Stitchflow
HaloPSA logo

HaloPSA SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate HaloPSA user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

HaloPSA, the MSP-focused PSA/ITSM platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan, despite charging $90/agent/month annually. While HaloPSA offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration with Azure AD and WatchGuard AuthPoint, this only handles authentication—not user lifecycle management. IT teams must manually create, update, and deactivate user accounts in HaloPSA, or rely on custom API integrations to automate provisioning workflows.

For managed service providers managing dozens of technicians and support staff, this creates significant operational overhead. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees retain access to client data and service tickets until manually removed—a serious compliance and security risk in the MSP industry. The lack of SCIM also makes onboarding new technicians slower, as IT admins must provision accounts across multiple systems manually rather than through their identity provider's standard workflows.

The strategic alternative

HaloPSA has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaVia third-partyNo Okta OIN integration found. SAML SSO can be configured manually.
Microsoft Entra IDVia third-partyAzure AD SSO via SAML. Users can be deactivated in HaloPSA when not found in Azure (via Halo Integrator). Multi-tenant Azure support available.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages HaloPSA accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The HaloPSA pricing problem

HaloPSA gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Standard$90/agent/month
Enterprise~$13,500/year (5+ agents)

Provisioning options

PlanPricingSSOSCIM
Standard$90/agent/month✓ SAML 2.0❌ Not available
Enterprise~$13,500/year (5+ agents)✓ SAML 2.0❌ Not available

Key limitation: No plan includes automated user provisioning. HaloPSA relies on manual account creation or custom API workflows.

What this means in practice

For MSP environments: HaloPSA serves managed service providers who frequently onboard/offboard technicians and contractors. Without SCIM:

New technician onboarding
IT must manually create HaloPSA accounts after SSO setup
Role changes
Service desk promotions require manual permission updates in HaloPSA
Contractor departures
No automated deprovisioning creates security gaps

User lifecycle gaps

SSO enables login but doesn't create the underlying HaloPSA user account
Deactivated IdP accounts can still access HaloPSA until manually disabled
No automated role synchronization between IdP groups and HaloPSA permissions

Additional constraints

Manual dependency
Every user change requires HaloPSA admin intervention
API complexity
Custom provisioning requires HaloPSA API expertise and ongoing maintenance
Multi-tenant challenges
Azure AD multi-tenant support exists but still requires manual user creation per tenant
Security lag
Deprovisioning delays create potential access risks in MSP environments handling sensitive client data

Summary of challenges

  • HaloPSA does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What HaloPSA actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (All plans)

HaloPSA supports SAML 2.0 integration with identity providers:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsAzure AD, WatchGuard AuthPoint, custom SAML providers
ConfigurationManual setup via HaloPSA admin panel
User matchingEmail-based attribute mapping
JIT provisioning❌ Not supported

Key feature: Self-Service Portal SSO is available, allowing end-users to authenticate via SAML for ticket submission and status checks.

What's missing: User provisioning

HaloPSA has no native SCIM provisioning capabilities. User lifecycle management options are limited to:

Manual creation
Admin creates each user account individually
API-based provisioning
Custom scripts using HaloPSA's REST API
Azure AD sync
Limited deactivation via Halo Integrator when users not found in Azure

The reality for MSPs: You get SSO authentication, but onboarding new technicians, updating roles, or deprovisioning departing staff requires manual intervention or custom API development. For service providers managing hundreds of client accounts, this creates significant administrative overhead.

Okta Integration

No official Okta Integration Network listing exists for HaloPSA. SAML SSO can be configured manually, but requires:

FeatureStatus
SAML SSO✓ Manual configuration
User provisioning❌ Not available
Group sync❌ Not available
Automated deprovisioning❌ Not available

What IT admins are saying

HaloPSA's lack of SCIM provisioning forces MSPs into manual user management workflows:

  • Manual user creation required even with SAML SSO configured
  • No automated deprovisioning when technicians leave the organization
  • API-based workarounds require custom development and maintenance
  • User lifecycle management becomes a separate task from identity provider workflows

User accounts must be manually created or provisioned via API before SSO authentication can work

HaloPSA integration documentation

While Azure AD SSO works well, we still have to remember to manually add and remove users in HaloPSA separately

MSP IT manager on Reddit

The recurring theme

Even with SAML SSO working smoothly, IT teams at MSPs must maintain a separate user management process for HaloPSA, creating security gaps when employees are terminated but not immediately deprovisioned from critical PSA systems.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small MSP (<10 technicians)Manual management acceptable, use SAML SSO
MSP with moderate turnover (20+ users)Use Stitchflow: automation prevents security gaps
Enterprise IT teams (50+ support staff)Use Stitchflow: automation essential for compliance
Multi-tenant MSPs serving multiple clientsUse Stitchflow: automation critical for operational efficiency
Organizations requiring audit trailsUse Stitchflow: automated provisioning provides complete visibility

The bottom line

HaloPSA is a comprehensive PSA platform but offers no SCIM provisioning—only SAML SSO with manual user management. For MSPs and IT teams that need automated provisioning to maintain security and operational efficiency, Stitchflow eliminates the manual overhead entirely.

Make HaloPSA workflows AI-native

HaloPSA has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No native SCIM provisioningSAML SSO for agents and usersManual or API-based user provisioning

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No native SCIM provisioning
  • SAML SSO for agents and users
  • Manual or API-based user provisioning

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Entra ID

Integration type

Microsoft Entra Gallery app

Where to enable

Entra admin center → Enterprise applications → HaloPSA → Single sign-on

Azure AD SSO via SAML. Users can be deactivated in HaloPSA when not found in Azure (via Halo Integrator). Multi-tenant Azure support available.

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
HaloPSA

HaloPSA has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
HaloPSA logo
HaloPSA
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide