Stitchflow
Tenable logo

Tenable SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Tenable user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM not available

Summary and recommendation

Tenable, the vulnerability management platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Tenable offers SAML SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Microsoft Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not user lifecycle management. All user provisioning must be done manually through Tenable's web interface, creating a significant operational burden for IT teams managing security tool access across large organizations.

This creates a critical gap in identity governance for one of your most security-sensitive applications. Without automated provisioning, IT teams must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Tenable, increasing the risk of orphaned accounts and compliance violations. For organizations running vulnerability assessments across hundreds or thousands of assets, manual user management becomes a scalability bottleneck that directly impacts security operations efficiency.

The strategic alternative

Tenable has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaSSO only via SAML
Microsoft Entra IDSSO via SAML only
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Tenable accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Tenable pricing problem

Tenable gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Pro$3,990/year (100 assets)
BusinessCustom quote
EnterpriseCustom quote

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Pro$3,990/year (100 assets)
BusinessCustom quote
EnterpriseCustom quote

What this means in practice

Manual provisioning workflow

1. New hire needs Tenable access 2. IT creates user account manually in Tenable console 3. User can then authenticate via SSO 4. When user leaves, IT must remember to deactivate Tenable access separately

Scale becomes unmanageable: Organizations with frequent hiring or role changes face constant manual overhead. A security tool that can't automate user lifecycle management creates operational risk - exactly what security teams want to avoid.

Compliance gaps: Without automated deprovisioning, terminated employees may retain access to vulnerability data and security dashboards longer than intended.

Additional constraints

No API alternative
Tenable's API doesn't provide user provisioning endpoints that could serve as a SCIM workaround
Asset-based pricing complexity
Pro tier's 100-asset limit makes capacity planning difficult when combined with manual user management
Security tool irony
A platform designed to identify security risks requires manual processes that create access control risks

Summary of challenges

  • Tenable does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Tenable actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Available on all plans)

Tenable supports SAML 2.0 integration with identity providers:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Microsoft Entra, Google Workspace, OneLogin
ConfigurationManual XML metadata exchange
User requirementManual user creation required before SSO login

Critical limitation: Users must be manually created in Tenable before they can authenticate via SSO. There's no automated provisioning or account creation.

Okta Integration (via OIN)

The official Okta Integration Network listing for Tenable shows:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes
OIDC SSO❌ No
Create users❌ No
Update users❌ No
Deactivate users❌ No
Group sync❌ No
Attribute mapping❌ No

Microsoft Entra Integration

Similar limitations exist with Entra ID:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes
User provisioning❌ No
Group assignments❌ No
Automated deprovisioning❌ No

Bottom line: Tenable offers SSO for authentication but zero provisioning capabilities. Every user addition, role change, and deactivation requires manual work in the Tenable console, regardless of your plan tier.

What IT admins are saying

Tenable's lack of automated user provisioning forces IT teams into manual workflows that don't scale:

  • Manual user creation required for every new employee
  • No automated deprovisioning when users leave the organization
  • Security team access must be managed separately from centralized identity systems
  • Time-consuming onboarding process for security personnel

We have SSO working but still have to manually create every user account in Tenable first. It defeats half the purpose of having centralized identity management.

IT Director, Reddit

The lack of SCIM means we're constantly playing catch-up with user lifecycle management. Someone leaves the company and we have to remember to manually remove them from Tenable too.

System Administrator, Spiceworks Community

The recurring theme

Even with SSO authentication, Tenable requires manual user lifecycle management that creates security gaps and administrative overhead for IT teams managing vulnerability management access.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small security team (<10 users) with low turnoverManual user management is acceptable
Mid-size organization (10-50 security users)Use Stitchflow: manual provisioning becomes time-consuming
Enterprise security operations (50+ users)Use Stitchflow: automation essential for operational efficiency
Organizations with strict compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automated audit trail and deprovisioning critical
Multi-team vulnerability management deploymentsUse Stitchflow: coordinating access across teams manually is unsustainable

The bottom line

Tenable provides enterprise-grade vulnerability management but offers zero provisioning automation—even on Enterprise plans, user management remains entirely manual. For security teams that need automated user lifecycle management without the operational overhead, Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning that scales with your security operations.

Make Tenable workflows AI-native

Tenable has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No SCIM support availableManual user provisioning requiredSSO available for authentication

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No SCIM support available
  • Manual user provisioning required
  • SSO available for authentication

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → Tenable → Sign On

SSO only via SAML

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Configuration for Entra ID

Integration type

Microsoft Entra Gallery app

Where to enable

Entra admin center → Enterprise applications → Tenable → Single sign-on

SSO via SAML only

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
Tenable

Tenable has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Tenable logo
Tenable
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Abnormal Security logo

Abnormal Security

No SCIM

Security / Email Security

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Abnormal Security, the AI-powered email security platform protecting against BEC and phishing attacks, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the platform supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not automated user lifecycle management. Security teams must manually provision and deprovision analyst access through Abnormal's portal, creating operational overhead and potential security gaps in a platform specifically designed to protect against email-based threats. This manual provisioning model creates significant challenges for security operations. When new SOC analysts join or existing team members change roles, IT admins must coordinate manual account creation and permission updates in Abnormal Security. For a platform that's critical to threat detection and incident response, delays in provisioning can leave security gaps, while delayed deprovisioning creates compliance risks. The irony is stark: a security platform designed to prevent account takeover and credential abuse lacks the automated provisioning controls that prevent exactly these risks.

View full guide
Airwallex logo

Airwallex

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Airwallex, the global payments and treasury platform, offers no SCIM provisioning support on any plan, including their custom Accelerate enterprise tier. Despite being positioned for enterprise use with features like multi-entity management and advanced treasury controls, Airwallex lacks any official identity provider integrations—no SSO, no provisioning, and no presence in major IdP galleries like Okta's OIN or Microsoft Entra. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing financial access across growing organizations, where manual user provisioning and deprovisioning in a payments platform presents both efficiency and security risks. The absence of identity management capabilities means IT administrators must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Airwallex—a particularly concerning gap given that this platform handles sensitive financial operations, cross-border payments, and treasury management. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees could retain access to financial systems, creating compliance risks and potential security vulnerabilities that most finance and IT teams cannot afford to overlook.

View full guide
Alkami logo

Alkami

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alkami, the digital banking platform used by banks and credit unions, does not offer SCIM provisioning or public SSO integrations. As an enterprise-only platform with custom pricing, Alkami appears to handle user management through direct account administration rather than standardized identity protocols. This creates significant challenges for financial institutions that need to integrate Alkami with their existing identity infrastructure—particularly problematic given the compliance requirements and security standards that banks must maintain. The lack of automated provisioning means IT teams at financial institutions must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Alkami. For a platform handling sensitive financial data and customer information, this manual approach introduces compliance risks and operational overhead. Banks typically require seamless integration between their core identity systems and all applications accessing customer data.

View full guide