Stitchflow
Paddle logo

Paddle SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Paddle user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Paddle, the SaaS billing and payments platform that handles merchant of record services, does not offer SCIM provisioning or publicly documented enterprise security features. While Paddle supports SAML SSO integration with major identity providers, there's no public documentation on user lifecycle management capabilities. As a billing infrastructure platform primarily used by finance teams and developers, Paddle appears to handle user access through manual account management rather than automated provisioning.

This creates a significant gap for enterprise IT teams who need to automate user onboarding and offboarding across all business-critical applications, including billing platforms that handle sensitive financial data. Manual user management in Paddle means IT admins can't enforce consistent access policies or ensure timely deprovisioning when employees leave—creating compliance risks for SOX audits and financial controls. The lack of public documentation on enterprise security features suggests organizations must work directly with Paddle's sales team to understand available options, adding friction to the evaluation process.

The strategic alternative

Paddle has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolUnknown
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaVia third-partyNo Paddle app found in Okta OIN catalog. Contact Paddle for enterprise SSO options.
Microsoft Entra IDVia third-partyNo documented Microsoft Entra ID integration. Contact Paddle for enterprise security features.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Paddle accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Paddle pricing problem

Paddle gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Standard5% + $0.50 per transaction

Pricing and provisioning options

PlanPricingSCIMSSO
Standard5% + $0.50 per transaction❌ Not availableContact vendor

Market context

Average enterprise spend
~$8,500/year
No monthly fees, purely transaction-based billing
Custom pricing available for products under $10

What this means in practice

Paddle's billing-focused architecture creates several provisioning challenges:

No automated user management
SCIM provisioning is not available, requiring manual account creation and removal
Limited user base
Most Paddle users are finance/billing staff rather than large employee populations
Undocumented SSO
Enterprise SSO features exist but require direct vendor contact for implementation
Manual offboarding risk
Without automated deprovisioning, former employees may retain access to sensitive billing data

Additional constraints

Vendor dependency
All enterprise security features require direct negotiation with Paddle sales
Documentation gaps
No public SSO/SCIM documentation makes planning difficult
Limited IdP support
Unknown compatibility with specific identity providers without vendor consultation
Billing-first design
Platform prioritizes payment processing over user management workflows

Summary of challenges

  • Paddle does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Paddle actually offers for identity

Limited Enterprise Security Documentation

Paddle is primarily a SaaS billing platform (Merchant of Record) with minimal public documentation on enterprise identity features:

FeatureStatus
SAML SSOMentioned but not documented
SCIM provisioning❌ Not available
JIT provisioning❌ Not supported
Public SSO docs❌ None found
Enterprise securityContact vendor required

IdP Support (Where Documented)

Based on available information, Paddle appears to support basic SSO with select providers:

SAML SSO
Referenced but no public configuration guides
Okta
No official OIN app listing found
Azure AD/Entra
No documented integration
Google Workspace
Basic support mentioned
OneLogin
No confirmed support

The core issue: Paddle operates as billing infrastructure with limited user management needs. Most teams using Paddle have a small number of finance/billing operations users who need access, making traditional enterprise provisioning less relevant.

Why This Approach Falls Short

For enterprise customers, Paddle's lack of public SSO/SCIM documentation creates several problems:

Security compliance gaps
No documented provisioning controls
Manual user management
All account creation/deletion requires vendor contact
Limited access governance
No automated role assignments or deprovisioning
Audit trail concerns
Unclear logging for user access changes

The pay-as-you-go pricing model (5% + $0.50 per transaction) means you're already paying enterprise rates for transaction volume, but enterprise security features remain unclear.

What IT admins are saying

Paddle's lack of public documentation around enterprise security features leaves IT teams in the dark:

  • No publicly available SSO or SCIM documentation despite enterprise customers needing these features
  • Having to contact sales just to understand basic identity management capabilities
  • Uncertainty about what security features are available and at what cost
  • Limited visibility into user management options for a platform handling sensitive billing data

No public SSO/SCIM documentation available - contact vendor for enterprise security features

Multiple integration attempts

Payment/subscription platform with limited user management needs documented publicly

IT evaluation notes

The recurring theme

For a platform processing payments and handling financial data, the lack of transparent security documentation forces IT teams into lengthy vendor conversations just to understand basic provisioning capabilities.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small billing team (<10 users)Manual user management is workable
Simple payment processing needsUse Paddle's standard plan with manual access
Growing SaaS with 20+ billing usersUse Stitchflow: automation prevents billing disruption
Enterprise with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: essential for financial system audit trails
Multi-product billing operationsUse Stitchflow: automation critical for payment infrastructure

The bottom line

Paddle is robust billing infrastructure, but enterprise identity management isn't publicly documented. For finance teams that need reliable provisioning automation for their payment operations, Stitchflow eliminates the guesswork and ensures your billing team access is always properly managed.

Make Paddle workflows AI-native

Paddle has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No public SSO/SCIM documentationPrimarily billing infrastructureContact vendor for enterprise security features

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No public SSO/SCIM documentation
  • Primarily billing infrastructure
  • Contact vendor for enterprise security features

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Paddle

Paddle has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Paddle logo
Paddle
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide