Stitchflow
Teampay logo

Teampay SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Teampay user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Teampay, the spend management platform used by finance and procurement teams, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. Instead, Teampay relies on HR system integrations like BambooHR to sync user data, which creates a significant gap for IT teams managing identity governance. While Teampay supports SAML SSO through IdP connectors with Okta, Google Workspace, and OneLogin, this only handles authentication—not the automated provisioning and deprovisioning that IT teams need for compliance and security.

This HR integration approach is problematic because it bypasses your central identity provider entirely. When employees join, leave, or change roles, those updates must flow through HR systems rather than your IdP, creating delayed provisioning, orphaned accounts, and audit trail gaps. For a platform that manages company spending and procurement workflows, this creates real compliance risks around financial access controls.

The strategic alternative

Teampay has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolUnknown
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaNo SCIM available
Microsoft Entra IDVia third-partyNo SCIM available
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Teampay accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Teampay pricing problem

Teampay gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Standard~$18K/year (201-1000 employees)

Pricing structure

PlanPricingSCIMSSO
Standard~$18K/year (201-1000 employees)❌ Not available✓ SAML via connectors

Additional costs

Onboarding fee
$1,200 (sometimes waived)
Enterprise features require contacting sales (no public documentation)

What this means in practice

Without SCIM, you lose the core benefits of centralized identity management:

No automated provisioning
New hires must be manually added to Teampay after being created in your HR system
No automated deprovisioning
Terminated employees remain active in Teampay until manually removed
Dependency on HR integrations
User sync relies on third-party HR platforms rather than your authoritative IdP
Limited attribute mapping
Can't leverage custom attributes or group memberships from your IdP

Additional constraints

Undocumented enterprise features
SSO and provisioning details require sales contact - no public documentation available
HR system dependency
Must maintain separate integration with HR platforms for user lifecycle management
Limited IdP support
No documented support for Azure AD/Entra ID
Manual oversight required
IT teams must monitor multiple systems to ensure user access consistency

Summary of challenges

  • Teampay does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Teampay actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (via IdP connectors)

Teampay supports SAML-based single sign-on through identity provider connectors:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Google Workspace, OneLogin
ConfigurationVia IdP-specific connectors
DocumentationNot publicly available

Key gap: SSO and enterprise features aren't documented in Teampay's public materials. You need to contact their sales team for implementation details and requirements.

User Provisioning (HR integrations only)

Instead of SCIM, Teampay relies on HR system integrations for user lifecycle management:

FeatureMethod
Create usersHR integration (BambooHR, etc.)
Update usersHR integration sync
Deactivate usersHR integration sync
SCIM protocol❌ Not supported
Direct IdP provisioning❌ Not supported

Critical limitation: This HR-centric approach creates a three-system dependency (IdP → HRIS → Teampay) instead of the standard two-system SCIM flow (IdP → Teampay). Any sync delays or failures in your HR system directly impact Teampay access management.

The real problem

At ~$18K/year for mid-market deployments, Teampay's lack of native SCIM means you're paying enterprise software prices while being forced into a more complex, less reliable provisioning architecture than what modern SaaS apps typically provide.

What IT admins are saying

Teampay's lack of public documentation around provisioning creates uncertainty for IT teams evaluating the platform:

  • SSO and SCIM capabilities aren't publicly documented
  • Enterprise features require contacting sales for details
  • No clear provisioning workflow outside of HR system integrations
  • Limited transparency around identity management capabilities

SSO/SCIM not publicly documented

Multiple sources note the lack of available technical documentation

Contact vendor for enterprise features

Standard response when IT teams inquire about advanced identity features

The recurring theme

IT teams can't properly evaluate Teampay's identity capabilities without engaging sales, since the company doesn't publish technical specifications for SSO or user provisioning workflows.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small spend management team (<20 users)Manual management is workable
Finance team with low turnover and basic SSO needsUse SAML SSO with manual user management
Growing organization (50+ employees using Teampay)Use Stitchflow: automation essential for scale
Enterprise with distributed spend approval workflowsUse Stitchflow: automation critical for compliance
Multi-department spend managementUse Stitchflow: automation strongly recommended

The bottom line

Teampay focuses on spend management workflows but offers limited identity management options—no SCIM support and minimal public documentation on enterprise features. For organizations that need automated provisioning for their spend management platform, Stitchflow provides the missing automation layer that Teampay doesn't offer natively.

Make Teampay workflows AI-native

Teampay has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

SSO/SCIM not publicly documentedContact vendor for enterprise features

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • SSO/SCIM not publicly documented
  • Contact vendor for enterprise features

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Teampay → Sign On

Unknown required for SCIM

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
Teampay

Teampay has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Teampay logo
Teampay
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
Aha! logo

Aha!

No SCIM

Product Management / Roadmapping

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Aha! Roadmaps, the product roadmapping platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Aha! offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta, Entra ID, and OneLogin, this only handles authentication through JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning. The critical limitation: JIT provisioning creates user accounts with no default role or access permissions, requiring administrators to manually configure access for each user after they first sign in. For product teams managing strategic roadmaps and stakeholder access, this creates significant operational overhead. Since product roadmaps contain sensitive strategic information and stakeholder access typically varies by product area, IT administrators must manually assign appropriate roles and workspace permissions after each user is provisioned. There's no automatic deprovisioning when users leave the organization, creating potential security gaps. This manual process becomes particularly problematic for larger product organizations where dozens of stakeholders across different business units need carefully managed access to specific roadmaps.

View full guide
Appcues logo

Appcues

No SCIM

Product Adoption / User Onboarding

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Appcues, the product adoption platform used by product managers and growth teams, explicitly does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan—not even Enterprise. While Appcues offers SAML 2.0 SSO integration starting at the Enterprise tier with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates users during first login and provides no automated deprovisioning capabilities. For product teams where access needs change frequently as people move between projects or leave the company, this creates a significant security gap. The lack of SCIM means IT teams must manually manage user lifecycle for Appcues accounts, even though the platform handles sensitive product analytics and user flow data. When employees leave or change roles, their Appcues access remains active until manually revoked—a compliance risk that's particularly problematic given Appcues' role in tracking user behavior and product metrics. With MAU-based pricing starting at $300/month and scaling significantly with usage, paying for orphaned accounts also creates unnecessary cost bloat.

View full guide