Summary and recommendation
UXPin, the design collaboration and prototyping platform, does not offer SCIM provisioning on any plan. While UXPin provides SAML 2.0 SSO integration on their Enterprise tier ($119/user/month or custom pricing), this only handles authentication—not user lifecycle management. IT teams must manually create, update, and deactivate user accounts in UXPin's admin console. Even worse, SSO setup requires contacting your Account Manager for manual configuration, creating additional friction for deployments.
This creates a significant operational burden for organizations using UXPin across product and design teams. Without automated provisioning, IT admins face the ongoing task of manually managing user accounts as designers join, change roles, or leave the company. The lack of group provisioning also means team access to shared projects and libraries must be configured individually. For design-centric organizations that rely heavily on UXPin for product development workflows, this manual overhead scales poorly and creates compliance risks when user access isn't promptly updated.
The strategic alternative
UXPin has no native SCIM. Automate offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs. We maintain the integration layer underneath. You focus on judgment, not plumbing.
Quick SCIM facts
| SCIM available? | No |
| SCIM tier required | N/A |
| SSO required first? | Yes |
| SSO available? | Yes |
| SSO protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Documentation | Not available |
Supported identity providers
| IdP | SSO | SCIM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta | ✓ | ❌ | No SCIM available |
| Microsoft Entra ID | ✓ | ❌ | No SCIM available |
| Google Workspace | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
| OneLogin | Via third-party | ❌ | No native support |
The cost of not automating
Without SCIM (or an alternative like Stitchflow), your IT team manages UXPin accounts manually. Here's what that costs:
The UXPin pricing problem
UXPin gates SCIM provisioning behind premium plans, forcing significant cost increases for basic user management.
Tier comparison
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essentials | $6/user/month | ||
| Advanced | $29/user/month | ||
| Professional | $69/user/month | ||
| Company | $119/user/month | ||
| Enterprise | Custom pricing |
Pricing structure
| Plan | Price | SSO | SCIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essentials | $6/user/month | ||
| Advanced | $29/user/month | ||
| Professional | $69/user/month | ||
| Company | $119/user/month | ||
| Enterprise | Custom pricing |
What this means in practice
Manual account lifecycle management: When a new designer joins your product team, IT must log into UXPin's admin panel to create their account, assign them to the correct workspace, and set permissions. When they leave, you must remember to manually deactivate their access—there's no automated offboarding.
SSO setup friction: Even with Enterprise pricing, SSO requires coordinating with your UXPin Account Manager for manual SAML configuration. This isn't a self-service setup through your IdP's app gallery.
Design team scaling challenges: As your design organization grows, user management becomes increasingly manual. Adding 10 new designers means 10 separate account creation tasks, each requiring admin intervention.
Additional constraints
Summary of challenges
- UXPin does not provide native SCIM at any price tier
- Organizations must rely on third-party tools or manual provisioning
- Our research shows teams manually provisioning this app spend significant hidden costs annually
What UXPin actually offers for identity
SAML SSO (Enterprise tier only)
UXPin supports SAML 2.0 integration on their Enterprise plan:
| Setting | Details |
|---|---|
| Protocol | SAML 2.0 |
| Supported IdPs | Okta, OneLogin, custom SAML providers |
| Configuration | Manual setup through Account Manager |
| Tier requirement | Enterprise ($119+/user/month or custom pricing) |
| 2FA enforcement | Available account-wide |
Key limitation: SSO setup is entirely manual and requires coordinating with your UXPin Account Manager. There's no self-service configuration.
No SCIM provisioning
UXPin has no documented SCIM endpoint or user provisioning capabilities:
| Feature | Supported? |
|---|---|
| Create users | ❌ No |
| Update user attributes | ❌ No |
| Deactivate users | ❌ No |
| Group provisioning | ❌ No |
| Automated onboarding | ❌ No |
Okta Integration limitations
The official Okta Integration Network listing confirms these restrictions:
| Feature | Supported? |
|---|---|
| SAML SSO | ✓ Yes (Enterprise tier) |
| SCIM provisioning | ❌ No |
| User lifecycle management | ❌ No |
Bottom line: You get basic SAML authentication at Enterprise pricing, but zero automation for user lifecycle management. Every user addition, role change, and deactivation remains a manual process between your IT team and UXPin administrators.
For design teams that scale rapidly or frequently adjust access based on project needs, this manual overhead becomes a significant operational burden.
What IT admins are saying
UXPin's manual provisioning approach frustrates IT teams managing design tool access:
- Every user account must be manually created in UXPin before SSO authentication works
- SSO setup requires coordinating directly with UXPin Account Managers rather than self-service configuration
- No automated user lifecycle management means manual cleanup when designers change teams or leave
- Design team scaling requires constant manual intervention for user provisioning
SSO setup is manual configuration process
Contact Account Manager for SSO setup
The recurring theme
Even on Enterprise plans, UXPin treats user provisioning as a manual, high-touch process. IT teams must coordinate with vendors and manually manage user lifecycles instead of automating through their identity provider.
The decision
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Small design team (<10 users) with stable membership | Manual management is workable |
| Growing product team with frequent designer onboarding | Use Stitchflow: manual provisioning creates design workflow bottlenecks |
| Enterprise with multiple design teams across products | Use Stitchflow: automation essential for scale |
| Organizations requiring SOC 2 compliance audit trails | Use Stitchflow: automated provisioning logs required |
| Companies using UXPin alongside other design tools | Use Stitchflow: unified provisioning across design stack |
The bottom line
UXPin is a sophisticated design collaboration platform, but it offers no SCIM provisioning—even SSO requires manual coordination with an Account Manager. For product teams that need automated user lifecycle management without the overhead of manual provisioning workflows, Stitchflow delivers the automation UXPin doesn't provide.
Make UXPin workflows AI-native
UXPin has no native SCIM. We build complete offboarding, user access reviews, and license workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.
Technical specifications
SCIM Version
Not specifiedSupported Operations
Not specifiedSupported Attributes
Plan requirement
Not specifiedPrerequisites
Not specifiedKey limitations
- No public SCIM documentation found
- SSO setup requires contacting Account Manager
- SSO is manual configuration process
Documentation not available.
Configuration for Okta
Integration type
Okta Integration Network (OIN) app
Prerequisite
SSO must be configured before enabling SCIM.
Where to enable
Docs
Enterprise required for SCIM
Use Stitchflow for automated provisioning.
Unlock SCIM for
UXPin
UXPin has no native SCIM. We still automate end-to-end workflows across every app, including the ones without APIs.
See how it works


