Stitchflow
Paycom logo

Paycom SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Paycom user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Paycom, the HR and payroll platform for mid-market companies (50-750 employees), does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Paycom supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with major identity providers, user provisioning requires third-party middleware solutions like RoboMQ Hire2Retire or Aquera Sync Bridge. This creates a complex integration architecture where IT teams must manage and maintain additional middleware components just to automate basic user lifecycle operations.

The lack of native SCIM support is particularly problematic given Paycom's role as an HR source system. As employee data changes in Paycom—new hires, role changes, terminations—these updates don't automatically propagate to connected applications without custom middleware. This forces IT teams to either manually sync user accounts across systems or invest in expensive third-party solutions that add complexity and potential failure points to their identity infrastructure.

The strategic alternative

Stitchflow provides SCIM-level provisioning through resilient browser automation for Paycom without requiring middleware or custom development work. Works with any Paycom plan and integrates with Okta, Entra ID, Google Workspace, and OneLogin. Flat pricing under $5K/year, regardless of employee count.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaNo pre-built Okta OIN integration with native provisioning. Use RoboMQ Hire2Retire for Okta Directory sync.
Microsoft Entra IDNo native Entra SCIM connector. Use RoboMQ Hire2Retire or Aquera Paycom Sync Bridge for AD/Entra ID provisioning.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Paycom accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Paycom pricing problem

Paycom gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Native integrationN/A
Third-party middleware$3K-15K+/year
⚠️ Via RoboMQ/Aquera
Manual processesStaff time

Provisioning options

MethodCostSCIM SupportSSO Support
Native integrationN/A❌ Not available✓ SAML 2.0
Third-party middleware$3K-15K+/year⚠️ Via RoboMQ/Aquera✓ SAML 2.0
Manual processesStaff time❌ Manual only✓ SAML 2.0

Paycom pricing for context

Full HCM platform
$25-36/employee/month
Payroll-only
$12-18/employee/month
Implementation fee
15-35% of first-year subscription
50+ employee minimum

What this means in practice

Since Paycom doesn't offer native SCIM, IT teams face a fundamental workflow problem:

Manual provisioning scenario (200 employees)

New hire in Paycom → Manual account creation across 10-15 SaaS apps
Role change → Manual permission updates across all systems
Termination → Manual deactivation with potential security gaps
Estimated time
30-45 minutes per employee lifecycle event

Third-party middleware scenario

Requires separate contracts with vendors like RoboMQ Hire2Retire or Aquera
Additional $3K-15K annual licensing costs
Complex three-way integration (Paycom → middleware → target apps)
Multiple support relationships when issues arise

Additional constraints

Reverse data flow problem
Paycom expects to be the HR source, but can't efficiently distribute that data
No JIT provisioning
Users must be pre-created before SSO authentication works
Middleware dependency
Third-party tools create single points of failure for critical HR workflows
Limited IdP coverage
Most middleware solutions focus on Active Directory/Entra ID sync only
Implementation complexity
Setting up Paycom → middleware → multiple SaaS apps requires significant technical expertise

Summary of challenges

  • Paycom does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Paycom actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Standard feature)

Paycom supports SAML 2.0 integration with major identity providers:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Azure AD, OneLogin, JumpCloud, generic SAML
InitiationBoth SP-initiated and IdP-initiated
Testing modeMixed mode allows SSO and local login during implementation
Audit trailUnchangeable audit trail maintained for compliance

What's missing: SCIM provisioning

Paycom has no native SCIM support. As an HR/Payroll platform, Paycom is typically the source of truth for employee data—not the destination for provisioning.

For organizations that need to sync Paycom employee data to Active Directory or other systems, you'll need third-party middleware:

SolutionPurpose
RoboMQ Hire2RetireSyncs Paycom employee data to AD/Entra ID
Aquera Sync BridgeAlternative middleware for Paycom-to-AD sync

The fundamental problem: These middleware solutions add complexity, cost, and another vendor relationship just to handle what should be basic identity lifecycle management.

What IT admins are saying

Paycom's lack of native SCIM provisioning forces IT teams into complex workarounds:

  • No built-in user provisioning despite being a $25-36/employee/month platform
  • Must use third-party middleware like RoboMQ or Aquera for basic AD/Entra sync
  • Additional licensing costs and integration complexity for what should be standard functionality
  • HR system that can't automatically sync users to other applications without middleware

No native SCIM documented... use third-party middleware like RoboMQ or Aquera for AD/Entra sync.

Integration documentation

Paycom is an HR/Payroll source system for mid-market. SSO available. For provisioning, use third-party solutions like RoboMQ Hire2Retire or Aquera Sync Bridge.

