
It's 2:00 a.m., and the IT security team gets an alert no one anticipated: "Data breach detected."
The incident response team quickly mobilizes, only to discover the breach originated from an unauthorized AI-powered design tool used by the marketing team.
The tool was acquired without IT knowledge, and left unsecured by a contractor who left the organization two months ago. Their access was never properly deprovisioned.
The marketing team had been using the tool for months, storing sensitive campaign materials and client information. When the contractor left, their personal account remained active with full access to company data, and completely invisible to the organization's Okta directory.
Sounds like a nightmare?
It's the daily reality facing IT leaders as shadow IT proliferates, especially with the explosion of unvetted SaaS apps. In fact, 53% of security breaches involve "orphaned accounts" that should have been deprovisioned.
Most IT and security leaders are aware of shadow IT as a concept, but many underestimate its true scale of shadow IT risks in their companies.
In this article, we will explore how shadow IT risks have evolved from a minor inconvenience into a critical security threat, examine why traditional discovery methods fail to detect disconnected apps, and outline actionable steps to identify and manage these shadow IT security risks before they compromise your organization.
Why disconnected apps hold you back
When a company relies solely on an identity provider (IdP) like Okta or Azure AD to manage its software, it's missing a huge chunk of the application portfolio actually used by its employees. The reality is stark: 42% of company apps operate as shadow IT, completely outside your established security protocols and lifecycle management.
Couple that with the fact that approximately 86% of U.S. businesses have encountered cyber incidents in 2022 and 2023, with 13% of these caused by the use of shadow IT, and you understand why the risk of shadow IT is great.
Most shadow IT risks appear because these digital tools operate beyond your IT oversight. Driven by an urge for efficiency and productivity, employees constantly seek tools to help them get their jobs done more quickly and effectively.
This quest for getting things done often leads them to sign up for freemium services, purchase low-cost subscription applications that slip under procurement thresholds, or even use personal accounts for business purposes.
The recent genAI explosion has accelerated this trend dramatically, with 60% of employees now using unauthorized AI tools for everything from code debugging to content creation.
Such apps often lack enterprise-grade security features or aren't compliant with Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML)/System for Cross-Domain Identity Management (SCIM) standards, making them disconnected apps that live outside the secure, automated world governed by your IdP.
The result? An average of 975 unknown operating within organizations, with each one representing a potential entry point for attackers, a compliance breach, or a hidden cost.
Why shadow IT is a critical business risk
The impact of unchecked shadow IT risks extends far beyond minor inconveniences. Whenever sensitive data is stored, accessed, or transmitted through disconnected apps, organizations face cascading security vulnerabilities, compliance violations, and operational inefficiencies that directly threaten their financial health and reputation.
Let's explore the business risks that shadow IT poses, especially when data is mishandled.
Security vulnerabilities: The breach waiting to happen
Every unvetted SaaS app has potential access to a company's sensitive information. According to a recent study by IBM, the average global cost of a data breach is $4.88 million. So, how can we mitigate security vulnerabilities when apps aren't integrated with your IdP?
Remove orphaned accounts
When employees leave the organization, there's no automatic way to deprovision access to disconnected apps. Imagine an ex-employee retaining access to an old project management tool containing confidential client information. This creates a direct pathway for attackers to exploit abandoned credentials and gain unauthorized access to sensitive data.
Strengthen authentication controls
Major security incidents happen when disconnected apps lack enterprise security features like multi-factor authentication (MFA) or proper SSO integration. Without these protections, shadow IT risks include vulnerability to credential stuffing attacks, password breaches, and unauthorized access through weak authentication methods.
Discover (and eliminate) security blind spots
Attackers exploit sensitive data leaked through unapproved tools. For instance, when developers upload proprietary code to unapproved debugging tools, this critical information gets stored in unknown locations. Organizations remain unaware of these exposures until a breach happens.
Establish visibility and control
With thousands of employees across an organization, manually tracking every app on company devices is impossible. IT teams cannot assess security posture, monitor usage patterns, or ensure data handling complies with company policies for applications they don't know exist. This lack of oversight amplifies the risk of shadow IT across the organization.
