Stitchflow
Huntress logo

Huntress SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Huntress user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM not available

Summary and recommendation

Huntress, the managed security platform focused on threat detection and response, offers no SCIM provisioning capabilities on any plan. While Huntress supports SAML and OIDC-based SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, user lifecycle management remains entirely manual. IT teams must create, update, and deactivate user accounts directly in the Huntress console, even for organizations with hundreds of endpoints under management.

This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing security tools that need rapid user onboarding and offboarding. Without automated provisioning, departing employees may retain access to critical security data and investigation tools, creating compliance risks. The manual process also delays new security team members from accessing the platform, potentially impacting incident response capabilities during critical security events.

The strategic alternative

Huntress has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaCustom SAML/OIDC integration
Microsoft Entra IDCustom SAML integration
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Huntress accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Huntress pricing problem

Huntress gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
ProNot disclosed
BusinessNot disclosed
EnterpriseCustom quote

Pricing structure

PlanPricingSCIMSSO
ProNot disclosed❌ Not available✓ Custom SAML/OIDC
BusinessNot disclosed❌ Not available✓ Custom SAML/OIDC
EnterpriseCustom quote❌ Not available✓ Custom SAML/OIDC

What this means in practice

Without SCIM support, IT teams managing Huntress face significant operational overhead:

Manual onboarding required
Each new security team member needs individual account creation in Huntress
No automated offboarding
Departing employees must be manually removed to maintain security posture
Role sync gaps
Changes to user permissions in your IdP don't propagate to Huntress
Audit trail fragmentation
User lifecycle events aren't centrally logged through your identity provider

For a security platform where access control is critical, the lack of automated provisioning creates both operational burden and potential security gaps.

Additional constraints

Custom SSO setup
Both Okta and Entra ID integrations require manual SAML configuration rather than pre-built connectors
Security team bottleneck
IT must coordinate with security teams for every user change in Huntress
Compliance gaps
Manual processes make it harder to demonstrate consistent access controls during audits
Scale limitations
Managing Huntress access becomes increasingly difficult as security teams grow

Summary of challenges

  • Huntress does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Huntress actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Custom Integration)

Huntress supports SAML 2.0 integration with enterprise identity providers:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Microsoft Entra ID, custom SAML providers
ConfigurationCustom integration setup required
User requirementManual account creation in Huntress required

Critical limitation: Huntress requires manual user provisioning. Each user account must be created manually in the Huntress platform before they can authenticate via SSO.

No SCIM Support

Huntress does not offer SCIM provisioning at any pricing tier:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes (custom setup)
SCIM provisioning❌ No
Create users❌ No
Update users❌ No
Deactivate users❌ No
Group management❌ No

This means IT teams must manually:

Create each user account in Huntress
Update user information when roles change
Deactivate accounts when employees leave
Manage group memberships for access control

For security platforms where user access directly impacts threat detection and response capabilities, this manual overhead creates operational risk and delays in user lifecycle management.

What IT admins are saying

Huntress's lack of automated provisioning creates operational overhead for security-focused IT teams:

  • Manual user provisioning required despite SSO availability
  • No way to automatically sync user attributes or group memberships
  • Time-consuming onboarding process for security tooling that should be streamlined
  • Deprovisioning delays create security risks when employees leave

We have SSO working but still have to manually create every user account in Huntress before they can actually access it. For a security platform, you'd think they'd have better identity management.

IT Director, Reddit r/sysadmin

The lack of SCIM means we can't automatically provision users based on their security team membership in AD. Everything has to be done manually, which slows down our incident response team onboarding.

Security Administrator, Spiceworks Community

The recurring theme

Even with SAML SSO configured, IT teams must manually manage user lifecycles in Huntress, creating delays in security tool access and potential security gaps during offboarding.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small security team (<10 users)Manual management is workable
Stable security operations with low turnoverManual management with SSO for authentication
Growing security team (25+ users)Use Stitchflow: automation essential for scaling
Enterprise with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automation required for audit trails
MSP managing multiple client environmentsUse Stitchflow: automation critical for operational efficiency

The bottom line

Huntress provides robust endpoint security, but user management remains entirely manual—there's no SCIM support at any tier. For security teams that need automated provisioning to maintain proper access controls and compliance documentation, Stitchflow delivers the automation that Huntress doesn't offer natively.

Make Huntress workflows AI-native

Huntress has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No SCIM support availableManual user management requiredSSO available via SAML/OIDC

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No SCIM support available
  • Manual user management required
  • SSO available via SAML/OIDC

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Huntress

Huntress has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Huntress logo
Huntress
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Abnormal Security logo

Abnormal Security

No SCIM

Security / Email Security

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Abnormal Security, the AI-powered email security platform protecting against BEC and phishing attacks, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the platform supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not automated user lifecycle management. Security teams must manually provision and deprovision analyst access through Abnormal's portal, creating operational overhead and potential security gaps in a platform specifically designed to protect against email-based threats. This manual provisioning model creates significant challenges for security operations. When new SOC analysts join or existing team members change roles, IT admins must coordinate manual account creation and permission updates in Abnormal Security. For a platform that's critical to threat detection and incident response, delays in provisioning can leave security gaps, while delayed deprovisioning creates compliance risks. The irony is stark: a security platform designed to prevent account takeover and credential abuse lacks the automated provisioning controls that prevent exactly these risks.

View full guide
Airwallex logo

Airwallex

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Airwallex, the global payments and treasury platform, offers no SCIM provisioning support on any plan, including their custom Accelerate enterprise tier. Despite being positioned for enterprise use with features like multi-entity management and advanced treasury controls, Airwallex lacks any official identity provider integrations—no SSO, no provisioning, and no presence in major IdP galleries like Okta's OIN or Microsoft Entra. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing financial access across growing organizations, where manual user provisioning and deprovisioning in a payments platform presents both efficiency and security risks. The absence of identity management capabilities means IT administrators must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Airwallex—a particularly concerning gap given that this platform handles sensitive financial operations, cross-border payments, and treasury management. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees could retain access to financial systems, creating compliance risks and potential security vulnerabilities that most finance and IT teams cannot afford to overlook.

View full guide
Alkami logo

Alkami

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alkami, the digital banking platform used by banks and credit unions, does not offer SCIM provisioning or public SSO integrations. As an enterprise-only platform with custom pricing, Alkami appears to handle user management through direct account administration rather than standardized identity protocols. This creates significant challenges for financial institutions that need to integrate Alkami with their existing identity infrastructure—particularly problematic given the compliance requirements and security standards that banks must maintain. The lack of automated provisioning means IT teams at financial institutions must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Alkami. For a platform handling sensitive financial data and customer information, this manual approach introduces compliance risks and operational overhead. Banks typically require seamless integration between their core identity systems and all applications accessing customer data.

View full guide