Summary and recommendation
Tenable, the vulnerability management platform, does not support SCIM provisioning on any plan. While Tenable offers SAML SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Microsoft Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not user lifecycle management. All user provisioning must be done manually through Tenable's web interface, creating a significant operational burden for IT teams managing security tool access across large organizations.
This creates a critical gap in identity governance for one of your most security-sensitive applications. Without automated provisioning, IT teams must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Tenable, increasing the risk of orphaned accounts and compliance violations. For organizations running vulnerability assessments across hundreds or thousands of assets, manual user management becomes a scalability bottleneck that directly impacts security operations efficiency.
The strategic alternative
Tenable has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.
Quick SCIM facts
| SCIM available? | No |
| SCIM tier required | N/A |
| SSO required first? | No |
| SSO available? | Yes |
| SSO protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Documentation | Not available |
Supported identity providers
| IdP | SSO | SCIM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta | ✓ | ❌ | SSO only via SAML |
| Microsoft Entra ID | ✓ | ❌ | SSO via SAML only |
| Google Workspace | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
| OneLogin | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
The cost of not automating
Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Tenable accounts manually. Here's what that costs:
The Tenable pricing problem
Tenable gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.
Tier comparison
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro | $3,990/year (100 assets) | ||
| Business | Custom quote | ||
| Enterprise | Custom quote |
Pricing structure
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro | $3,990/year (100 assets) | ||
| Business | Custom quote | ||
| Enterprise | Custom quote |
What this means in practice
Manual provisioning workflow
1. New hire needs Tenable access 2. IT creates user account manually in Tenable console 3. User can then authenticate via SSO 4. When user leaves, IT must remember to deactivate Tenable access separately
Scale becomes unmanageable: Organizations with frequent hiring or role changes face constant manual overhead. A security tool that can't automate user lifecycle management creates operational risk - exactly what security teams want to avoid.
Compliance gaps: Without automated deprovisioning, terminated employees may retain access to vulnerability data and security dashboards longer than intended.
Additional constraints
Summary of challenges
- Tenable does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
- Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
- Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually
What Tenable actually offers for identity
SAML SSO (Available on all plans)
Tenable supports SAML 2.0 integration with identity providers:
| Setting | Details |
|---|---|
| Protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Supported IdPs | Okta, Microsoft Entra, Google Workspace, OneLogin |
| Configuration | Manual XML metadata exchange |
| User requirement | Manual user creation required before SSO login |
Critical limitation: Users must be manually created in Tenable before they can authenticate via SSO. There's no automated provisioning or account creation.
Okta Integration (via OIN)
The official Okta Integration Network listing for Tenable shows:
| Feature | Supported? |
|---|---|
| SAML SSO | ✓ Yes |
| OIDC SSO | ❌ No |
| Create users | ❌ No |
| Update users | ❌ No |
| Deactivate users | ❌ No |
| Group sync | ❌ No |
| Attribute mapping | ❌ No |
Microsoft Entra Integration
Similar limitations exist with Entra ID:
| Feature | Supported? |
|---|---|
| SAML SSO | ✓ Yes |
| User provisioning | ❌ No |
| Group assignments | ❌ No |
| Automated deprovisioning | ❌ No |
Bottom line: Tenable offers SSO for authentication but zero provisioning capabilities. Every user addition, role change, and deactivation requires manual work in the Tenable console, regardless of your plan tier.
What IT admins are saying
Tenable's lack of automated user provisioning forces IT teams into manual workflows that don't scale:
- Manual user creation required for every new employee
- No automated deprovisioning when users leave the organization
- Security team access must be managed separately from centralized identity systems
- Time-consuming onboarding process for security personnel
We have SSO working but still have to manually create every user account in Tenable first. It defeats half the purpose of having centralized identity management.
The lack of SCIM means we're constantly playing catch-up with user lifecycle management. Someone leaves the company and we have to remember to manually remove them from Tenable too.
The recurring theme
Even with SSO authentication, Tenable requires manual user lifecycle management that creates security gaps and administrative overhead for IT teams managing vulnerability management access.
The decision
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Small security team (<10 users) with low turnover | Manual user management is acceptable |
| Mid-size organization (10-50 security users) | Use Stitchflow: manual provisioning becomes time-consuming |
| Enterprise security operations (50+ users) | Use Stitchflow: automation essential for operational efficiency |
| Organizations with strict compliance requirements | Use Stitchflow: automated audit trail and deprovisioning critical |
| Multi-team vulnerability management deployments | Use Stitchflow: coordinating access across teams manually is unsustainable |
The bottom line
Tenable provides enterprise-grade vulnerability management but offers zero provisioning automation—even on Enterprise plans, user management remains entirely manual. For security teams that need automated user lifecycle management without the operational overhead, Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level provisioning that scales with your security operations.
Make Tenable workflows AI-native
Tenable has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.
Technical specifications
SCIM Version
Not specifiedSupported Operations
Not specifiedSupported Attributes
Plan requirement
Not specifiedPrerequisites
Not specifiedKey limitations
- No SCIM support available
- Manual user provisioning required
- SSO available for authentication
Documentation not available.
Configuration for Okta
Integration type
Okta Integration Network (OIN) app
Where to enable
Docs
SSO only via SAML
Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.
Configuration for Entra ID
Integration type
Microsoft Entra Gallery app
Where to enable
SSO via SAML only
Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.
Unlock SCIM for
Tenable
Tenable has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.
See how it works