These shadow IT security risks aren't just theoretical—they're actively impacting organizations today. Healthcare company Rula experienced these exact challenges firsthand when managing their 750+ employee and 500+ contractor workforce across 140+ SaaS applications.
Rula faced a critical shadow IT risk where employees leaving the company retained access to disconnected apps that Okta couldn't automatically deprovision. In addition, while Okta served as Rula's identity backbone, it couldn't cover the "long tail" of applications used by their contractor-heavy workforce.
Stitchflow connected to Rula's environment in under 30 minutes and built a real-time graph of every user, account, and license—whether automated or not—giving them complete visibility across both managed and unmanaged applications.
Stitchflow also provided real-time detection of orphaned, mismatched, and hidden accounts across their entire 140+ app ecosystem, including non-SCIM tools like Linear, Loom, and Calendly that operated outside their identity provider's reach.
As a result, Rula reduced over 200 orphaned access points across their contractor-heavy environment and closed 250+ compliance gaps.
This eliminated the manual spreadsheet processes that had left security blind spots and ensured that access governance extended beyond just Okta-managed applications to cover their entire SaaS stack.
Compliance nightmares: Failing your next audit
Regulatory frameworks like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) demand strict control over data access and management.
Shadow IT risks undermine this control by creating compliance gaps that thwart your audit readiness:
Incomplete evidence collection
During audit season, compliance teams face fire drills trying to collect evidence for applications in their environment.
The risks of shadow IT manifest through tedious manual processes, such as tracking user permissions across unknown platforms, identifying data storage locations, and documenting protection measures for applications that exist outside the official inventories.
Audit failures
Shadow IT circumvents established audit trails, making it nearly impossible to demonstrate proper data governance and access controls.
No wonder there's a 47% audit-failure rate tied to incomplete evidence, and inordinate manual effort by compliance teams to collect information for disconnected apps and users.
When auditors cannot trace data flows or verify security measures for disconnected apps, organizations struggle to prove compliance with regulatory requirements, leading to failed audits and regulatory scrutiny.
Regulatory penalties
Non-compliance carries severe financial and legal consequences. Shadow IT security risks create scenarios where sensitive data exists in uncontrolled environments.
For instance, if the sales team stores lead details with personally identifiable information (PII) in their cloud storage account, the data is now compromised.
When regulatory violations occur through these unmanaged channels, organizations face substantial fines, legal repercussions, and reputational damage that can impact business operations for years.
Financial implications: The hidden cost of "free"
While shadow IT may appear to be a shortcut to saving money by bypassing procurement processes, it typically leads to hidden financial losses that far exceed any initial savings.
Wasted licenses and forgotten subscriptions
Many organizations buy user licenses that remain unused due to a lack of visibility into disconnected apps.
A project lead might sign up for an agile project management tool, then abandon it for a better solution while leaving the original subscription active and forgotten.
By identifying and reclaiming these idle licenses, companies redirect significant resources to business-critical needs.
SSO tax avoidance traps
To avoid enterprise SSO fees, organizations often choose lower-tier plans that lack integration capabilities with identity providers.
While this appears cost-effective initially, the risks of shadow IT multiply when these disconnected applications require manual provisioning, monitoring, and security management.
The resulting operational overhead and security exposure costs far exceed the original SSO investment, creating false economies that burden IT teams.
Duplication and redundancy
Without central oversight, shadow IT security risks include teams unknowingly subscribing to multiple tools that perform identical functions.
For example, instead of purchasing a centralized Grammarly Business account for the team, individual employees might subscribe to personal plans and expense them separately, creating redundant costs across departments.
This fragmented approach not only wastes money but also creates data silos and inconsistent security policies.
Operational inefficiencies: Draining IT resources
Beyond initial costs, shadow IT risks create substantial operational burdens that drain IT department resources and reduce overall organizational efficiency.
Manual provisioning overhead
IT workers become trapped in the exhausting, reactive work cycles of trying to provision, deprovision, and audit hundreds of disconnected apps.
Performing tasks such as disabling accounts manually, tracking down information, and closing exposures consumes approximately the equivalent of ≈ 2 FTEs per 1,000 employees to just address these "app gaps."
