Stitchflow
SignNow logo

SignNow SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate SignNow user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

SignNow (airSlate) does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan, despite pricing their Enterprise tier at $50/user/month. While SignNow provides SAML 2.0 SSO on Enterprise plans and Okta has built a custom API-based provisioning connector, this creates a fragmented approach where provisioning capabilities depend entirely on your identity provider. Organizations using Entra ID, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management, while Okta customers get limited API provisioning that lacks the standardization and reliability of SCIM.

This creates significant operational overhead for IT teams managing e-signature workflows across legal, sales, and HR departments. Manual provisioning becomes particularly problematic when SignNow access needs to be managed for contract signing workflows or when employees need immediate access for time-sensitive document approvals. The lack of standardized SCIM also means no consistent deprovisioning when employees leave, creating potential security gaps in document access controls.

The strategic alternative

SignNow has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOProvisioningNotes
OktaVia APIOkta integration supports Create, Update, Deactivate, Sync Password, Attribute Sourcing, Schema Discovery. Uses API provisioning not SCIM.
Microsoft Entra IDAzure AD SAML SSO documented. SCIM provisioning not available.
Google WorkspaceSSO only, no provisioning
OneLoginSSO only

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages SignNow accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The SignNow pricing problem

SignNow gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Business$8/user/mo (annual)
Business Premium$15/user/mo (annual)
Enterprise$50/user/mo

Pricing and provisioning availability

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Business$8/user/mo (annual)
Business Premium$15/user/mo (annual)
Enterprise$50/user/mo

Cost impact: Moving from Business Premium to Enterprise purely for SSO represents a 233% price increase per user. For a 100-person organization, this jumps from $1,500/month to $5,000/month.

What this means in practice

Without SCIM, IT teams face significant operational overhead:

Manual account creation
Every new hire requires individual account setup in SignNow
No automated deprovisioning
Departing employees must be manually removed, creating security risks
Role management complexity
Permission changes require manual updates across both IdP and SignNow
Audit challenges
No centralized visibility into who has access or what permissions they hold

Additional constraints

Limited IdP support for API provisioning
Only Okta provides API-based provisioning integration - Entra ID, Google Workspace, and OneLogin users have no automation options
Enterprise-only SSO
Even basic SAML SSO requires the highest-tier plan, making automation expensive for smaller teams
API reliability concerns
Okta's API-based provisioning depends on third-party maintenance and may not support all SCIM features like group mapping
Documentation gaps
SignNow doesn't publicly document their provisioning APIs, making troubleshooting difficult

Summary of challenges

  • SignNow does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What SignNow actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Enterprise only)

SignNow supports SAML 2.0 integration on their Enterprise plan ($50/user/month):

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace
ConfigurationStandard SAML metadata exchange
User requirementManual account creation required

Critical limitation: SignNow's SAML SSO does not include just-in-time (JIT) provisioning. Users must be manually created in SignNow before they can authenticate via SSO.

Okta Integration (API-based provisioning)

The official Okta Integration Network listing for SignNow shows:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes
OIDC SSO❌ No
Create users✓ Yes (API-based)
Update users✓ Yes (API-based)
Deactivate users✓ Yes (API-based)
Sync passwords✓ Yes
Group push❌ No

The catch: This API-based provisioning only works with Okta and requires Enterprise pricing. If you use Azure AD, Google Workspace, or OneLogin, you're limited to manual user management.

What's missing

No native SCIM protocol
SignNow doesn't publish SCIM endpoints
No cross-platform provisioning
Only Okta gets automated user lifecycle management
No group-based access control
User permissions must be managed individually in SignNow
Enterprise plan requirement
SSO and provisioning locked behind $50/user/month pricing

For organizations needing consistent identity management across multiple IdPs, SignNow's current offerings fall short of modern SCIM standards.

What IT admins are saying

Community sentiment on SignNow's provisioning reveals a familiar pattern: strong e-signature capabilities undermined by manual user management overhead.

  • No documented SCIM support - Zero public documentation for automated provisioning
  • Enterprise-only SSO - Authentication capabilities locked behind $50/user/month pricing
  • Contact sales for provisioning - No self-service provisioning options available
  • Manual account creation required - Users must be individually created before SSO access

"SCIM not publicly documented" and "Contact sales for provisioning options" are the standard responses IT teams encounter when researching SignNow's automation capabilities.

The recurring theme

SignNow treats user provisioning as an enterprise sales conversation rather than a technical implementation. IT teams end up with a $50/user/month bill just to avoid manual account management - or they stick with cheaper plans and accept the operational overhead of manually provisioning every signature user.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small legal/sales team (<20 users)Manual management is acceptable with Enterprise plan
Growing organization with frequent contract signersUse Stitchflow: manual provisioning doesn't scale
Enterprise with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automation essential for audit trail
Multi-department document workflowsUse Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended
Using Okta with API provisioning needsConsider Stitchflow: simpler than managing custom API integration

The bottom line

SignNow offers robust e-signature capabilities but lacks native SCIM provisioning—only Okta provides API-based automation, and that requires technical setup. For organizations that need reliable provisioning automation across any IdP without the complexity of custom API integrations, Stitchflow delivers the managed solution.

Make SignNow workflows AI-native

SignNow has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

SCIM not publicly documentedSSO on Enterprise Portal onlyContact sales for provisioning options

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • SCIM not publicly documented
  • SSO on Enterprise Portal only
  • Contact sales for provisioning options

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → SignNow → Sign On

Okta integration supports Create, Update, Deactivate, Sync Password, Attribute Sourcing, Schema Discovery. Uses API provisioning not SCIM.

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Configuration for Entra ID

Integration type

Microsoft Entra Gallery app

Where to enable

Entra admin center → Enterprise applications → SignNow → Single sign-on

Azure AD SAML SSO documented. SCIM provisioning not available.

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
SignNow

SignNow has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
SignNow logo
SignNow
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide