Summary and recommendation
Partnerize, the partner marketing platform used by enterprise brands, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Partnerize offers SAML SSO integration through Okta (and potentially other identity providers), this only handles authentication, not user lifecycle management. Enterprise customers paying $2,000+ per month still face manual user provisioning, deprovisioning, and role management across their partner marketing teams.
This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing access to a platform that handles sensitive partner relationships and commission data. Without automated provisioning, onboarding new partnership managers requires manual account creation, while offboarding poses compliance risks if accounts aren't promptly deactivated. For organizations with distributed partner teams or frequent role changes, this manual overhead scales poorly and increases security exposure.
The strategic alternative
Partnerize has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.
Quick SCIM facts
| SCIM available? | No |
| SCIM tier required | N/A |
| SSO required first? | No |
| SSO available? | Yes |
| SSO protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Documentation | Not available |
Supported identity providers
| IdP | SSO | SCIM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta | ✓ | ❌ | SSO via SAML, SWA, and OIDC supported. No provisioning/SCIM support. |
| Microsoft Entra ID | Via third-party | ❌ | No official Entra gallery integration found |
| Google Workspace | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
| OneLogin | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
The cost of not automating
Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Partnerize accounts manually. Here's what that costs:
The Partnerize pricing problem
Partnerize gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.
Tier comparison
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Custom tiers | From ~$2,000/month |
Pricing and provisioning structure
| Plan | Pricing | SCIM | SSO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Custom tiers | From ~$2,000/month | ❌ Not available | ✓ SAML, OIDC, SWA |
What this means in practice
Manual provisioning overhead at enterprise scale: Organizations paying $24,000+ annually for Partnerize must still manually create, update, and deactivate user accounts. This creates significant operational friction for a platform that typically serves marketing teams, agencies, and partner managers who need rapid access provisioning.
Identity management gaps: While Partnerize supports SSO through multiple protocols (SAML, OIDC, SWA), users must still be pre-created in the platform before SSO authentication works. This two-step process defeats the automation benefits that enterprise customers expect at this price point.
Compliance and security risks: Without automated deprovisioning, terminated employees retain potential access to partner relationships, commission data, and campaign performance metrics—creating both security vulnerabilities and compliance issues for organizations managing affiliate partnerships.
Additional constraints
Summary of challenges
- Partnerize does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
- Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
- Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually
What Partnerize actually offers for identity
SAML SSO (Enterprise tier)
Partnerize provides SAML 2.0 integration with identity providers on their Enterprise plan:
| Setting | Details |
|---|---|
| Protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Supported IdPs | Okta, Entra ID, Google Workspace, custom SAML providers |
| Pricing requirement | Enterprise plan (~$2,000+/month) |
| User management | Manual account creation required |
Okta Integration (via OIN)
The official Okta Integration Network listing for Partnerize shows limited capabilities:
| Feature | Supported? |
|---|---|
| SAML SSO | ✓ Yes |
| OIDC SSO | ✓ Yes |
| SWA (password vaulting) | ✓ Yes |
| Create users | ❌ No |
| Update users | ❌ No |
| Deactivate users | ❌ No |
| Group push | ❌ No |
| SCIM provisioning | ❌ No |
The reality: You get SSO authentication but zero automated user lifecycle management. Every user account must be manually created, updated, and deactivated in Partnerize.
What's missing for IT teams
For partner marketing teams that need basic user lifecycle automation, Partnerize's identity features fall short of modern SCIM expectations.
What IT admins are saying
Community sentiment on Partnerize's user management reveals significant frustration with manual processes:
- Manual user creation required - No automated provisioning means IT must create every account by hand
- No SCIM support - Users must be managed separately from your identity provider, even with SSO
- Enterprise-only pricing - Custom pricing from ~$2,000/month creates barriers for smaller teams
- Limited identity provider integration - Only Okta SSO is officially supported, leaving Entra and Google Workspace users with workarounds
SSO via SAML, SWA, and OIDC supported. No provisioning/SCIM support.
User accounts must exist in Partnerize to use single sign-on... SSO does not substitute account creation.
The recurring theme
Partnerize treats user provisioning as a manual afterthought. Even with SSO configured, IT teams must separately create, update, and deactivate user accounts in Partnerize whenever team members join, change roles, or leave the company.
The decision
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Small partner marketing team (<10 users) | Manual management is workable given limited headcount |
| Enterprise with distributed partner teams | Use Stitchflow: automation essential for scale |
| Organizations with strict offboarding requirements | Use Stitchflow: manual deprovisioning creates security gaps |
| Mid-market companies growing partner programs | Use Stitchflow: prevents manual overhead as team scales |
| Companies with high partner manager turnover | Use Stitchflow: frequent access changes require automation |
The bottom line
Partnerize is a robust partner marketing platform, but it offers zero provisioning automation—not even basic SCIM support. With custom enterprise pricing starting around $2,000/month, the lack of modern identity management is a significant gap. For organizations that need reliable user lifecycle automation, Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning without the platform limitations.
Make Partnerize workflows AI-native
Partnerize has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.
Technical specifications
SCIM Version
Not specifiedSupported Operations
Not specifiedSupported Attributes
Plan requirement
Not specifiedPrerequisites
Not specifiedKey limitations
- No SCIM provisioning support
- Manual user management required
- Custom pricing only - requires contacting sales
- Mid-market to enterprise focus
Documentation not available.
Configuration for Okta
Integration type
Okta Integration Network (OIN) app
Where to enable
Docs
SSO via SAML, SWA, and OIDC supported. No provisioning/SCIM support.
Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.
Unlock SCIM for
Partnerize
Partnerize has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.
See how it works