Lack of integration
Disconnected apps operating outside your identity provider don't integrate with core business systems.
Shadow IT security risks intensify when these standalone applications create isolated data pools and fragmented workflows that prevent seamless collaboration.
Teams struggle to share information across platforms, duplicate data entry becomes common, and business processes break down at integration points.
This fragmentation reduces productivity organization-wide and forces employees to develop workarounds that further complicate the technology landscape.
Discover your hidden security exposures in 60 seconds.
Stitchflow's Shadow IT Scanner instantly reveals unauthorized apps accessing your company data—from AI tools to productivity platforms operating outside your security controls.
Try the free shadow IT scanner now→
The AI explosion: Accelerating the disconnected app crisis
While shadow IT risks have long challenged organizations, the rapid adoption of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, Midjourney, and countless specialized platforms has transformed this into an accelerating security crisis that demands immediate attention.
Even though a majority of employees now use unauthorized AI tools, yet most of these applications lack crucial enterprise security standards like SCIM/SAML integration or APIs for centralized management.
The pressure to maintain productivity drives unauthorized genAI app adoption.
For instance, a marketing team might upload sensitive branding assets to an unauthorized image generator, or developers could paste proprietary code into AI debugging tools to meet sprint deadlines.
The data exposure risk is immediate and permanent. When confidential information enters an AI prompt through these unvetted platforms, that data often becomes part of the model's training dataset or gets stored in systems outside your control.
Unlike traditional risks of shadow IT where data might remain contained within a single application, AI tools can distribute your sensitive information across vast neural networks, making data recovery impossible and compliance verification nearly unattainable.
Security teams face a lose-lose situation when balancing productivity demands with maintaining security around AI tools.
The pressure to enable business continuity often forces compromises that amplify shadow IT security risks across the organization.
Blocking AI tools entirely isn't viable—employees will simply find workarounds or use personal accounts, creating even greater risks of shadow IT through completely unmonitored channels.
The challenge lies in enabling safe AI adoption that doesn't drive employees toward unauthorized alternatives.
Organizations need governance frameworks that provide approved AI tools with proper security controls while maintaining the productivity benefits that make these technologies so appealing.
Without this balanced approach, shadow IT risks will continue accelerating as AI adoption outpaces security measures.
The discovery challenge: Why traditional methods fail
Most SaaS platforms and discovery tools rely exclusively on API integrations.
These solutions can only inventory applications that offer APIs for data exchange, essentially showing you the connected apps you already know about while missing the disconnected applications that represent the core of the shadow IT risks problem.
Self-reporting mechanisms prove equally inadequate. Manual surveys depend on employee memory and honesty, but people routinely forget about applications they use infrequently or fail to report tools they consider "harmless."
This approach creates an incomplete picture where the most dangerous exposures—forgotten subscriptions with lingering access—remain invisible to IT teams.
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASBs) offer network traffic monitoring but fall short of providing comprehensive visibility.
While CASBs can detect some cloud application usage patterns, they don't provide a granular inventory of all applications, user permissions, roles, or data stored within them.
A modern approach: Solving the disconnected app problem
After exploring shadow IT risks, hidden apps, lurking AI tools, and manual overload, the core message remains simple: "You can't manage what you can't see." Traditional discovery methods are like searching for a needle in a haystack while the haystack keeps growing.
To truly eliminate shadow IT risks, you need a comprehensive solution that uncovers 100% of your application portfolio, regardless of your integration status with IdPs. This means you need to look beyond reactive measures.
The modern solution framework involves the following:
- Complete discovery across all application types: Deploy discovery methods that identify connected apps, disconnected legacy systems, and newly adopted AI tools through multiple data sources—not just API integrations that miss the most dangerous exposures.
- Risk assessment and security vetting: Once discovered, evaluate each application for user permissions, security controls, data handling practices, and compliance with organizational policies. Prioritize applications processing sensitive client data or lacking enterprise security features.
- Automated remediation and governance: Implement systems that automatically deprovision orphaned accounts, reclaim unused licenses, and enforce consistent access policies across all applications—both managed and unmanaged.
- Continuous monitoring for emerging threats: Establish real-time detection for new unvetted applications entering your environment, particularly AI tools that employees adopt without IT approval.
- Balanced enablement with oversight: Create governance frameworks that enable safe adoption of new technologies while maintaining IT visibility and control, preventing the cycle of shadow IT risks from repeating.
Take control of your SaaS landscape
Understanding the problem is half the battle; the other half is taking decisive action. Here's a step-by-step guide to overcoming shadow IT risks:
Step 1: Acknowledge that your organization is likely to have disconnected app problems. An "It won't happen to us" mentality creates dangerous blind spots.
Step 2: Gain complete visibility into all SaaS apps in use. Look beyond your IdP and traditional API-based tools.
Step 3: Discover and prioritize applications that cause high security risks, such as orphaned accounts or accounts handling confidential user details.
Step 4: Manual deprovisioning and auditing are not scalable. Look for solutions that can automate these tasks across your entire app portfolio.
How Stitchflow solves the disconnected app problem
Stitchflow provides 100% coverage and control over your entire application portfolio, including manually managed, non-federated, and legacy tools that identity providers can't reach.
Our platform works by:
- Connecting to your IdP and all apps via API or CSV uploads
- Creating a live, cross-app user graph for unified visibility
- Continuously detecting orphaned, hidden, or unused accounts
- Enabling bulk remediation through automated workflows
- Discovering and risk-scoring new applications, including AI tools
The result: Your IT team escapes manual spreadsheet work, closes critical security gaps, ensures audit-ready compliance, and recovers wasted license spending.
Ready to eliminate shadow IT risks? Discover how Stitchflow gives your team real-time visibility and control.
Get your free shadow IT scan of the IT environment or schedule a personalized demo today.
Frequently asked questions
Shadow IT Risks refer to security, compliance, and operational threats created by unauthorized applications operating outside your IT department's oversight. With 42% of company apps running as shadow IT and the average data breach costing $4.88 million, these risks represent critical business threats. Shadow IT Risks include orphaned accounts from departed employees, data exposure through unvetted tools, compliance violations, and wasted licensing costs that can drain organizational resources and reputation.
GenAI tools are dramatically accelerating Shadow IT Risks because 60% of employees now use unauthorized AI applications for work tasks. Unlike traditional shadow IT, AI tools pose unique dangers—when employees upload sensitive data to unauthorized platforms like ChatGPT or image generators, that information often becomes part of training datasets and cannot be recovered. These AI-powered Shadow IT Risks create permanent data exposure that's nearly impossible to track or remediate after the fact.
Traditional identity providers only manage applications with SAML/SCIM integration, missing the "disconnected apps" that create the biggest Shadow IT Risks. Your IdP can't see freemium tools, personal accounts used for business, or legacy applications without API integration. This means organizations typically have 975+ unknown applications operating outside their security controls, with each one representing potential Shadow IT Risks that could trigger compliance failures or security breaches.
Shadow IT Risks create multiple hidden costs: wasted licenses from forgotten subscriptions, compliance audit failures (47% audit-failure rate), and operational overhead equivalent to 2 full-time employees per 1,000 workers just to manage app gaps. Organizations face regulatory penalties for GDPR, HIPAA, or CCPA violations when Shadow IT Risks compromise data governance. The "free" tools that seem cost-effective actually drain resources through manual provisioning, security management, and duplicate subscriptions across departments.
Eliminating Shadow IT Risks requires going beyond traditional API-based discovery tools that only show connected apps. You need comprehensive visibility across your entire application portfolio, including disconnected and manually-managed tools. The solution involves: complete discovery through multiple data sources, automated risk assessment and security vetting, continuous monitoring for new unauthorized applications (especially AI tools), and automated remediation workflows that can deprovision orphaned accounts and reclaim unused licenses across all applications, not just those managed by your identity provider.
Pravinan Sankar is fascinated by the chaos that happens when orgs try to manage hundreds of SaaS tools without losing their sanity. He creates content for IT teams who want fewer surprises in their workday. His approach blends data with storytelling because spreadsheets alone don't inspire action.