Stitchflow
Toast logo

Toast SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Toast user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

Toast POS does not offer SCIM provisioning or standard SSO integration for restaurant customers. As a restaurant-focused point-of-sale system, Toast uses a proprietary authentication system called "Toast Login" rather than supporting enterprise identity standards like SAML or SCIM. While Toast internally uses Okta for their own services, this integration is not exposed to customers. For multi-location restaurant groups or hospitality companies with centralized IT management, this creates significant operational challenges when trying to standardize identity management across their entire technology stack.

This lack of enterprise identity features means restaurant IT teams must manually manage user accounts across all locations, creating security risks when staff leave or transfer between locations. For restaurant chains with dozens or hundreds of locations, the administrative overhead of managing Toast accounts separately from their central identity provider represents both a compliance gap and operational inefficiency. The inability to automatically deprovision terminated employees from critical POS systems poses particular risks in the hospitality industry.

The strategic alternative

Toast has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolUnknown
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaVia third-partyNo Okta OIN integration for Toast POS. Toast uses internal Okta for their own services but not exposed to customers.
Microsoft Entra IDVia third-partyNo Azure AD/Entra integration documented for Toast POS.
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Toast accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The Toast pricing problem

Toast gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Starter Kit$0/mo (higher processing fees)
Point of SaleFrom $69/mo
Build Your OwnContact for pricing

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Starter Kit$0/mo (higher processing fees)
Point of SaleFrom $69/mo
Build Your OwnContact for pricing

Additional costs

Hardware terminals
$800-$1,000 per bundle
Handheld devices
~$600 each
Total monthly cost
$300-$700 for small restaurants, $1,000+ for full-service establishments
Add-ons (online ordering, delivery)
$75/mo each

What this means in practice

Toast operates more like specialized hardware than traditional SaaS. Restaurant staff typically log in using simple PIN codes or basic username/password combinations rather than enterprise identity systems. This creates several operational challenges:

Manual account management
Every user account must be created and managed directly in Toast's proprietary system
No centralized access control
IT teams cannot manage Toast access through their existing IdP policies
Inconsistent security posture
Toast users operate outside your standard security controls and MFA requirements
Audit complexity
User access logs and permissions exist in an isolated system

Additional constraints

Industry-specific design
Toast prioritizes restaurant workflow over enterprise identity integration
Proprietary authentication
No support for SAML, OIDC, or other standard protocols
Limited documentation
Enterprise identity features are not publicly documented, requiring direct vendor contact
Hardware dependency
User authentication is tied to physical POS terminals and restaurant-specific workflows
Processing integration
Identity management is secondary to payment processing and restaurant operations

Summary of challenges

  • Toast does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Toast actually offers for identity

Toast POS uses a proprietary authentication system called "Toast Login" and does not offer standard SAML SSO or SCIM provisioning for restaurant customers.

Proprietary Toast Login System

Toast's identity approach is built around their restaurant-focused model:

FeatureStatus
SAML SSO❌ Not documented for customers
SCIM provisioning❌ Not available
Third-party IdP support❌ No standard protocols
Toast Login accounts✓ Proprietary system only
Multi-location support✓ Via Toast management console

Key limitation: Toast appears to use Okta internally for their own services, but this integration is not exposed to restaurant customers. All user management happens through Toast's proprietary dashboard.

Enterprise Identity Features

Toast's enterprise documentation mentions identity capabilities, but specifics are not publicly available:

Custom user roles and permissions
Multi-location user management
Integration with Toast's payment processing requirements
Contact-only enterprise features

Translation: If you need SSO or automated provisioning for Toast POS, you'll need to contact their enterprise team directly. There's no self-service configuration or documented SAML/SCIM support like you'd find with typical SaaS applications.

This makes sense for a restaurant POS system where staff authentication is tied to payment processing compliance, but it creates challenges for IT teams managing corporate restaurant chains who need centralized identity management.

What IT admins are saying

Toast's lack of standard identity integration leaves IT teams managing restaurant technology without modern provisioning tools:

  • No documented SSO or SCIM support for restaurant customer accounts
  • Reliance on proprietary Toast Login system creates identity silos
  • Enterprise identity features require direct vendor contact with unclear capabilities
  • Restaurant POS systems often lag behind standard SaaS identity practices

SSO/SCIM not publicly documented for customer accounts... Contact vendor for enterprise identity features

Based on available Toast documentation

Uses proprietary Toast Login system... No standard SAML/SCIM for restaurant customers documented

Identity integration research findings

The recurring theme

Toast operates more like traditional restaurant software than modern SaaS, with limited public information about enterprise identity capabilities. IT teams managing multi-location restaurants must work directly with Toast sales to understand what identity features, if any, are available.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small restaurant (1-3 locations)Manual user management is acceptable
Single-location with stable staffManual management sufficient for most cases
Multi-location restaurant group (5+ locations)Use Stitchflow: automation essential for scale
Enterprise restaurant chain with compliance needsUse Stitchflow: automation required for audit trail
Restaurant group with high staff turnoverUse Stitchflow: manual provisioning becomes unmanageable

The bottom line

Toast POS uses a proprietary authentication system with no documented SCIM or standard SSO capabilities for restaurant customers. For restaurant groups that need automated user provisioning across multiple locations, Stitchflow provides the only viable automation solution.

Make Toast workflows AI-native

Toast has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

SSO/SCIM not publicly documented for customer accountsUses proprietary Toast Login systemContact vendor for enterprise identity features

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • SSO/SCIM not publicly documented for customer accounts
  • Uses proprietary Toast Login system
  • Contact vendor for enterprise identity features

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Toast

Toast has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Toast logo
Toast
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide