Stitchflow
Spinnaker logo

Spinnaker SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Spinnaker user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Spinnaker, the open source continuous delivery platform originally developed by Netflix, does not support SCIM provisioning in any configuration. As a self-hosted solution, Spinnaker relies entirely on local identity management rather than SaaS-style automated provisioning. While Spinnaker supports SAML 2.0, OAuth, and LDAP authentication through identity providers like Okta and Azure AD, user accounts must still be manually managed within the platform itself. Authorization can be handled through Okta groups or local roles.yml configuration, but the initial user provisioning and ongoing lifecycle management remains a manual process.

This creates a significant operational burden for DevOps and platform engineering teams managing Spinnaker deployments at scale. Without SCIM automation, IT administrators must manually create accounts for every developer and engineer who needs access to deployment pipelines—a time-intensive process that becomes increasingly problematic as engineering teams grow. The lack of automated deprovisioning also creates security risks when team members leave or change roles, as their Spinnaker access may remain active longer than intended.

The strategic alternative

Spinnaker has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0 / OAuth / LDAP
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaSAML SSO supported with manual configuration. No SCIM provisioning. Use Okta groups for authorization/RBAC.
Microsoft Entra IDSAML/OAuth SSO can be configured. No SCIM provisioning for self-hosted platform.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Spinnaker accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Spinnaker pricing problem

Spinnaker gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Open SourceFree (self-hosted)
Enterprise (OpsMx/Armory)Custom quote

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSCIM
Open SourceFree (self-hosted)❌ Not available
Enterprise (OpsMx/Armory)Custom quote❌ Not available

What this means in practice

Without SCIM provisioning, IT admins must:

Manually create and delete user accounts
in each Spinnaker instance
Synchronize group memberships
between your IdP and Spinnaker's local RBAC system
Handle offboarding manually
deprovisioned users in Okta/Entra remain active in Spinnaker until manually removed
Manage multiple authorization sources
Okta groups for SSO, plus local roles.yml configuration

The self-hosted nature compounds these challenges. Unlike SaaS applications where vendors can add SCIM support, Spinnaker requires your team to build and maintain any automation.

Additional constraints

No vendor-managed updates
SCIM integration would require custom development by your team
Infrastructure dependency
provisioning automation must be built into your Spinnaker deployment pipeline
Limited enterprise support
third-party vendors (OpsMx, Armory) focus on platform features, not identity automation
Security compliance gaps
manual user lifecycle management creates audit trail challenges for SOC 2/SOX compliance

Summary of challenges

  • Spinnaker does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Spinnaker actually offers for identity

SAML/OAuth SSO (Self-hosted configuration)

Spinnaker supports multiple authentication methods for self-hosted deployments:

ProtocolSupport
SAML 2.0✓ Yes
OAuth✓ Yes
LDAP✓ Yes
X.509✓ Yes
GitHub Teams✓ Yes
Azure Groups✓ Yes

The reality: This is a self-hosted open source platform, not a SaaS application. You configure authentication directly in your Spinnaker instance using YAML files and environment variables.

Authorization via External Groups

Spinnaker can map IdP groups to application permissions:

Okta groups
→ Spinnaker roles
Azure AD groups
→ Spinnaker roles
Google Workspace groups
→ Spinnaker roles
Manual roles.yml
→ Local role definitions

Users authenticate via SAML/OAuth, but authorization happens through group membership evaluation at login time.

What's completely missing

FeatureAvailable?
SCIM provisioning❌ No
JIT user creation❌ No
Automated deprovisioning❌ No
SaaS-style user management❌ No

The fundamental issue: Spinnaker is open source continuous delivery software that you host yourself. There's no vendor-managed identity system because there's no vendor-managed service. You're responsible for all user lifecycle management through your own processes and tooling.

Enterprise support from OpsMx or Armory doesn't change this - they provide commercial support and additional features, but Spinnaker remains a self-hosted platform without centralized identity management.

What IT admins are saying

Spinnaker's open-source nature means IT teams face the full burden of identity management for their continuous delivery platform:

  • No automated user provisioning - all account management is manual
  • Self-hosted identity stores require ongoing maintenance and security updates
  • RBAC relies on external group mappings that can drift out of sync
  • No centralized audit trail for user access across the deployment pipeline

Spinnaker is open source - self-hosted with local identity management. Use Okta groups for RBAC.

Armory documentation

Authorization via Okta groups or roles.yml

Community implementation notes

The recurring theme

While Spinnaker offers powerful continuous delivery capabilities, IT teams must build and maintain their own identity infrastructure. Every user change requires manual intervention, and there's no SaaS-style provisioning to automate the DevOps team's access lifecycle.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small DevOps team (<10 engineers)Manual management with SSO authentication
Self-hosted with dedicated platform teamManual management: you already handle infrastructure
Enterprise with 50+ developersUse Stitchflow: automation essential for scale
Multi-environment deployments with role complexityUse Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended
Compliance requirements needing audit trailsUse Stitchflow: automation essential for governance

The bottom line

Spinnaker is a powerful open-source continuous delivery platform, but as a self-hosted solution, it has no SCIM provisioning capabilities—only SAML/OAuth SSO with manual user management. For enterprises running Spinnaker at scale who need automated provisioning and proper audit trails, Stitchflow bridges the gap between your IdP and your CD platform.

Make Spinnaker workflows AI-native

Spinnaker has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

Open source - self-hostedNo SCIM provisioningSupports OAuth, SAML, LDAP, X.509Authorization via Okta groups or roles.yml

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • Open source - self-hosted
  • No SCIM provisioning
  • Supports OAuth, SAML, LDAP, X.509
  • Authorization via Okta groups or roles.yml

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Spinnaker

Spinnaker has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Spinnaker logo
Spinnaker
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide