Stitchflow
Userflow logo

Userflow SCIM guide

Connector Only

How to automate Userflow user provisioning, and what it actually costs

Native SCIM not available

Summary and recommendation

Userflow, the user onboarding and product adoption platform, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any of its plans—from the $240/month Startup tier to the $680/month Pro plan. While Userflow supports SAML-based SSO through custom integrations with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication, leaving user provisioning entirely manual. IT teams must individually create, update, and deactivate user accounts within Userflow's interface, creating a significant administrative burden as teams scale.

This manual provisioning model creates real operational challenges for IT departments. When new team members join or change roles, admins must remember to manually provision access to Userflow alongside dozens of other applications. More critically, when employees leave, failing to promptly deactivate their Userflow access leaves sensitive product analytics and user behavior data exposed—a compliance risk that grows more serious as your user base expands.

The strategic alternative

Userflow has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.

Quick SCIM facts

SCIM available?No
SCIM tier requiredN/A
SSO required first?No
SSO available?Yes
SSO protocolSAML 2.0
DocumentationNot available

Supported identity providers

IdPSSOSCIMNotes
OktaCustom SAML integration
Microsoft Entra IDCustom SAML integration
Google WorkspaceVia third-partyNo native support
OneLoginVia third-partyNo native support

The cost of not automating

Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages Userflow accounts manually. Here's what that costs:

Source: Stitchflow research, normalized to 500 employees:
Orphaned accounts (ex-employees with access)5
Unused licenses12
IT hours spent on manual management/year85 hours
Unused license cost/year$3,500
IT labor cost/year$5,100
Cost of compliance misses/year$890
Total annual financial impact$9,490

The Userflow pricing problem

Userflow gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.

Tier comparison

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Startup$240/mo
Pro$680/mo
EnterpriseCustom

Pricing structure

PlanPriceSSOSCIM
Startup$240/mo
Pro$680/mo
EnterpriseCustom

What this means in practice

Without SCIM support, IT teams face manual user lifecycle management:

New hire onboarding
Manual account creation for each user
Role changes
Manual permission updates in Userflow interface
Offboarding
Manual account deactivation (security risk if forgotten)
Bulk operations
No way to provision multiple users simultaneously
Audit compliance
No automated user sync for SOX/SOC requirements

Even Enterprise customers paying custom pricing get no relief from manual provisioning overhead.

Additional constraints

Custom SAML complexity
Integration requires technical setup and ongoing maintenance
No API automation
Limited programmatic options for bulk user management
Scaling friction
Manual processes become bottlenecks as teams grow
Security gaps
Risk of orphaned accounts when employees leave
No group sync
Team assignments must be managed separately in Userflow

Summary of challenges

  • Userflow does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
  • Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
  • Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually

What Userflow actually offers for identity

SAML SSO (Custom integration)

Userflow supports SAML 2.0 integration with identity providers through custom configuration:

SettingDetails
ProtocolSAML 2.0
Supported IdPsOkta, Entra ID, Google Workspace, custom SAML providers
ConfigurationManual setup required with IdP metadata
User requirementManual user creation still required

Critical limitation: Even with SSO configured, Userflow has no automated provisioning capabilities. Each user must be manually created in the platform before they can authenticate via SAML.

No Okta Integration Network listing

Userflow does not maintain an official integration in the Okta Integration Network, meaning:

FeatureSupported?
SAML SSO✓ Yes (custom setup)
OIDC SSO❌ No
SWA (password vaulting)❌ No
Create users❌ No
Update users❌ No
Deactivate users❌ No
Group push❌ No

No Microsoft Entra ID gallery app

Similarly, Userflow lacks a pre-configured application in the Microsoft Entra ID gallery, requiring manual SAML configuration for all Azure-based organizations.

Bottom line: Userflow offers basic SAML SSO but zero provisioning automation. IT teams managing user lifecycles across multiple customer success tools will face the same manual overhead regardless of which Userflow plan they choose.

What IT admins are saying

Userflow's lack of automated provisioning creates ongoing headaches for IT teams managing user access:

  • Manual user creation required for every new employee
  • No automated deprovisioning when team members leave
  • Time-consuming user management across growing teams
  • SSO available but still requires manual account setup

We have to manually create accounts in Userflow even though we have SSO set up. It's another system to remember when onboarding new hires.

IT Administrator, Reddit

The lack of SCIM means we're constantly playing catch-up with user management. When someone leaves, we have to remember to remove them from Userflow manually.

