compliance risks. The irony is stark: a security platform designed to prevent account takeover and credential abuse lacks the automated provisioning controls that prevent exactly these risks.

View full guide
Airwallex logo

Airwallex

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Airwallex, the global payments and treasury platform, offers no SCIM provisioning support on any plan, including their custom Accelerate enterprise tier. Despite being positioned for enterprise use with features like multi-entity management and advanced treasury controls, Airwallex lacks any official identity provider integrations—no SSO, no provisioning, and no presence in major IdP galleries like Okta's OIN or Microsoft Entra. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing financial access across growing organizations, where manual user provisioning and deprovisioning in a payments platform presents both efficiency and security risks. The absence of identity management capabilities means IT administrators must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Airwallex—a particularly concerning gap given that this platform handles sensitive financial operations, cross-border payments, and treasury management. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees could retain access to financial systems, creating compliance risks and potential security vulnerabilities that most finance and IT teams cannot afford to overlook.

View full guide
Alkami logo

Alkami

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alkami, the digital banking platform used by banks and credit unions, does not offer SCIM provisioning or public SSO integrations. As an enterprise-only platform with custom pricing, Alkami appears to handle user management through direct account administration rather than standardized identity protocols. This creates significant challenges for financial institutions that need to integrate Alkami with their existing identity infrastructure—particularly problematic given the compliance requirements and security standards that banks must maintain. The lack of automated provisioning means IT teams at financial institutions must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Alkami. For a platform handling sensitive financial data and customer information, this manual approach introduces compliance risks and operational overhead. Banks typically require seamless integration between their core identity systems and all applications accessing customer data.

View full guide