Stitchflow
Procore logo

Procore SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Procore user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Procore, the construction management platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Procore offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—all users must still be manually created in Procore's Directory tool before they can authenticate via SSO. This creates a significant operational burden for construction companies managing large, distributed workforces across multiple job sites and projects.

The lack of automated provisioning becomes particularly problematic in construction environments where teams frequently change based on project phases, contractor assignments, and seasonal workforce fluctuations. Without SCIM, IT teams must manually onboard and offboard workers, subcontractors, architects, and project managers—a time-intensive process that increases security risks and compliance gaps when employees retain access to project data after role changes or project completion.

The strategic alternative

Procore has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOProvisioningNotes
OktaVia APIAPI connector
Microsoft Entra IDAPI connector
Google WorkspaceSSO only, no provisioning
OneLoginSSO only

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Procore accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Procore pricing problem

Procore gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
StarterFrom $375/mo (ACV-based)
Enterprise$4,500-$25,000+/yr (ACV-based)

Pricing and provisioning options

PlanPricingSCIMSSO
StarterFrom $375/mo (ACV-based)❌ No SCIM✓ SAML 2.0
Enterprise$4,500-$25,000+/yr (ACV-based)❌ No SCIM✓ SAML 2.0

Key constraint: Users must be manually created in Procore's Directory tool before they can use SSO. There's no just-in-time provisioning or automated account creation.

What this means in practice

For construction companies, this creates several operational challenges:

High-volume onboarding
Construction projects involve dozens to hundreds of workers, subcontractors, and vendors who need rapid access
Project-based turnover
Workers frequently join and leave projects, requiring constant manual account management
Multi-site coordination
Field teams across different job sites need timely provisioning without IT bottlenecks

Real-world impact: A general contractor managing 10 active projects with 50+ workers each would need to manually provision 500+ accounts, then manually deprovision them as projects complete.

Additional constraints

Third-party dependency
Okta users can leverage Aquera's connector for automated provisioning, but this requires additional vendor relationships and costs
No JIT provisioning
Unlike many SaaS apps, Procore requires pre-existing accounts for SSO to work
Custom pricing opacity
ACV-based pricing requires sales conversations, making it difficult to budget for larger deployments
Manual lifecycle management
Employee departures, role changes, and project transfers all require manual updates in multiple systems

Summary of challenges

  • Procore does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Procore actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (All plans)

Procore supports SAML 2.0 integration with identity providers:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, generic SAML
InitiationBoth SP-initiated and IdP-initiated
User requirementAccounts must exist in Directory before SSO login

Critical limitation: Procore's SSO requires pre-existing user accounts. Users must be manually created in the Directory tool before they can authenticate via SSO.

Third-party provisioning options

Since Procore lacks native SCIM, several third-party solutions exist:

ProviderMethodCoverage
Aquera connectorAPI-based syncUser creation, updates, deactivation
Okta integrationLimited APIBasic user management via OIN app
Custom API scriptsProcore APIRequires development resources

The reality: These third-party solutions add complexity, additional licensing costs, and another vendor relationship to manage. None provide the seamless automation that native SCIM delivers.

What's missing

For construction teams managing distributed workforces across multiple job sites, Procore's manual provisioning creates significant operational overhead:

No automated user lifecycle management
Manual creation required for high-turnover contractor teams
No group-based access provisioning for project teams
Risk of orphaned accounts when contractors leave projects

The unlimited user model helps with seat costs but doesn't solve the fundamental automation gap.

What IT admins are saying

Community sentiment on Procore's user management reflects frustration with manual processes that don't scale for construction teams:

  • No SCIM support means every user must be manually created in the Directory tool
  • Pricing opacity requires sales conversations before understanding true costs
  • SSO authentication without automatic provisioning creates two-step onboarding
  • Large distributed workforces make manual user lifecycle management impractical

Users must exist in Directory before SSO login.

Procore support documentation

Do I need to create Procore user accounts if our company implements SSO? Yes, user accounts must be created in the Company Directory tool prior to SSO authentication.

Procore FAQ

The recurring theme

Construction companies love Procore's unlimited user model but hate that every project manager, contractor, and field worker must still be manually added to the system. With high turnover and project-based teams, IT admins spend significant time on basic user management instead of strategic work.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small construction team (<20 users)Manual management via Directory tool is workable
Single project with stable workforceManual provisioning acceptable for short-term needs
Multi-project contractor (50+ users)Use Stitchflow: automation essential for distributed teams
Large construction company with high turnoverUse Stitchflow: automation critical for lifecycle management
Enterprise with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automated audit trails required for SOX/governance

The bottom line

Procore's unlimited user model helps with cost predictability, but the complete lack of SCIM support creates operational headaches for larger construction companies managing distributed workforces across multiple job sites. For organizations that need automated provisioning without the manual overhead of managing field workers and contractors, Stitchflow delivers the automation Procore can't.

Make Procore workflows AI-native

Procore has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No native SCIM supportUsers must be created manually in Directory toolNo automatic provisioning with SSOCustom pricing requires sales contact

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No native SCIM support
  • Users must be created manually in Directory tool
  • No automatic provisioning with SSO
  • Custom pricing requires sales contact

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Procore → Sign On

Custom required for SCIM

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Configuration for Entra ID

Integration type

Microsoft Entra Gallery app

Where to enable

Entra admin center → Enterprise applications → Procore → Single sign-on

Custom required for SCIM

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
Procore

Procore has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Procore logo
Procore
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide