Stitchflow
Partnerize logo

Partnerize SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Partnerize user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM not available

Summary and recommendation

Partnerize, the partner marketing platform used by enterprise brands, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Partnerize offers SAML SSO integration through Okta (and potentially other identity providers), this only handles authentication, not user lifecycle management. Enterprise customers paying $2,000+ per month still face manual user provisioning, deprovisioning, and role management across their partner marketing teams.

This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing access to a platform that handles sensitive partner relationships and commission data. Without automated provisioning, onboarding new partnership managers requires manual account creation, while offboarding poses compliance risks if accounts aren't promptly deactivated. For organizations with distributed partner teams or frequent role changes, this manual overhead scales poorly and increases security exposure.

The strategic alternative

Partnerize has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaSSO via SAML, SWA, and OIDC supported. No provisioning/SCIM support.
Microsoft Entra IDVia third-partyNo official Entra gallery integration found
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Partnerize accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Partnerize pricing problem

Partnerize gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Custom tiersFrom ~$2,000/month

Pricing and provisioning structure

PlanPricingSCIMSSO
Custom tiersFrom ~$2,000/month❌ Not available✓ SAML, OIDC, SWA

What this means in practice

Manual provisioning overhead at enterprise scale: Organizations paying $24,000+ annually for Partnerize must still manually create, update, and deactivate user accounts. This creates significant operational friction for a platform that typically serves marketing teams, agencies, and partner managers who need rapid access provisioning.

Identity management gaps: While Partnerize supports SSO through multiple protocols (SAML, OIDC, SWA), users must still be pre-created in the platform before SSO authentication works. This two-step process defeats the automation benefits that enterprise customers expect at this price point.

Compliance and security risks: Without automated deprovisioning, terminated employees retain potential access to partner relationships, commission data, and campaign performance metrics—creating both security vulnerabilities and compliance issues for organizations managing affiliate partnerships.

Additional constraints

No public pricing transparency
All pricing requires sales contact, making it difficult to budget for both the platform and associated provisioning overhead
High-value application risk
Partner marketing platforms often control significant revenue streams, making manual access management particularly risky
Multi-stakeholder complexity
Typical users span marketing, partnerships, and finance teams, increasing the coordination required for manual user management
No Entra ID gallery integration
Microsoft customers have no official integration path, limiting SSO options for Windows-centric organizations

Summary of challenges

  • Partnerize does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Partnerize actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Enterprise tier)

Partnerize provides SAML 2.0 integration with identity providers on their Enterprise plan:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Entra ID, Google Workspace, custom SAML providers
Pricing requirementEnterprise plan (~$2,000+/month)
User managementManual account creation required

Okta Integration (via OIN)

The official Okta Integration Network listing for Partnerize shows limited capabilities:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes
OIDC SSO✓ Yes
SWA (password vaulting)✓ Yes
Create users❌ No
Update users❌ No
Deactivate users❌ No
Group push❌ No
SCIM provisioning❌ No

The reality: You get SSO authentication but zero automated user lifecycle management. Every user account must be manually created, updated, and deactivated in Partnerize.

What's missing for IT teams

No automated provisioning
Manual user creation for every new hire
No deprovisioning
Ex-employees retain access until manually removed
No group sync
Role assignments must be configured individually
Enterprise pricing barrier
SSO requires ~$2,000+/month minimum spend

For partner marketing teams that need basic user lifecycle automation, Partnerize's identity features fall short of modern SCIM expectations.

What IT admins are saying

Community sentiment on Partnerize's user management reveals significant frustration with manual processes:

  • Manual user creation required - No automated provisioning means IT must create every account by hand
  • No SCIM support - Users must be managed separately from your identity provider, even with SSO
  • Enterprise-only pricing - Custom pricing from ~$2,000/month creates barriers for smaller teams
  • Limited identity provider integration - Only Okta SSO is officially supported, leaving Entra and Google Workspace users with workarounds

SSO via SAML, SWA, and OIDC supported. No provisioning/SCIM support.

