Stitchflow
Material Security logo

Material Security SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Material Security user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM not available

Summary and recommendation

Material Security, the email security platform that protects against advanced threats, offers no SCIM provisioning support on any plan. Despite supporting SSO through custom SAML integrations with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, Material Security requires manual user provisioning for all account creation and management. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing email security access, particularly in organizations where rapid onboarding and offboarding are critical for maintaining security posture.

The lack of automated provisioning creates a dangerous gap in email security management. When employees join, change roles, or leave the organization, their Material Security access must be manually updated by administrators. This manual process introduces delays that can leave new employees vulnerable to email threats or, worse, allow departed employees to retain access to sensitive security configurations. For a platform designed to protect against sophisticated email attacks, the inability to automate user lifecycle management undermines the very security objectives it's meant to support.

The strategic alternative

Material Security has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaCustom SAML integration
Microsoft Entra IDCustom SAML integration
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Material Security accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Material Security pricing problem

Material Security gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
ProNot disclosed
BusinessNot disclosed
EnterpriseCustom quote

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSCIM
ProNot disclosed❌ Not available
BusinessNot disclosed❌ Not available
EnterpriseCustom quote❌ Not available

SSO capabilities

Custom SAML integration available across plans
No automated provisioning tied to SSO flows
Manual account creation required before SSO authentication

What this means in practice

Manual provisioning workflow

1. IT admin manually creates user accounts in Material Security console 2. Configure user permissions and role assignments individually 3. Send login instructions to users via email 4. Users authenticate via SAML SSO (if configured)

Scale limitations

Onboarding 50+ users requires hours of manual console work
No way to sync departmental changes from your IdP
Role changes must be updated manually in Material Security
Offboarding requires remembering to disable accounts in multiple systems

Additional constraints

No deprovisioning automation
Former employees retain access until manually removed
Permission drift
No way to audit or sync role assignments with your IdP groups
Custom SAML setup
Requires back-and-forth with Material Security support team
No user attribute sync
Department, manager, location data stays static after initial creation

Summary of challenges

  • Material Security does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Material Security actually offers for identity

Custom SAML Integration

Material Security supports SAML-based single sign-on through custom configuration:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Entra ID, Google Workspace, custom SAML providers
ConfigurationManual SAML setup with Material Security support team
User requirementManual user provisioning required

Critical limitation: Material Security offers no automated user provisioning. Every user account must be manually created, updated, and deprovisioned in the Material Security console.

No Okta Integration Network Listing

Material Security does not have an official Okta Integration Network (OIN) app. Organizations must configure SAML SSO manually through Okta's generic SAML template.

No Azure AD Gallery Listing

Similarly, Material Security is not available in the Azure AD/Entra ID application gallery. Custom SAML configuration is required through Entra ID's non-gallery application process.

What's Missing

No SCIM support
Zero automated provisioning capabilities
No user lifecycle management
Manual onboarding/offboarding for every user
No group mapping
Cannot sync organizational structure or role-based access
No profile updates
Name changes, department moves require manual updates
No automated deprovisioning
Former employees retain access until manually removed

For security-focused organizations, this manual approach creates significant operational overhead and potential compliance gaps.

What IT admins are saying

Material Security's lack of automated provisioning forces IT teams into manual workflows for a critical security platform:

  • Manual user creation required for every new employee
  • No automated deprovisioning when employees leave the organization
  • SSO setup requires custom SAML configuration rather than pre-built connectors
  • User lifecycle management completely disconnected from identity provider

We have to manually add each user to Material Security, even though we have SSO set up. It's another system to remember when onboarding and offboarding.

IT Director, Reddit discussion

The lack of SCIM integration means we can't automate user provisioning like we do with our other security tools. Everything has to be done by hand.

System Administrator, security community forum

The recurring theme

Despite Material Security's advanced email security capabilities, IT teams are stuck with manual user management that doesn't scale with organizational growth and creates gaps in employee lifecycle automation.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small security team (<10 users)Manual management acceptable for now
Growing organization with moderate turnoverUse Stitchflow: automation prevents security gaps
Enterprise with strict compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: essential for audit trail and access control
Multi-tenant or complex organizational structureUse Stitchflow: manual provisioning becomes unmanageable
Security-first organization needing rapid onboarding/offboardingUse Stitchflow: automation critical for zero-delay access revocation

The bottom line

Material Security offers enterprise-grade email protection but provides no automated provisioning capabilities whatsoever. For security teams that need reliable user lifecycle management without the operational burden of manual account creation and deactivation, Stitchflow delivers the automation that Material Security doesn't offer.

Make Material Security workflows AI-native

Material Security has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No SCIM support availableManual user provisioning requiredSSO via custom SAML configuration

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No SCIM support available
  • Manual user provisioning required
  • SSO via custom SAML configuration

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Material Security

Material Security has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Material Security logo
Material Security
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Abnormal Security logo

Abnormal Security

No SCIM

Security / Email Security

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Abnormal Security, the AI-powered email security platform protecting against BEC and phishing attacks, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the platform supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not automated user lifecycle management. Security teams must manually provision and deprovision analyst access through Abnormal's portal, creating operational overhead and potential security gaps in a platform specifically designed to protect against email-based threats. This manual provisioning model creates significant challenges for security operations. When new SOC analysts join or existing team members change roles, IT admins must coordinate manual account creation and permission updates in Abnormal Security. For a platform that's critical to threat detection and incident response, delays in provisioning can leave security gaps, while delayed deprovisioning creates compliance risks. The irony is stark: a security platform designed to prevent account takeover and credential abuse lacks the automated provisioning controls that prevent exactly these risks.

View full guide
Airwallex logo

Airwallex

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Airwallex, the global payments and treasury platform, offers no SCIM provisioning support on any plan, including their custom Accelerate enterprise tier. Despite being positioned for enterprise use with features like multi-entity management and advanced treasury controls, Airwallex lacks any official identity provider integrations—no SSO, no provisioning, and no presence in major IdP galleries like Okta's OIN or Microsoft Entra. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing financial access across growing organizations, where manual user provisioning and deprovisioning in a payments platform presents both efficiency and security risks. The absence of identity management capabilities means IT administrators must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Airwallex—a particularly concerning gap given that this platform handles sensitive financial operations, cross-border payments, and treasury management. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees could retain access to financial systems, creating compliance risks and potential security vulnerabilities that most finance and IT teams cannot afford to overlook.

View full guide
Alkami logo

Alkami

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alkami, the digital banking platform used by banks and credit unions, does not offer SCIM provisioning or public SSO integrations. As an enterprise-only platform with custom pricing, Alkami appears to handle user management through direct account administration rather than standardized identity protocols. This creates significant challenges for financial institutions that need to integrate Alkami with their existing identity infrastructure—particularly problematic given the compliance requirements and security standards that banks must maintain. The lack of automated provisioning means IT teams at financial institutions must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Alkami. For a platform handling sensitive financial data and customer information, this manual approach introduces compliance risks and operational overhead. Banks typically require seamless integration between their core identity systems and all applications accessing customer data.

View full guide