Stitchflow
Rancher logo

Rancher SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Rancher user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Rancher, SUSE's Kubernetes management platform, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan, including their Enterprise tier that starts at $7,594.99. While Rancher provides robust SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta, Azure AD, and others, this only handles authentication. User provisioning relies entirely on Just-in-Time (JIT) provisioning, which creates accounts during first login but provides no lifecycle management for deprovisioning or role updates. Additionally, group-based access control requires an OpenLDAP backend for group search functionality, adding infrastructure complexity.

This creates a significant operational gap for IT teams managing Kubernetes environments at scale. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees retain access to critical container orchestration infrastructure until manually removed. The lack of role synchronization means permission changes in your IdP don't automatically reflect in Rancher, creating compliance risks in environments where developers and platform engineers need dynamic access to different clusters and projects. Given Rancher's recent shift to CPU/vCPU-based pricing (causing 4-9x cost increases for some enterprises), these manual administrative overhead costs compound the already substantial platform investment.

The strategic alternative

Rancher has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?Yes
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaSAML SSO only. No SCIM provisioning. JIT provisioning available. Requires OpenLDAP for group search.
Microsoft Entra IDOAuth 2.0/OIDC authentication via Microsoft Graph API. No SCIM provisioning.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Rancher accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Rancher pricing problem

Rancher gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Community EditionFree
Rancher PrimeCustom (CPU/vCPU-based)
Enterprise$7,595 - $41,831/year

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Community EditionFree
Rancher PrimeCustom (CPU/vCPU-based)
Enterprise$7,595 - $41,831/year

Key pricing changes: SUSE shifted from node-based to CPU/vCPU-based pricing in 2025, causing 4-9x cost increases for some enterprises migrating from legacy pricing models.

What this means in practice

Without SCIM, IT teams managing Rancher face several operational challenges:

Manual user lifecycle management
All user creation, updates, and deactivation must be handled manually in Rancher's UI
No automated group sync
Team membership changes require manual updates in both your IdP and Rancher
JIT limitations
While JIT provisioning works for initial access, it doesn't handle role changes or deprovisioning
Audit trail gaps
User access changes aren't automatically logged or tied to HR system events

Additional constraints

OpenLDAP dependency
Group-based access control requires an OpenLDAP backend for group search functionality
Microsoft Graph API requirement
Azure AD integration requires Microsoft Graph API (the deprecated Azure AD Graph API is no longer supported)
No standardized provisioning
Each IdP integration has different capabilities and limitations
Limited role mapping
Complex role hierarchies must be managed manually rather than synced from your IdP

Summary of challenges

  • Rancher does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Rancher actually offers for identity

SAML 2.0 SSO (All Plans)

Rancher supports federated authentication through multiple identity providers:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0, OAuth 2.0/OIDC (Azure AD)
Supported IdPsOkta, Azure AD, Ping, ADFS, Shibboleth, Keycloak, generic SAML
JIT Provisioning✓ Yes
Single Logout (SLO)✓ Yes
Group mappingRequires OpenLDAP backend for SAML

Key requirement: For SAML-based group mapping, you must configure an OpenLDAP backend to enable group search functionality. Azure AD integration uses Microsoft Graph API (the deprecated Azure AD Graph API is no longer supported).

What's Missing: SCIM Provisioning

Rancher's documentation contains no mention of SCIM provisioning capabilities:

FeatureSupported?
Create users❌ No (JIT only)
Update users❌ No
Deactivate users❌ No
Group provisioning❌ No
Automated lifecycle❌ No

Reality check: While Rancher handles SSO well, you're limited to just-in-time (JIT) provisioning. Users are created on first login, but there's no automated way to provision, update, or deprovision accounts. For Kubernetes platform management where access control is critical, this means manual user lifecycle management.

The OpenLDAP requirement for group mapping adds operational overhead—you need to maintain a separate directory service just to get proper group-based access controls working with SAML providers.

What IT admins are saying

Community sentiment on Rancher's provisioning capabilities reveals significant friction for IT teams managing Kubernetes environments at scale:

  • No SCIM provisioning support forces manual user management despite enterprise pricing
  • OpenLDAP backend requirement for group-based access adds unnecessary infrastructure complexity
  • Recent CPU/vCPU-based pricing changes caught enterprises off guard with massive cost increases
  • JIT provisioning helps with SSO but doesn't solve the broader automation gap

2025 CPU/vCPU-based pricing caused 4-9x cost increases for some enterprises

Community feedback on pricing model changes

OpenLDAP needed for group search in SAML

Rancher technical documentation highlighting infrastructure dependencies

The recurring theme

Rancher offers solid Kubernetes management and SAML SSO, but enterprises paying $7K+ annually still face manual provisioning workflows and unexpected infrastructure requirements that create operational overhead for IT teams.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small DevOps team (<10 users) on Community EditionManual management is acceptable
Mid-size platform team with stable membershipManual management with SAML SSO for authentication
Enterprise with complex RBAC requirementsUse Stitchflow: automated role mapping essential
Multi-cluster environments with dynamic teamsUse Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended
Organizations requiring audit complianceUse Stitchflow: automated provisioning trail required

The bottom line

Rancher is an excellent Kubernetes management platform, but it completely lacks SCIM provisioning capabilities. You're limited to SAML SSO with manual user management or JIT provisioning—neither option scales well for enterprise environments with complex role-based access controls. For organizations that need true provisioning automation across their Rancher deployments, Stitchflow is the only viable solution.

Make Rancher workflows AI-native

Rancher has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No SCIM provisioning documentedOpenLDAP needed for group search in SAMLSAML SLO supportedMicrosoft Graph API required for Azure AD (replaces deprecated Azure AD Graph API)

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No SCIM provisioning documented
  • OpenLDAP needed for group search in SAML
  • SAML SLO supported
  • Microsoft Graph API required for Azure AD (replaces deprecated Azure AD Graph API)

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Entra ID

Integration type

Microsoft Entra Gallery app

Prerequisite

SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.

Where to enable

Entra admin center → Enterprise applications → Rancher → Single sign-on

OAuth 2.0/OIDC authentication via Microsoft Graph API. No SCIM provisioning.

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
Rancher

Rancher has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Rancher logo
Rancher
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide