Stitchflow
Sysdig logo

Sysdig SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Sysdig user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM not available

Summary and recommendation

Sysdig, the cloud security platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Sysdig offers SAML SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, their Okta integration is primarily designed for sending Okta security events to Sysdig for threat detection rather than user lifecycle management. IT teams can authenticate users through SSO, but must manually create and deactivate user accounts in Sysdig's interface—a significant operational burden for security platforms that typically require frequent access changes as team members join projects or change roles.

This creates a problematic gap for security operations. Unlike general business applications, security platforms like Sysdig often require rapid provisioning and deprovisioning as incident response teams scale up during security events or as developers rotate through different projects. Manual user management introduces delays in critical security workflows and increases the risk of orphaned accounts with excessive privileges—exactly the security risks these platforms are designed to prevent.

The strategic alternative

Sysdig has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaSysdig integration with Okta focuses on sending Okta events to Sysdig for threat detection via Falco rules. Supports SAML and SWA for SSO. Group Push, Group Linking, and Schema Discovery are available but for directory sync, not full user provisioning (create/deactivate).
Microsoft Entra IDSysdig supports SSO. No Entra SCIM provisioning tutorial found.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Sysdig accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Sysdig pricing problem

Sysdig gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
EnterpriseCustom (~$20+/host/month)

Pricing structure

PlanPricingSCIMSSO
EnterpriseCustom (~$20+/host/month)❌ Not available✓ SAML/SWA

Key pricing considerations

Host-based pricing model scales with infrastructure, not users
Custom enterprise pricing required for SSO access
No publicly available pricing for smaller deployments

What this means in practice

Without SCIM provisioning, IT teams face manual overhead for every user lifecycle event:

New hires
Manual account creation in Sysdig console after SSO setup
Role changes
Manual permission updates across security monitoring dashboards
Departures
Manual account deactivation with potential security exposure gaps
Bulk operations
No API or automation for managing multiple users simultaneously

For security-focused tools like Sysdig, manual deprovisioning creates compliance risks and potential data exposure.

Additional constraints

Infrastructure-based pricing
Costs scale with monitored hosts rather than users, making budget planning complex
Enterprise-only SSO
Smaller teams cannot access automated authentication without enterprise contracts
Security monitoring gaps
Manual user management creates windows where departed users retain access to sensitive security data
Compliance reporting
No automated user access reports for SOX, SOC 2, or other security audits

Summary of challenges

  • Sysdig does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Sysdig actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Enterprise plans)

Sysdig supports SAML 2.0 integration with identity providers on enterprise plans:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Entra ID, Google Workspace, custom SAML providers
ConfigurationStandard SAML metadata exchange
User requirementManual user creation still required

Critical limitation: Sysdig's SSO implementation doesn't create or manage user accounts. You must manually provision users in the Sysdig platform before they can authenticate via SSO.

Okta Integration (via OIN)

The official Okta Integration Network listing for Sysdig reveals a unique focus:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes
SWA (password vaulting)✓ Yes
Create users❌ No
Update users❌ No
Deactivate users❌ No
Event streaming to Sysdig✓ Yes (primary purpose)

The real story: Sysdig's Okta integration is primarily designed for security monitoring, not identity management. It streams Okta authentication events to Sysdig's Falco rules engine for threat detection—essentially using your identity provider as a security data source.

What's actually missing

Sysdig offers no automated user lifecycle management:

No user creation when someone joins your team
No automatic deactivation when employees leave
No role or group synchronization
No bulk user management capabilities

For a security platform where user access control is critical, this creates significant operational overhead and compliance risks.

What IT admins are saying

Sysdig's lack of automated user provisioning creates operational overhead for security teams managing cloud-native environments:

  • Manual user onboarding slows down developer access to critical security monitoring
  • No automated deprovisioning when team members leave, creating potential security gaps
  • SSO authentication exists but user accounts must still be created manually in Sysdig
  • Per-host pricing model makes cost management complex as infrastructure scales

You have to manually create every user account in Sysdig even though we have SSO set up. When someone joins the DevOps team, it's another manual step we have to remember.

