Stitchflow
Impact.com logo

Impact.com SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Impact.com user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM not available

Summary and recommendation

Impact.com, the leading partner marketing platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan level. While Impact.com offers SAML SSO integration through identity providers like Okta and Microsoft Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not user lifecycle management. IT teams managing partner marketing programs must manually create, update, and deactivate user accounts in Impact.com, even when paying $5,000+ monthly for Enterprise plans. This creates a significant operational burden, especially for organizations managing complex partner ecosystems with frequent team changes.

The absence of automated provisioning becomes particularly problematic for partner marketing teams that need to rapidly onboard new partners, agencies, and internal stakeholders. Manual account management delays campaign launches, creates compliance gaps when employees leave, and forces IT teams to maintain separate user management processes for a platform that's critical to revenue operations. SSO alone doesn't solve this problem—it only authenticates users who already have manually-created accounts.

The strategic alternative

Impact.com has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaListed as Impact Radius (former name). SSO supported, no SCIM provisioning.
Microsoft Entra IDSAML SSO supported via AD FS, Okta, OneLogin, and Microsoft Entra ID. No SCIM.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Impact.com accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Impact.com pricing problem

Impact.com gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Starter$30/mo or 3% revenue
Essential~$500-$2,500/mo
Pro/Enterprise~$5,000+/mo

Pricing and provisioning features

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Starter$30/mo or 3% revenue
Essential~$500-$2,500/mo
Pro/Enterprise~$5,000+/mo

What this means in practice

Without SCIM provisioning, IT teams face ongoing manual overhead:

New hire delays
Each new partner marketing team member requires manual account creation in Impact.com before they can use SSO
Offboarding gaps
Departing employees must be manually deprovisioned, creating security risks if forgotten
Role management complexity
Changing user permissions requires manual updates in both your IdP and Impact.com
Audit compliance issues
No automated logs of provisioning/deprovisioning events for compliance reporting

Additional constraints

SSO email matching requirement
Impact.com requires exact email address matches between your IdP and their platform
Limited SSO availability
SAML SSO only available on Essential plans and above (~$6,000+ annually minimum)
Integration-only SSO
Impact.com integrates with Okta, AD FS, OneLogin, and Entra ID but requires per-provider configuration
No group-based access
Cannot leverage IdP groups to automatically assign Impact.com permissions or partner program access

Summary of challenges

  • Impact.com does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Impact.com actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Higher-tier plans)

Impact.com supports SAML 2.0 integration with identity providers:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, OneLogin, Microsoft Entra ID, AD FS
ConfigurationManual SAML setup via Impact.com admin panel
User requirementManual account creation required before SSO login
Plan requirementEssential ($500-$2,500/mo) or higher

Critical limitation: Impact.com's SSO requires pre-existing user accounts. Users must be manually created in Impact.com before they can authenticate via SAML SSO.

Okta Integration (via OIN)

The official Okta Integration Network listing shows Impact.com (listed as "Impact Radius") supports:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes
OIDC SSO❌ No
SCIM provisioning❌ No
Create users❌ No
Update users❌ No
Deactivate users❌ No
Group sync❌ No

Translation: You get federated authentication but zero provisioning capabilities. Every user account must be manually created, updated, and deactivated in Impact.com's admin interface.

Microsoft Entra ID Integration

Impact.com supports SAML SSO through Microsoft Entra ID but offers no automated provisioning:

Manual user account creation required
No attribute mapping or user updates
Email addresses must match between Entra ID and Impact.com
Deactivation requires manual action in both systems

Bottom line: Impact.com provides basic SAML SSO on higher-tier plans but requires complete manual user lifecycle management. Organizations pay $6,000+ annually for Essential plans and still handle all provisioning tasks manually.

What IT admins are saying

Impact.com's lack of automated provisioning creates operational overhead for IT teams managing partner marketing platforms:

  • Manual user creation required even with SSO enabled
  • No automated deprovisioning when employees leave
  • Email address matching requirements between IdP and Impact.com
  • Limited SSO availability across different pricing tiers

Even though we have SAML SSO set up, we still have to manually create every user account in Impact before they can sign in. It defeats half the purpose of having SSO in the first place.

IT Director, Mid-market SaaS company

The biggest pain point is remembering to remove users from Impact when someone leaves. Since there's no SCIM, it's just another system we have to remember to clean up manually.

Systems Administrator, E-commerce company

The recurring theme

Impact.com treats SSO as authentication-only, leaving IT teams to manually manage the complete user lifecycle. Without automated provisioning and deprovisioning, Impact becomes another system requiring manual oversight in an already complex identity management landscape.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small partner marketing team (<10 users)Manual management is acceptable
Stable affiliate program with low turnoverManual management with SSO for authentication
Growing enterprise with 25+ marketing usersUse Stitchflow: automation essential for scaling
Multi-brand companies managing multiple programsUse Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended
Organizations with compliance/audit requirementsUse Stitchflow: automation essential for audit trail

The bottom line

Impact.com is a leading partner marketing platform, but it offers no SCIM provisioning regardless of plan tier. Even with SAML SSO available, user accounts must be created and managed manually. For marketing organizations that need automated user lifecycle management, Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning without the enterprise overhead.

Make Impact.com workflows AI-native

Impact.com has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No SCIM provisioning supportSAML SSO available but limited to specific editionsManual user management requiredSSO requires matching email addresses between IdP and Impact.com

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No SCIM provisioning support
  • SAML SSO available but limited to specific editions
  • Manual user management required
  • SSO requires matching email addresses between IdP and Impact.com

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Impact.com → Sign On

Listed as Impact Radius (former name). SSO supported, no SCIM provisioning.

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
Impact.com

Impact.com has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Impact.com logo
Impact.com
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Abnormal Security logo

Abnormal Security

No SCIM

Security / Email Security

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Abnormal Security, the AI-powered email security platform protecting against BEC and phishing attacks, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the platform supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not automated user lifecycle management. Security teams must manually provision and deprovision analyst access through Abnormal's portal, creating operational overhead and potential security gaps in a platform specifically designed to protect against email-based threats. This manual provisioning model creates significant challenges for security operations. When new SOC analysts join or existing team members change roles, IT admins must coordinate manual account creation and permission updates in Abnormal Security. For a platform that's critical to threat detection and incident response, delays in provisioning can leave security gaps, while delayed deprovisioning creates compliance risks. The irony is stark: a security platform designed to prevent account takeover and credential abuse lacks the automated provisioning controls that prevent exactly these risks.

View full guide
Airwallex logo

Airwallex

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Airwallex, the global payments and treasury platform, offers no SCIM provisioning support on any plan, including their custom Accelerate enterprise tier. Despite being positioned for enterprise use with features like multi-entity management and advanced treasury controls, Airwallex lacks any official identity provider integrations—no SSO, no provisioning, and no presence in major IdP galleries like Okta's OIN or Microsoft Entra. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing financial access across growing organizations, where manual user provisioning and deprovisioning in a payments platform presents both efficiency and security risks. The absence of identity management capabilities means IT administrators must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Airwallex—a particularly concerning gap given that this platform handles sensitive financial operations, cross-border payments, and treasury management. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees could retain access to financial systems, creating compliance risks and potential security vulnerabilities that most finance and IT teams cannot afford to overlook.

View full guide
Alkami logo

Alkami

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alkami, the digital banking platform used by banks and credit unions, does not offer SCIM provisioning or public SSO integrations. As an enterprise-only platform with custom pricing, Alkami appears to handle user management through direct account administration rather than standardized identity protocols. This creates significant challenges for financial institutions that need to integrate Alkami with their existing identity infrastructure—particularly problematic given the compliance requirements and security standards that banks must maintain. The lack of automated provisioning means IT teams at financial institutions must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Alkami. For a platform handling sensitive financial data and customer information, this manual approach introduces compliance risks and operational overhead. Banks typically require seamless integration between their core identity systems and all applications accessing customer data.

View full guide