Summary and recommendation
SentinelOne, the endpoint security platform, offers inconsistent SCIM provisioning support that varies significantly by identity provider. While Okta users get full SCIM 2.0 provisioning capabilities (including user creation, updates, and deactivation), other major IdPs like Entra ID lack documented SCIM support despite having SSO integration. This creates a problematic two-tier experience where your choice of identity provider directly impacts your ability to automate user lifecycle management. Making matters worse, SCIM provisioning requires SentinelOne's Enterprise tier with custom pricing—typically $30K-$110K annually for most organizations.
This IdP-dependent provisioning creates significant operational gaps for IT teams. Organizations using Entra ID, Google Workspace, or other non-Okta identity providers must manually provision and deprovision security team access to critical endpoint protection tools. For a platform protecting every endpoint in your organization, manual user management introduces both security risks (delayed deprovisioning) and compliance challenges (lack of automated audit trails). SSO alone doesn't solve this—users still need their accounts created, updated, and properly deactivated across security tools.
The strategic alternative
SentinelOne has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.
Quick SCIM facts
| SCIM available? | No |
| SCIM tier required | N/A |
| SSO required first? | Yes |
| SSO available? | Yes |
| SSO protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Documentation | Official docs |
Supported identity providers
| IdP | SSO | SCIM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta | ✓ | ❌ | No SCIM available |
| Microsoft Entra ID | ✓ | ❌ | No SCIM available |
| Google Workspace | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
| OneLogin | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
The cost of not automating
Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages SentinelOne accounts manually. Here's what that costs:
The SentinelOne pricing problem
SentinelOne gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.
Tier comparison
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singularity Core | $69/endpoint/year | ||
| Singularity Control | $79/endpoint/year | ||
| Singularity Complete | $179.99/endpoint/year | ||
| Singularity Commercial | $229.99/endpoint/year | ||
| Singularity Enterprise | Custom quote |
Pricing structure
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singularity Core | $69/endpoint/year | ||
| Singularity Control | $79/endpoint/year | ||
| Singularity Complete | $179.99/endpoint/year | ||
| Singularity Commercial | $229.99/endpoint/year | ||
| Singularity Enterprise | Custom quote |
Market data on Enterprise tier costs
What this means in practice
For a 500-endpoint deployment wanting SCIM:
Organizations face a brutal choice: accept manual user management at lower tiers, or pay premium enterprise pricing for basic SCIM functionality that competitors include in standard plans.
Additional constraints
Summary of challenges
- SentinelOne does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
- Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
- Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually
What SentinelOne actually offers for identity
SAML SSO (All Plans)
SentinelOne provides SAML 2.0 authentication across all pricing tiers:
| Setting | Details |
|---|---|
| Protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Supported IdPs | Okta, Entra, Google Workspace, OneLogin, Ping, CyberArk |
| Configuration | Settings > SSO > Integrations in SentinelOne console |
| JIT Provisioning | ❌ No |
SCIM Provisioning (Enterprise Only)
User provisioning capabilities depend heavily on your identity provider:
| IdP | SCIM Support | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Okta | ✓ Full SCIM 2.0 | Create users, update attributes, deactivate users, group linking |
| Entra | ❌ SSO only | No documented SCIM provisioning support |
| Google Workspace | ❌ SSO only | Check SentinelOne console for current support |
| OneLogin | ❌ SSO only | Check SentinelOne console for current support |
Critical limitation: SentinelOne's SCIM support is inconsistent across identity providers. While Okta provides full provisioning capabilities through their OIN integration, other major IdPs like Entra only support SSO authentication.
What Enterprise Actually Includes
SentinelOne's Enterprise tier bundles SCIM with advanced threat detection features:
Reality check: If you only need SCIM provisioning, you're paying for a comprehensive enterprise security platform ($30K-110K annually) to get basic user management functionality that works reliably with just one identity provider.
What IT admins are saying
SentinelOne's IdP-dependent SCIM support creates inconsistency for IT teams managing multi-vendor identity environments:
- SCIM provisioning only works with specific IdPs - primarily Okta with full support
- Duo integration explicitly doesn't support SCIM, forcing manual user management
- Microsoft Entra integration lacks documented SCIM provisioning capabilities
- Teams must verify SCIM availability per IdP rather than having universal support
Duo integration does not support SCIM
SCIM support varies by IdP
The recurring theme
While SentinelOne offers robust endpoint security, provisioning automation depends entirely on your IdP choice. Teams using Duo or Entra may find themselves manually managing user lifecycles despite paying Enterprise-tier pricing that can reach $100K+ annually for larger deployments.
The decision
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Small security team (<20 endpoints) with Okta | Use native SCIM: built-in automation works well |
| Mixed IdP environment (Entra + others) | Use Stitchflow: native support limited to Okta |
| Large enterprise (500+ endpoints) | Use Stitchflow: scale demands reliable automation |
| Regulatory compliance requirements | Use Stitchflow: audit trail essential for security tools |
| Multi-tenant SOC with contractor access | Use Stitchflow: complex provisioning needs automation |
The bottom line
SentinelOne offers solid SCIM support through Okta, but other identity providers are left with manual provisioning for this critical security platform. For organizations that need consistent automation across all IdPs or want to avoid vendor lock-in, Stitchflow delivers enterprise-grade provisioning without the Okta dependency.
Make SentinelOne workflows AI-native
SentinelOne has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.
Technical specifications
SCIM Version
Not specifiedSupported Operations
Not specifiedSupported Attributes
Not specifiedPlan requirement
Not specifiedPrerequisites
Not specifiedKey limitations
- Duo integration does not support SCIM
- SCIM support varies by IdP
- Okta has full SCIM support
Configuration for Okta
Integration type
Okta Integration Network (OIN) app
Prerequisite
SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.
Where to enable
Enterprise required for SCIM
Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.
Configuration for Entra ID
Integration type
Microsoft Entra Gallery app
Prerequisite
SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.
Where to enable
Enterprise required for SCIM
Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.
Unlock SCIM for
SentinelOne
SentinelOne has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.
See how it works