IT Admin, Reddit

The Okta integration is really just for sending events to Sysdig for monitoring. It doesn't actually provision users automatically like we expected.

Security Engineer, GitHub Issues

The recurring theme

Even with enterprise-level security monitoring needs, teams must manually manage user lifecycle in Sysdig, creating friction in fast-moving development environments where automated access provisioning is critical for both security and productivity.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small security team (<10 users)Manual management is acceptable
Stable security operations with minimal turnoverManual management with SSO for authentication
Growing security team (15+ users)Use Stitchflow: automation essential for scalability
Enterprise with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automation essential for audit trail
Multi-cloud environments with frequent personnel changesUse Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended

The bottom line

Sysdig is a comprehensive cloud security platform, but it offers no SCIM provisioning capabilities whatsoever. While SSO integration exists for authentication, user lifecycle management remains entirely manual. For security teams that need automated provisioning to match their operational scale, Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level automation without the development overhead.

Make Sysdig workflows AI-native

Sysdig has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No full SCIM user provisioning (create/deactivate users)Okta integration primarily for sending events to Sysdig for security monitoringSSO via SAML or SWAPricing is per-host/per-month

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No full SCIM user provisioning (create/deactivate users)
  • Okta integration primarily for sending events to Sysdig for security monitoring
  • SSO via SAML or SWA
  • Pricing is per-host/per-month

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Sysdig → Sign On

Sysdig integration with Okta focuses on sending Okta events to Sysdig for threat detection via Falco rules. Supports SAML and SWA for SSO. Group Push, Group Linking, and Schema Discovery are available but for directory sync, not full user provisioning (create/deactivate).

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
Sysdig

Sysdig has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Sysdig logo
Sysdig
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Abnormal Security logo

Abnormal Security

No SCIM

Security / Email Security

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Abnormal Security, the AI-powered email security platform protecting against BEC and phishing attacks, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the platform supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not automated user lifecycle management. Security teams must manually provision and deprovision analyst access through Abnormal's portal, creating operational overhead and potential security gaps in a platform specifically designed to protect against email-based threats. This manual provisioning model creates significant challenges for security operations. When new SOC analysts join or existing team members change roles, IT admins must coordinate manual account creation and permission updates in Abnormal Security. For a platform that's critical to threat detection and incident response, delays in provisioning can leave security gaps, while delayed deprovisioning creates compliance risks. The irony is stark: a security platform designed to prevent account takeover and credential abuse lacks the automated provisioning controls that prevent exactly these risks.

View full guide
Airwallex logo

Airwallex

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Airwallex, the global payments and treasury platform, offers no SCIM provisioning support on any plan, including their custom Accelerate enterprise tier. Despite being positioned for enterprise use with features like multi-entity management and advanced treasury controls, Airwallex lacks any official identity provider integrations—no SSO, no provisioning, and no presence in major IdP galleries like Okta's OIN or Microsoft Entra. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing financial access across growing organizations, where manual user provisioning and deprovisioning in a payments platform presents both efficiency and security risks. The absence of identity management capabilities means IT administrators must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Airwallex—a particularly concerning gap given that this platform handles sensitive financial operations, cross-border payments, and treasury management. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees could retain access to financial systems, creating compliance risks and potential security vulnerabilities that most finance and IT teams cannot afford to overlook.

View full guide
Alkami logo

Alkami

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alkami, the digital banking platform used by banks and credit unions, does not offer SCIM provisioning or public SSO integrations. As an enterprise-only platform with custom pricing, Alkami appears to handle user management through direct account administration rather than standardized identity protocols. This creates significant challenges for financial institutions that need to integrate Alkami with their existing identity infrastructure—particularly problematic given the compliance requirements and security standards that banks must maintain. The lack of automated provisioning means IT teams at financial institutions must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Alkami. For a platform handling sensitive financial data and customer information, this manual approach introduces compliance risks and operational overhead. Banks typically require seamless integration between their core identity systems and all applications accessing customer data.

View full guide