Stitchflow
SentinelOne logo

SentinelOne SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate SentinelOne user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

SentinelOne, the endpoint security platform, offers inconsistent SCIM provisioning support that varies significantly by identity provider. While Okta users get full SCIM 2.0 provisioning capabilities (including user creation, updates, and deactivation), other major IdPs like Entra ID lack documented SCIM support despite having SSO integration. This creates a problematic two-tier experience where your choice of identity provider directly impacts your ability to automate user lifecycle management. Making matters worse, SCIM provisioning requires SentinelOne's Enterprise tier with custom pricing—typically $30K-$110K annually for most organizations.

This IdP-dependent provisioning creates significant operational gaps for IT teams. Organizations using Entra ID, Google Workspace, or other non-Okta identity providers must manually provision and deprovision security team access to critical endpoint protection tools. For a platform protecting every endpoint in your organization, manual user management introduces both security risks (delayed deprovisioning) and compliance challenges (lack of automated audit trails). SSO alone doesn't solve this—users still need their accounts created, updated, and properly deactivated across security tools.

The strategic alternative

SentinelOne has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?Yes
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationOfficial docs

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaNo SCIM available
Microsoft Entra IDNo SCIM available
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages SentinelOne accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The SentinelOne pricing problem

SentinelOne gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Singularity Core$69/endpoint/year
Singularity Control$79/endpoint/year
Singularity Complete$179.99/endpoint/year
Singularity Commercial$229.99/endpoint/year
Singularity EnterpriseCustom quote

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Singularity Core$69/endpoint/year
Singularity Control$79/endpoint/year
Singularity Complete$179.99/endpoint/year
Singularity Commercial$229.99/endpoint/year
Singularity EnterpriseCustom quote

Market data on Enterprise tier costs

Typical annual spend
$30,000-$110,000 for mid-market deployments
Enterprise quotes often 2-3x the Commercial tier pricing
No published pricing creates procurement friction and extended sales cycles

What this means in practice

For a 500-endpoint deployment wanting SCIM:

Commercial tier
$114,995/year (known pricing)
Enterprise tier
$200,000+ estimated (requires custom quote)
Upgrade cost
$85,000+ annually just to access automated provisioning

Organizations face a brutal choice: accept manual user management at lower tiers, or pay premium enterprise pricing for basic SCIM functionality that competitors include in standard plans.

Additional constraints

IdP-specific SCIM support
Full SCIM only works with Okta; other IdPs have limited or no provisioning capabilities
Duo integration gap
SentinelOne's Duo SSO integration specifically excludes SCIM support
Sales-gated access
Enterprise tier requires going through SentinelOne's enterprise sales team with extended quote timelines
No JIT provisioning fallback
Lower tiers lack both SCIM and Just-in-Time provisioning, forcing manual account creation

Summary of challenges

  • SentinelOne does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What SentinelOne actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (All Plans)

SentinelOne provides SAML 2.0 authentication across all pricing tiers:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Entra, Google Workspace, OneLogin, Ping, CyberArk
ConfigurationSettings > SSO > Integrations in SentinelOne console
JIT Provisioning❌ No

SCIM Provisioning (Enterprise Only)

User provisioning capabilities depend heavily on your identity provider:

IdPSCIM SupportFeatures
Okta✓ Full SCIM 2.0Create users, update attributes, deactivate users, group linking
Entra❌ SSO onlyNo documented SCIM provisioning support
Google Workspace❌ SSO onlyCheck SentinelOne console for current support
OneLogin❌ SSO onlyCheck SentinelOne console for current support

Critical limitation: SentinelOne's SCIM support is inconsistent across identity providers. While Okta provides full provisioning capabilities through their OIN integration, other major IdPs like Entra only support SSO authentication.

