Stitchflow
TrustArc logo

TrustArc SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate TrustArc user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Summary and recommendation

TrustArc, the privacy management platform starting at $10,000/year, does not offer documented SCIM provisioning capabilities. While TrustArc supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with Okta and Azure AD, SCIM support is not publicly documented or available through standard integrations. The Okta integration only provides basic "Create" provisioning via SWA (Secure Web Authentication), which lacks the automated lifecycle management that true SCIM provides. For privacy and compliance teams that need to rapidly onboard and offboard users across legal, compliance, and privacy functions, this creates a significant operational burden.

This limitation is particularly problematic for organizations using TrustArc as their central privacy platform, where timely user access management is critical for compliance workflows and data protection activities. Without SCIM, IT teams must manually create, update, and deactivate user accounts - a process that introduces delays in compliance response times and increases the risk of orphaned accounts with access to sensitive privacy data and regulatory documentation.

The strategic alternative

TrustArc has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaNo SCIM available
Microsoft Entra IDNo SCIM available
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages TrustArc accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow aggregate data across apps with 2+ instances, normalized to 500 employees
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)7
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year101 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,925
IT labor cost/year$6,088
Cost of compliance misses/year$1,741
Total annual financial impact$11,754

The TrustArc pricing problem

TrustArc gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
EnterpriseStarting at $10,000/year

Pricing structure

PlanPricingSCIMSSO
EnterpriseStarting at $10,000/year❌ Not documented✓ SAML add-on

Market data on TrustArc costs

Average annual cost
~$22,000
Range
$10,000 - $137,000+ depending on modules
Enterprise-only pricing with custom quotes based on selected privacy modules

What this means in practice

Even at TrustArc's enterprise tier, you're paying $10,000+ annually but still managing user accounts manually:

No automated user creation
Privacy team members must be manually added to TrustArc
No group sync
Department changes require manual updates to user permissions
No automated deprovisioning
Departing employees retain access until manually removed
Okta workaround available
Limited "Create" provisioning via screen scraping (SWA method)

For a compliance platform handling sensitive privacy data, manual user management creates audit trail gaps and security risks.

Additional constraints

SCIM support unclear
Contact TrustArc directly to confirm current provisioning capabilities
SSO is an add-on
SAML SSO requires additional configuration and isn't included in base pricing
Limited IdP coverage
Only supports Okta and Azure AD for SSO; no Google Workspace or OneLogin integration
Okta dependency for automation
The only automated provisioning option requires Okta's SWA connector, which is unreliable for complex applications

Summary of challenges

  • TrustArc does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What TrustArc actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Enterprise add-on)

TrustArc supports SAML 2.0 integration as an additional solution on top of their privacy management platform:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Microsoft Entra ID, custom SAML providers
ConfigurationEnterprise-level setup required
Pricing requirementEnterprise plan (starting at $10,000/year)

Key limitation: SSO is positioned as an add-on feature, not core functionality, suggesting additional costs beyond the base Enterprise pricing.

Okta Integration (via OIN)

The official Okta Integration Network listing for TrustArc shows limited automation:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes
Create users✓ Yes (SWA-based)
Update users❌ No
Deactivate users❌ No
Group management❌ No
True SCIM protocol❌ No

Translation: Okta can create accounts via SWA (Secure Web Authentication), but this isn't true SCIM provisioning. It's password-based automation that lacks the reliability and feature set of proper SCIM.

Microsoft Entra ID Integration

No documented provisioning integration exists with Microsoft Entra ID. Organizations using Entra would be limited to SAML SSO only, with manual user management required.

The real problem

TrustArc's identity offerings reflect their position as a specialized privacy compliance platform rather than a collaboration tool. SCIM support isn't publicly documented, and the available automation (SWA-based provisioning through Okta) lacks the sophistication needed for enterprise user lifecycle management.

For a platform averaging $22,000/year and reaching up to $137,000 for larger deployments, the identity management capabilities are surprisingly basic.