SysAdmin, IT community forum

The recurring theme

Even with SSO configured through custom SAML, IT teams must manually provision and deprovision every user account in Userflow. This creates security risks and administrative overhead as teams scale.

The decision

Your SituationRecommendation
Small product team (<10 users)Manual management is workable
Growing SaaS with frequent user changesUse Stitchflow: automation essential for scaling
Enterprise with compliance requirementsUse Stitchflow: automation required for audit trails
Multiple product teams needing Userflow accessUse Stitchflow: manual provisioning doesn't scale
High-security environment requiring SOC 2 complianceUse Stitchflow: meets enterprise security standards

The bottom line

Userflow offers powerful user onboarding capabilities but completely lacks SCIM provisioning—even at the Enterprise tier. With only manual user management available, growing teams face significant administrative overhead and compliance gaps. For organizations that need automated provisioning without the manual burden, Stitchflow delivers SCIM-level automation that scales with your team.

Make Userflow workflows AI-native

Userflow has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

Covers apps without native SCIM, including the ones without APIs
Less than a week, start to finish (~2 hours of your time)
Built with your team; extend to anything else in the company
Book a Demo

Technical specifications

SCIM Version

Not specified

Supported Operations

Not specified

Supported Attributes

No SCIM support availableManual user provisioning requiredSSO available via custom SAML

Plan requirement

Not specified

Prerequisites

Not specified

Key limitations

  • No SCIM support available
  • Manual user provisioning required
  • SSO available via custom SAML

Documentation not available.

Unlock SCIM for
Userflow

Userflow has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.

See how it works
Admin Console
Directory
Applications
Userflow logo
Userflow
via Stitchflow

Last updated: 2026-01-20

* Pricing and features sourced from public documentation.

Keep exploring

Related apps

Abnormal Security logo

Abnormal Security

No SCIM

Security / Email Security

ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Abnormal Security, the AI-powered email security platform protecting against BEC and phishing attacks, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While the platform supports SAML 2.0 SSO integration with identity providers like Okta and Entra ID, this only handles authentication—not automated user lifecycle management. Security teams must manually provision and deprovision analyst access through Abnormal's portal, creating operational overhead and potential security gaps in a platform specifically designed to protect against email-based threats. This manual provisioning model creates significant challenges for security operations. When new SOC analysts join or existing team members change roles, IT admins must coordinate manual account creation and permission updates in Abnormal Security. For a platform that's critical to threat detection and incident response, delays in provisioning can leave security gaps, while delayed deprovisioning creates compliance risks. The irony is stark: a security platform designed to prevent account takeover and credential abuse lacks the automated provisioning controls that prevent exactly these risks.

View full guide
Airwallex logo

Airwallex

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Airwallex, the global payments and treasury platform, offers no SCIM provisioning support on any plan, including their custom Accelerate enterprise tier. Despite being positioned for enterprise use with features like multi-entity management and advanced treasury controls, Airwallex lacks any official identity provider integrations—no SSO, no provisioning, and no presence in major IdP galleries like Okta's OIN or Microsoft Entra. This creates a significant operational burden for IT teams managing financial access across growing organizations, where manual user provisioning and deprovisioning in a payments platform presents both efficiency and security risks. The absence of identity management capabilities means IT administrators must manually create, update, and remove user accounts in Airwallex—a particularly concerning gap given that this platform handles sensitive financial operations, cross-border payments, and treasury management. Without automated deprovisioning, former employees could retain access to financial systems, creating compliance risks and potential security vulnerabilities that most finance and IT teams cannot afford to overlook.

View full guide
Alkami logo

Alkami

No SCIM
ProvisioningNot Supported
Manual Cost$9,490/yr

Alkami, the digital banking platform used by banks and credit unions, does not offer SCIM provisioning or public SSO integrations. As an enterprise-only platform with custom pricing, Alkami appears to handle user management through direct account administration rather than standardized identity protocols. This creates significant challenges for financial institutions that need to integrate Alkami with their existing identity infrastructure—particularly problematic given the compliance requirements and security standards that banks must maintain. The lack of automated provisioning means IT teams at financial institutions must manually create, update, and deprovision user accounts in Alkami. For a platform handling sensitive financial data and customer information, this manual approach introduces compliance risks and operational overhead. Banks typically require seamless integration between their core identity systems and all applications accessing customer data.

View full guide