Implementation guidance

The recurring theme

Paycom positions itself as a comprehensive HR platform but requires expensive third-party solutions to handle basic user provisioning that competitors include natively. IT teams pay premium pricing but still need additional tools to automate user lifecycle management.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small HR team (<50 employees)Manual user management is workable
Paycom as secondary HR systemManual management with SSO for authentication
Mid-market company (100+ employees)Use Stitchflow: automation essential for scale
Multi-system HR environmentUse Stitchflow: avoid expensive third-party middleware
Enterprise with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automated audit trail without middleware costs

The bottom line

Paycom is a solid HR/Payroll platform for mid-market companies, but it offers no native SCIM provisioning capabilities. Third-party middleware solutions like RoboMQ can cost thousands annually on top of Paycom's already premium pricing. Stitchflow delivers managed automation at <$5K/year flat rate—simpler and more cost-effective than cobbling together middleware solutions.

Automate Paycom without third-party complexity

Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning through resilient browser automation, backed by 24/7 human in the loop for Paycom at <$5K/year, flat, regardless of team size.

Works alongside or instead of native SCIM
Syncs with your existing IdP (Okta, Entra ID, Google Workspace)
Automates onboarding and offboarding
SOC 2 Type II certified
24/7 human-in-the-loop monitoring
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No native SCIM documentedHR source system for employee dataThird-party middleware required for provisioningMixed mode auth available during SSO testing

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No native SCIM documented
  • HR source system for employee data
  • Third-party middleware required for provisioning
  • Mixed mode auth available during SSO testing

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Entra ID

Integration type

Microsoft Entra Gallery app

Where to enable

Entra admin center → Enterprise applications → Paycom → Single sign-on

No native Entra SCIM connector. Use RoboMQ Hire2Retire or Aquera Paycom Sync Bridge for AD/Entra ID provisioning.

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
Paycom

Paycom doesn't offer SCIM. Get an enterprise-grade SCIM endpoint in your IdP, even without native support.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Paycom logo
Paycom
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Paychex logo

Paychex

No SCIM

HR / Payroll

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Paychex Flex, the HR and payroll platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Paychex provides SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers, this creates an unusual challenge: as an HR system, Paychex is typically the source of employee data that provisions other applications, not the destination. However, for organizations using Paychex alongside other IdP-managed applications, manual user management becomes necessary. Okta does offer a provisioning connector with Schema Discovery and Attribute Writeback capabilities, but this requires Okta Enterprise and doesn't address integration with other identity providers. This positioning creates a gap for IT teams managing hybrid identity environments. When Paychex serves as your HR system of record but you need to provision users into Paychex from your primary IdP (perhaps for contractor access or cross-system synchronization), you're forced into manual processes or expensive third-party middleware solutions like RoboMQ Hire2Retire. The lack of standardized SCIM support means each IdP integration requires custom configuration and ongoing maintenance.

View full guide
Gusto logo

Gusto

No SCIM

HR / Payroll

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Gusto, the HR and payroll platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan—it only offers Just-In-Time (JIT) provisioning through SAML SSO. While JIT creates user accounts on first login, it provides no automated deprovisioning capabilities when employees leave or change roles. This creates a significant compliance gap: terminated employees retain access to sensitive payroll and benefits data until manually removed. Making matters worse, SAML SSO must be activated by contacting Gusto support, adding friction to the setup process. The lack of automated deprovisioning is particularly problematic for HR platforms like Gusto, which contain highly sensitive employee data including Social Security numbers, bank account details, and salary information. Without SCIM, IT teams must manually track employee departures and remember to deactivate Gusto accounts—a process that's error-prone and creates regulatory compliance risks under SOX, GDPR, and other frameworks requiring timely access revocation.

View full guide
Paylocity logo

Paylocity

SCIM Tax

HR / Payroll

SCIM StatusIncluded
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Paylocity offers native SCIM provisioning that's included with all plans starting at $22-32/employee/month. The implementation is solid for an HR platform—supporting user creation, attribute updates, and deactivation across major identity providers like Okta, Entra, and OneLogin. However, there are operational friction points that complicate deployment: SCIM usernames are restricted to 8-20 characters, users must have both username and work email populated in the HR module before provisioning works, and Okta customers must contact Paylocity support directly to enable SAML 2.0 before SCIM can function. These seemingly minor requirements create real deployment headaches. The username length restriction can break existing naming conventions, the HR module data prerequisite means provisioning fails silently if employee records aren't properly configured, and the Okta support dependency adds weeks to what should be a straightforward integration. For IT teams managing multiple provisioning integrations, these platform-specific quirks multiply administrative overhead.

View full guide