Okta Integration Network

User accounts must exist in Partnerize to use single sign-on... SSO does not substitute account creation.

Common IT admin experience across partner marketing platforms

The recurring theme

Partnerize treats user provisioning as a manual afterthought. Even with SSO configured, IT teams must separately create, update, and deactivate user accounts in Partnerize whenever team members join, change roles, or leave the company.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small partner marketing team (<10 users)Manual management is workable given limited headcount
Enterprise with distributed partner teamsUse Stitchflow: automation essential for scale
Organizations with strict offboarding requirementsUse Stitchflow: manual deprovisioning creates security gaps
Mid-market companies growing partner programsUse Stitchflow: prevents manual overhead as team scales
Companies with high partner manager turnoverUse Stitchflow: frequent access changes require automation

The bottom line

Partnerize is a robust partner marketing platform, but it offers zero provisioning automation—not even basic SCIM support. With custom enterprise pricing starting around $2,000/month, the lack of modern identity management is a significant gap. For organizations that need reliable user lifecycle automation, Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning without the platform limitations.

Make Partnerize workflows AI-native

Partnerize has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No SCIM provisioning supportManual user management requiredCustom pricing only - requires contacting salesMid-market to enterprise focus

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No SCIM provisioning support
  • Manual user management required
  • Custom pricing only - requires contacting sales
  • Mid-market to enterprise focus

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Partnerize → Sign On

SSO via SAML, SWA, and OIDC supported. No provisioning/SCIM support.

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
Partnerize

Partnerize has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Partnerize logo
Partnerize
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Abnormal Security logo

Abnormal Security

No SCIM

Security / Email Security

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Abnormal Security, the AI-powered email security platform protecting against BEC and phishing attacks, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the platform supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not automated user lifecycle management. Security teams must manually provision and deprovision analyst access through Abnormal's portal, creating operational overhead and potential security gaps in a platform specifically designed to protect against email-based threats. This manual provisioning model creates significant challenges for security operations. When new SOC analysts join or existing team members change roles, IT admins must coordinate manual account creation and permission updates in Abnormal Security. For a platform that's critical to threat detection and incident response, delays in provisioning can leave security gaps, while delayed deprovisioning creates compliance risks. The irony is stark: a security platform designed to prevent account takeover and credential abuse lacks the automated provisioning controls that prevent exactly these risks.

View full guide
Airwallex logo

Airwallex

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Airwallex, the global payments and treasury platform, offers no SCIM provisioning support on any plan, including their custom Accelerate enterprise tier. Despite being positioned for enterprise use with features like multi-entity management and advanced treasury controls, Airwallex lacks any official identity provider integrations—no SSO, no provisioning, and no presence in major IdP galleries like Okta's OIN or Microsoft Entra. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing financial access across growing organizations, where manual user provisioning and deprovisioning in a payments platform presents both efficiency and security risks. The absence of identity management capabilities means IT administrators must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Airwallex—a particularly concerning gap given that this platform handles sensitive financial operations, cross-border payments, and treasury management. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees could retain access to financial systems, creating compliance risks and potential security vulnerabilities that most finance and IT teams cannot afford to overlook.

View full guide
Alkami logo

Alkami

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alkami, the digital banking platform used by banks and credit unions, does not offer SCIM provisioning or public SSO integrations. As an enterprise-only platform with custom pricing, Alkami appears to handle user management through direct account administration rather than standardized identity protocols. This creates significant challenges for financial institutions that need to integrate Alkami with their existing identity infrastructure—particularly problematic given the compliance requirements and security standards that banks must maintain. The lack of automated provisioning means IT teams at financial institutions must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Alkami. For a platform handling sensitive financial data and customer information, this manual approach introduces compliance risks and operational overhead. Banks typically require seamless integration between their core identity systems and all applications accessing customer data.

View full guide