What IT admins are saying

TrustArc's limited provisioning automation creates operational overhead for IT teams managing privacy compliance workflows:

  • Manual user management required despite enterprise-grade pricing starting at $10,000/year
  • SCIM documentation is not publicly available, forcing IT teams to contact sales for provisioning details
  • Limited identity provider support (Google Workspace and OneLogin not supported)
  • SSO requires additional configuration as an add-on rather than core functionality

SCIM not publicly documented

Based on vendor research findings

Contact vendor for enterprise features

Common requirement for provisioning setup

The recurring theme

Despite TrustArc's high-touch enterprise sales model and substantial annual costs, IT teams still face manual provisioning workflows and must engage directly with vendor support to understand automation capabilities, creating delays in onboarding legal and compliance team members.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small privacy team (<10 users)Manual management acceptable given limited SCIM options
Legal/compliance team with stable membershipManual management with SAML SSO for authentication
Growing privacy program (20+ users)Use Stitchflow: automation essential for scaling compliance
Enterprise with audit requirementsUse Stitchflow: automation critical for compliance documentation
Multi-module TrustArc deploymentUse Stitchflow: complex setups need reliable provisioning

The bottom line

TrustArc is a comprehensive privacy management platform, but its identity management capabilities are limited—SCIM isn't documented and SAML SSO is an add-on. For privacy teams that need reliable user provisioning without vendor uncertainty, Stitchflow provides the automation and compliance documentation that TrustArc can't deliver natively.

Make TrustArc workflows AI-native

TrustArc has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

SCIM not publicly documentedContact vendor for enterprise features

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • SCIM not publicly documented
  • Contact vendor for enterprise features

Documentation not available.

Configuration for Okta

Integration type

Okta Integration Network (OIN) app

Where to enable

Okta Admin Console → Applications → TrustArc → Sign On

Enterprise required for SCIM

Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.

Unlock SCIM for
TrustArc

TrustArc has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
TrustArc logo
TrustArc
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-11

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

6sense logo

6sense

No SCIM

B2B Revenue Intelligence / ABM

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

6sense, the B2B revenue intelligence platform, has paused SCIM provisioning for new customers until Q4 2026. While existing customers with SCIM enabled can continue using it, new implementations are limited to JIT (Just-In-Time) provisioning through SAML SSO. This creates a significant gap for IT teams managing revenue intelligence access, as JIT only creates users on first login and provides minimal attribute mapping (email, first name, last name only). For an enterprise platform with typical pricing of $55,000-$130,000 annually, the absence of automated user lifecycle management is a substantial limitation. The lack of SCIM until Q4 2026 forces IT teams into manual provisioning workflows for a platform handling sensitive revenue data. While SAML SSO handles authentication, it doesn't address user lifecycle events like role changes, department transfers, or offboarding. This creates compliance risks in revenue teams where access to prospect data and sales intelligence must be tightly controlled. The nearly two-year wait for SCIM restoration means organizations implementing 6sense today face manual user management for the foreseeable future.

View full guide
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

No SCIM

Marketing Automation / Email

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

ActiveCampaign, the marketing automation platform, does not offer native SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the Enterprise plan ($145+/month) includes SAML 2.0 SSO with just-in-time (JIT) provisioning, this only creates user accounts on first login—there's no automated deprovisioning when employees leave or change roles. New SSO users are automatically added to a generic "SSO Users" group with configurable permissions, but IT teams have no way to programmatically manage user lifecycles or enforce granular access controls based on department or role changes. This creates a significant gap for marketing teams that need to manage access to customer data and campaign tools. When employees leave the company or change departments, their ActiveCampaign access must be manually revoked, creating compliance risks and potential data exposure. The lack of automated deprovisioning means former employees could theoretically retain access to sensitive marketing data and customer information until someone manually removes them from the platform.

View full guide
Adyen logo

Adyen

No SCIM

Payments / Fintech

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$11,754/yr

Adyen offers SCIM 2.0 provisioning, but only through Okta's integration—there's no native SCIM endpoint. This creates a significant vendor lock-in scenario where your provisioning capabilities are entirely dependent on using Okta as your identity provider. Teams using Azure Entra, Google Workspace, or OneLogin are left with manual user management despite Adyen supporting SAML SSO with these platforms. The Okta integration itself requires maintaining a company account (not just a merchant account) and keeping at least one non-SSO admin for troubleshooting, adding operational complexity. For payment platforms handling sensitive financial data, this provisioning gap creates serious compliance risks. Your finance team, payment operations staff, and developers need timely access to process transactions and manage risk controls, but without automated provisioning, you're stuck with manual onboarding that can delay critical payment operations. The requirement to maintain non-SSO admin accounts also creates a security backdoor that compliance auditors will flag.

View full guide