What Enterprise Actually Includes

SentinelOne's Enterprise tier bundles SCIM with advanced threat detection features:

Identity features
SCIM provisioning (Okta only), advanced SAML configurations
Security features
Complete XDR platform, behavioral AI, threat hunting, custom policies
Operational features
24/7 SOC support, professional services, custom integrations

Reality check: If you only need SCIM provisioning, you're paying for a comprehensive enterprise security platform ($30K-110K annually) to get basic user management functionality that works reliably with just one identity provider.

What IT admins are saying

SentinelOne's IdP-dependent SCIM support creates inconsistency for IT teams managing multi-vendor identity environments:

  • SCIM provisioning only works with specific IdPs - primarily Okta with full support
  • Duo integration explicitly doesn't support SCIM, forcing manual user management
  • Microsoft Entra integration lacks documented SCIM provisioning capabilities
  • Teams must verify SCIM availability per IdP rather than having universal support

Duo integration does not support SCIM

Duo official documentation

SCIM support varies by IdP

SentinelOne integration notes

The recurring theme

While SentinelOne offers robust endpoint security, provisioning automation depends entirely on your IdP choice. Teams using Duo or Entra may find themselves manually managing user lifecycles despite paying Enterprise-tier pricing that can reach $100K+ annually for larger deployments.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small security team (<20 endpoints) with OktaUse native SCIM: built-in automation works well
Mixed IdP environment (Entra + others)Use Stitchflow: native support limited to Okta
Large enterprise (500+ endpoints)Use Stitchflow: scale demands reliable automation
Regulatory compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: audit trail essential for security tools
Multi-tenant SOC with contractor accessUse Stitchflow: complex provisioning needs automation

The bottom line

SentinelOne offers solid SCIM support through Okta, but other identity providers are left with manual provisioning for this critical security platform. For organizations that need consistent automation across all IdPs or want to avoid vendor lock-in, Stitchflow delivers enterprise-grade provisioning without the Okta dependency.

Make SentinelOne workflows AI-native

SentinelOne has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

Not specified

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • Duo integration does not support SCIM
  • SCIM support varies by IdP
  • Okta has full SCIM support

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Prerequisite

SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → SentinelOne → Sign On

Enterprise required for SCIM

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Configuration for Entra ID

Integration type

Microsoft Entra Gallery app

Prerequisite

SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.

Where to enable

Entra admin center → Enterprise applications → SentinelOne → Single sign-on

Enterprise required for SCIM

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
SentinelOne

SentinelOne has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
SentinelOne logo
SentinelOne
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
Aha! logo

Aha!

No SCIM

Product Management / Roadmapping

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Aha! Roadmaps, the product roadmapping platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Aha! offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta, Entra ID, and OneLogin, this only handles authentication through JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning. The critical limitation: JIT provisioning creates user accounts with no default role or access permissions, requiring administrators to manually configure access for each user after they first sign in. For product teams managing strategic roadmaps and stakeholder access, this creates significant operational overhead. Since product roadmaps contain sensitive strategic information and stakeholder access typically varies by product area, IT administrators must manually assign appropriate roles and workspace permissions after each user is provisioned. There's no automatic deprovisioning when users leave the organization, creating potential security gaps. This manual process becomes particularly problematic for larger product organizations where dozens of stakeholders across different business units need carefully managed access to specific roadmaps.

View full guide
Appcues logo

Appcues

No SCIM

Product Adoption / User Onboarding

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Appcues, the product adoption platform used by product managers and growth teams, explicitly does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan—not even Enterprise. While Appcues offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration starting at the Enterprise tier with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates users during first login and provides no automated deprovisioning capabilities. For product teams where access needs change frequently as people move between projects or leave the company, this creates a significant security gap. The lack of SCIM means IT teams must manually manage user lifecycle for Appcues accounts, even though the platform handles sensitive product analytics and user flow data. When employees leave or change roles, their Appcues access remains active until manually revoked—a compliance risk that's particularly problematic given Appcues' role in tracking user behavior and product metrics. With MAU-based pricing starting at $300/month and scaling significantly with usage, paying for orphaned accounts also creates unnecessary cost bloat.

View full guide